IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pid/pviewp/202672.html

Winning Transhipment: A Roadmap to Make Gwadar a Preferred Hub for Global Shipping Lines

Author

Listed:
  • Mujtaba Arshad

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad)

Abstract

The disruption in the Strait of Hormuz in early 2026 briefly redirected regional cargo flows toward Pakistan's ports, with Karachi recording an unprecedented surge in transhipment activity and Gwadar receiving its first dedicated transhipment vessel call. While these developments highlighted Pakistan's strategic location outside the Gulf risk zone, they also demonstrated that temporary geopolitical disruptions alone cannot sustain long-term transhipment growth. Once regional stability returns, cargo will flow back to established hubs unless Pakistan strengthens its commercial competitiveness. This Policy View argues that Gwadar can become a preferred regional transhipment hub only if shipping lines choose it on commercial merit rather than crisis-driven necessity. It proposes five mutually reinforcing reforms; improving commercial competitiveness through competitive pricing, digital customs, dredging, and security; securing long-term commitments from major liner operators; systematically diverting bulk cargo to build throughput; developing an inclusive blue economy around Gwadar's fishing sector; and establishing Gwadar as Balochistan's principal mineral export gateway. Together, these reforms provide a commercially grounded roadmap for transforming Gwadar into a preferred regional transhipment hub under CPEC 2.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Mujtaba Arshad, 2026. "Winning Transhipment: A Roadmap to Make Gwadar a Preferred Hub for Global Shipping Lines," PIDE Policy View Point 2026:72, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:pid:pviewp:2026:72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://file.pide.org.pk/pdfpideresearch/pv-72-winning-transhipment-a-roadmap-to-make-gwadar-a-preferred-hub-for-global-shipping-lines.pdf
    File Function: First Version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malchow, Matthew B. & Kanafani, Adib, 2004. "A disaggregate analysis of port selection," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 317-337, July.
    2. Chathumi Kavirathna & Tomoya Kawasaki & Shinya Hanaoka & Takuma Matsuda, 2018. "Transshipment hub port selection criteria by shipping lines: the case of hub ports around the bay of Bengal," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Piyush Tiwari & Hidekazu Itoh & Masayuki Doi, 2003. "Shippers' Port and Carrier Selection Behaviour in China: A Discrete Choice Analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 5(1), pages 23-39, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felipe Lobo Umbelino Souza & Cira Souza Pitombo & Dong Yang, 2021. "Port choice in Brazil: a qualitative research related to in-depth interviews," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Ricardo J. Sanchez & Adolf K. Y. Ng & Lorena Garcia‐Alonso, 2011. "Port Selection Factors and Attractiveness: The Service Providers' Perspective," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(2), pages 141-161, April.
    3. David Guerrero, 2020. "A global analysis of hinterlands from a European perspective. In: Global Logistics Network Modelling and Policy: Quantification and Analysis for International Freight," Post-Print hal-02551947, HAL.
    4. Haiying Jia & Ove Daae Lampe & Veronika Solteszova & Siri P. Strandenes, 2017. "Norwegian port connectivity and its policy implications," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 956-966, November.
    5. Steven, Adams B. & Corsi, Thomas M., 2012. "Choosing a port: An analysis of containerized imports into the US," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 881-895.
    6. Larranaga, Ana Margarita & Arellana, Julian & Senna, Luiz Afonso, 2017. "Encouraging intermodality: A stated preference analysis of freight mode choice in Rio Grande do Sul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 202-211.
    7. Julián Martinez-Moya & Amparo Mestre-Alcover & Ramon Sala-Garrido, 2024. "Connectivity and competitiveness of the major Mediterranean container ports using ‘Benefit-of-the-Doubt’ and ‘Common Sets of Weights’ methods in Data Envelopment Analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(2), pages 261-282, June.
    8. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    9. Likun Wang & Anne Goodchild & Yong Wang, 2018. "The effect of distance on cargo flows: a case study of Chinese imports and their hinterland destinations," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 456-475, September.
    10. Jiannan, Cheng & feng, Lian & Zhongzhen, Yang, 2020. "Impacts of the choice habits of port users on the effects and efficiencies of port investment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 203-214.
    11. Mona Kashiha & Jean-Claude Thill, 2016. "Spatial competition and contestability based on choice histories of consumers," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(4), pages 877-894, November.
    12. Low, Joyce M.W. & Lam, Shao Wei & Tang, Loon Ching, 2009. "Assessment of hub status among Asian ports from a network perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 593-606, July.
    13. Sang-Yoon Lee & Hyunwoo Lim & Hwa-Joong Kim, 2017. "Forecasting container port volume: implications for dredging," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(2), pages 296-314, June.
    14. Flitsch, Verena & Brümmerstedt, Katrin, 2015. "Freight Transport Modelling of Container Hinterland Supply Chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 233-266, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    15. Simme Veldman & Eric van Drunen, 2011. "Measuring Competition between Ports," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.), International Handbook of Maritime Economics, chapter 15, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Vega, Laura & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián, 2019. "Assessing the impact of major infrastructure projects on port choice decision: The Colombian case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 132-148.
    17. Ma, Qifei & Li, Sujuan & Jia, Peng & Kuang, Haibo, 2025. "Is port integration a panacea for regions green development: An empirical study of China port city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 15-28.
    18. Kaliszewski, Adam & Kozłowski, Arkadiusz & Dąbrowski, Janusz & Klimek, Hanna, 2021. "LinkedIn survey reveals competitiveness factors of container terminals: Forwarders’ view," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 131-140.
    19. Li, Diansheng & Qu, Yuanyuan & Ma, Yanhong, 2020. "Study on the impact of subsidies for overlapping hinterland shippers on port competition," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 24-37.
    20. Javier Cantillo & Víctor Cantillo-García & Víctor Cantillo & Julián Arellana, 2023. "Port choice using aggregate open data: an application to Colombian port zones," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(3), pages 520-548, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:pviewp:2026:72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.