IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oxf/wpaper/977.html

Persuasion without Priors

Author

Listed:
  • Alexei Parakhonyak
  • Anton Sobolev

Abstract

We consider an information design problem when the sender faces ambiguity regarding the probability distribution over the states of the world, the utility function and the prior of the receiver. The solution concept is minimax loss (regret), that is, the sender minimizes the distance from the full information benchmark in the worst-case scenario. We show that in the binary states and binary actions setting the optimal strategy involves a mechanism with a continuum of messages, which admits a representation as a randomization over mechanisms consisting of two messages. A small level of uncertainty regarding the receiver’s prior makes the sender more truthful than in the full information benchmark, but as uncertainty increases at some point the sender starts to lie more. If the sender either knows the probability distribution over the states of the world, or knows that the receiver knows it, then the maximal loss is bounded from above by 1/e. This result generalizes to an infinite state model, provided that the set of admissible mechanisms is limited to cut-off strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexei Parakhonyak & Anton Sobolev, 2022. "Persuasion without Priors," Economics Series Working Papers 977, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:467725e2-d1f0-460e-8d84-a7a9a7558119
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emir Kamenica, 2019. "Bayesian Persuasion and Information Design," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 249-272, August.
    2. Kosterina, Svetlana, 2022. "Persuasion with unknown beliefs," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(3), July.
    3. Dirk Bergemann & Karl Schlag, 2012. "Robust Monopoly Pricing," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Robust Mechanism Design The Role of Private Information and Higher Order Beliefs, chapter 13, pages 417-441, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Piotr Dworczak & Alessandro Pavan, 2022. "Preparing for the Worst but Hoping for the Best: Robust (Bayesian) Persuasion," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(5), pages 2017-2051, September.
    5. Dirk Bergemann & Karl H. Schlag, 2012. "Pricing Without Priors," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Robust Mechanism Design The Role of Private Information and Higher Order Beliefs, chapter 12, pages 405-415, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Charles F. Manski, 2004. "Statistical Treatment Rules for Heterogeneous Populations," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1221-1246, July.
    7. Dirk Bergemann & Stephen Morris, 2019. "Information Design: A Unified Perspective," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 57(1), pages 44-95, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexei Parakhonyak & Anton Sobolev, 2026. "Persuasion without Priors," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 81(3), pages 625-659, May.
    2. Eitan Sapiro-Gheiler, 2024. "Persuasion with ambiguous receiver preferences," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 77(4), pages 1173-1218, June.
    3. Eitan Sapiro-Gheiler, 2021. "Persuasion with Ambiguous Receiver Preferences," Papers 2109.11536, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    4. Babichenko, Yakov & Talgam-Cohen, Inbal & Xu, Haifeng & Zabarnyi, Konstantin, 2022. "Regret-minimizing Bayesian persuasion," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 226-248.
    5. Tim S. G. van Eck & Pieter Kleer & Johan S. H. van Leeuwaarden, 2026. "Distributionally Robust Monopoly Pricing: Switching from Low to High Prices in Volatile Markets," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 1248-1265, July.
    6. Cheng, Xiaoyu, 2025. "Ambiguous persuasion: An ex-ante formulation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 149-158.
    7. Lang, Matthias & Wasser, Cédric, 0. "Benefits and challenges of ambiguous product information," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society.
    8. Kun Zhang, 2025. "Uncharted Waters: Selling a New Product Robustly," Papers 2508.04134, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    9. Stoye, Jörg, 2012. "Minimax regret treatment choice with covariates or with limited validity of experiments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 138-156.
    10. Yujing Chen, 2026. "Bayesian Persuasion with a Risk-Conscious Receiver," Papers 2605.12094, arXiv.org.
    11. Inostroza, Nicolas A. & Pavan, Alessandro, 2025. "Adversarial coordination and public information design," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 20(2), May.
    12. Takashi Ui, 2022. "Optimal and Robust Disclosure of Public Information," Papers 2203.16809, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    13. Arieli, Itai & Babichenko, Yakov & Madmon, Omer & Tennenholtz, Moshe, 2025. "Robust price discrimination," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 377-395.
    14. You Zu & Krishnamurthy Iyer & Haifeng Xu, 2025. "Learning to Persuade on the Fly: Robustness Against Ignorance," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(1), pages 194-208, January.
    15. Krishnamurthy Iyer & Haifeng Xu & You Zu, 2023. "Markov Persuasion Processes with Endogenous Agent Beliefs," Papers 2307.03181, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    16. Frederic Koessler & Marco Scarsini & Tristan Tomala, 2025. "Information Design and Full Implementation in Nonatomic Games," Papers 2502.05920, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    17. repec:upd:utmpwp:039 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Wanchang Zhang, 2022. "Information-Robust Optimal Auctions," Papers 2205.04137, arXiv.org.
    19. Emir Kamenica & Kyungmin Kim & Andriy Zapechelnyuk, 2021. "Bayesian persuasion and information design: perspectives and open issues," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(3), pages 701-704, October.
    20. Król, Michał, 2012. "Product differentiation decisions under ambiguous consumer demand and pessimistic expectations," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 593-604.
    21. Max Simchowitz & Aleksandrs Slivkins, 2024. "Exploration and Incentives in Reinforcement Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 983-998, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anne Pouliquen The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Anne Pouliquen to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfeixuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.