IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/yt4xd.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Organizational Learning Orientation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Towards More Accountable Government-Linked Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Zulkarnain, Nur Nadiah
  • Alam, Md. Mahmudul

    (Universiti Utara Malaysia)

  • Abdullah, Nik Herda Nik
  • Said, Jamaliah

Abstract

Government-Linked Companies (GLCs) are expected to show competitive performance in order to reflect the accountability of taxpayers’ money. Therefore, this study is an attempt to assess the status of the current level of organizational learning orientation among the Government-Linked Companies (GLCs) in Malaysia. This study collected primary data based on a set of questionnaire survey among 134 executives and managers of GLCs in Malaysia. The data were collected based on opinions of the ten factors of organizational learning practices by using the five-point Likert scale. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Further, the reliability of the data was tested using Cronbach’s alpha test, the validity of the data was tested by checking the normality test through skewness and kurtosis, and the consistency of the data was tested using factor analysis. On an average, 74.6% of the respondents agreed that they focus on these factors of organizational learning. The federal owned GLCs place more emphasis on organizational learning than the state owned GLCs. This study suggests improving the practices of organizational learning within the GLCs in Malaysia by emphasizing on the consideration that employee learning is an investment rather than an expense, employees should view themselves as partners in charting the direction of the organization, employees should not be afraid of critically reflecting on the shared assumptions about the ways of managing the organization, and by analyzing unsuccessful organizational endeavours and communicating the lessons learned widely among the employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Zulkarnain, Nur Nadiah & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Abdullah, Nik Herda Nik & Said, Jamaliah, 2019. "Organizational Learning Orientation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Towards More Accountable Government-Linked Companies," SocArXiv yt4xd, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:yt4xd
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/yt4xd
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5d020a0fe2124b001a3819fc/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/yt4xd?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Fang & Sun, Qian & Tong, Wilson H. S., 2004. "Do government-linked companies underperform?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(10), pages 2461-2492, October.
    2. Aivazian, Varouj A. & Ge, Ying & Qiu, Jiaping, 2005. "Can corporatization improve the performance of state-owned enterprises even without privatization?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 11(5), pages 791-808, October.
    3. Nazrul Hisyam Ab Razak & Rubi Ahmad & Huson Aliahmed Joher, 2011. "Does Government Linked Companies (GLCs) perform better than non-GLCs? Evidence from Malaysian listed companies," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 1-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Said, Jamaliah & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Abdullah, Nik Herda Nik & Zulkarnain, Nur Nadiah & Anugerah, Rita, 2019. "Innovation Risk and Sustainable Competitive Advantages: Empirical Assessment of Government-Linked Companies in Malaysia," SocArXiv u7yth, Center for Open Science.
    2. Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Zulkarnain, Nur Nadiah & Abdullah, Nik Herda Nik, 2019. "Entrepreneurial Orientation for Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Risk Management: Evidence from Government-Linked Companies in Malaysia," SocArXiv wbq97, Center for Open Science.
    3. Said, Jamaliah & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Abdullah, Nik Herda Nik & Zulkarnain, Nur Nadiah, 2019. "Risk Management and Value Creation: Empirical Findings from Government Linked Companies in Malaysia," SocArXiv u7f4k, Center for Open Science.
    4. Choon-Yin Sam, 2013. "Partial privatisation and the role of state owned holding companies in China," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(3), pages 767-789, August.
    5. Wong, Wai-Yan & Hooy, Chee-Wooi, 2018. "Do types of political connection affect firm performance differently?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 297-317.
    6. Marco FRIGERIO & Daniela VANDONE, 2018. "Virtuous or Vicious? Development Banks in Europe," Departmental Working Papers 2018-07, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    7. Li, Larry & McMurray, Adela & Sy, Malick & Xue, Jinjun, 2018. "Corporate ownership, efficiency and performance under state capitalism: Evidence from China," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 747-766.
    8. Said, Jamaliah & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Abdullah, Nik Herda Nik & Zulkarnain, Nur Nadiah, 2019. "Market Orientation for Better Accountability of Government-Linked Companies," SocArXiv uxfqa, Center for Open Science.
    9. Mico APOSTOLOV, 2016. "Ownership And Control Structures A Case Study," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(2), pages 23-37, June.
    10. Ciprian Stan & Mike Peng & Garry Bruton, 2014. "Slack and the performance of state-owned enterprises," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 473-495, June.
    11. Le, Manh-Duc & Pieri, Fabio & Zaninotto, Enrico, 2019. "From central planning towards a market economy: The role of ownership and competition in Vietnamese firms’ productivity," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 693-716.
    12. Richard W. Carney & Travers Barclay Child, 2015. "Business Networks and Crisis Performance: Professional, Political, and Family Ties," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-135/V, Tinbergen Institute, revised 20 Feb 2015.
    13. Sangeetha Gunasekar & Jayati Sarkar, 2014. "Does autonomy matter in state owned enterprises? Evidence from performance contracts in India," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2014-034, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    14. Jayant Menon & Thiam Hee Ng, 2013. "Are Government-Linked Corporations Crowding out Private Investment in Malaysia?," Departmental Working Papers 2013-03, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    15. Laura Cabeza García & Silvia Gómez Ansón, 2012. "What Drives the Operating Performance of Privatised Firms?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 59(1), pages 1-27, February.
    16. György, László & Veress, József, 2013. "The Possible Causes of and Means of Avoiding External Financial Vulnerability – Hungary versus Singapore," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 58(1), pages 53-75.
    17. Wong, Chan-Yuan, 2011. "Rent-seeking, industrial policies and national innovation systems in Southeast Asian economies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 231-243.
    18. Raymond, H., 2008. "The effect of Sovereign Wealth Funds’ involvement on stock markets," Occasional papers 7, Banque de France.
    19. Mahmoud Agha & Baban Eulaiwi, 2020. "The alignment effects of CEO stock incentives in the presence of government ownership: International evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council countries," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 195-222, May.
    20. McDonald, David A., 2016. "To corporatize or not to corporatize (and if so, how?)," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 107-114.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:yt4xd. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.