IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/wjx7v_v1.html

Access Is Not Action: An Agent-Based Model of Climate Information Flow and Usability in Institutional Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Puga-Gonzalez, Ivan

    (Norwegian Research Center (NORCE))

  • Soares, Marta Bruno
  • Falck, Vanja
  • Van Wolleghem, Pierre
  • Lima, Larissa Lopes
  • Shults, F. LeRon

Abstract

This study examines the conditions under which climate information becomes usable within institutional networks. Although substantial efforts have been devoted to improving the production and dissemination of climate information, a persistent gap remains between information availability and its practical use in adaptation decision-making. Existing research has identified numerous barriers and enabling conditions affecting climate information use, but less attention has been given to how these factors interact within institutional networks to shape usability outcomes. To address this gap, we develop an empirically grounded agent-based model of climate information flow and usability based on the network of ICLEI Europe and its member municipalities. The model integrates three complementary empirical sources: survey data on information creation, request, sharing, and exchange; qualitative interviews examining how climate information is translated into institutional action; and secondary datasets used as proxy indicators for institutional, political, and contextual conditions. Together, these data inform both the structure of the network and the behavioural mechanisms governing information use. The model simulates the creation, exchange, and evaluation of climate information between municipalities and explores how institutional capacity, peer support, co-creation, and political barriers influence usability. Results show that information availability within the network is consistently high, with most information requests being fulfilled. However, information use remains comparatively low, revealing a persistent access–use gap. Sensitivity analyses indicate that usability is primarily shaped by accumulated experience, peer support, and political and institutional barriers. Strong peer networks and collaborative experience can substantially improve usability. Methodologically, the study demonstrates how survey data, interview findings, and proxy indicators can be systematically integrated into an agent-based modelling framework. Substantively, it highlights that improving adaptation outcomes requires greater attention to the conditions that enable information use, rather than focusing exclusively on increasing information provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Puga-Gonzalez, Ivan & Soares, Marta Bruno & Falck, Vanja & Van Wolleghem, Pierre & Lima, Larissa Lopes & Shults, F. LeRon, 2026. "Access Is Not Action: An Agent-Based Model of Climate Information Flow and Usability in Institutional Networks," SocArXiv wjx7v_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:wjx7v_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/wjx7v_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a34d2aaea41d2978b2bf368/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/wjx7v_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Bruno Soares & Suraje Dessai, 2016. "Barriers and enablers to the use of seasonal climate forecasts amongst organisations in Europe," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 89-103, July.
    2. Kristine Kern & Harriet Bulkeley, 2009. "Cities, Europeanization and Multi‐level Governance: Governing Climate Change through Transnational Municipal Networks," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 309-332, March.
    3. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:309-332 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Frantzeskaki, Niki & Buchel, Sophie & Spork, Charlie & Ludwig, Kathrin & Kok, Marcel T.J., 2019. "The Multiple Roles of ICLEI: Intermediating to Innovate Urban Biodiversity Governance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Abel, Dennis, 2021. "The diffusion of climate policies among German municipalities," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(1), pages 111-136, March.
    6. Taedong Lee & Susan Meene, 2012. "Who teaches and who learns? Policy learning through the C40 cities climate network," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(3), pages 199-220, September.
    7. Klaus Eisenack & Susanne C. Moser & Esther Hoffmann & Richard J. T. Klein & Christoph Oberlack & Anna Pechan & Maja Rotter & Catrien J. A. M. Termeer, 2014. "Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(10), pages 867-872, October.
    8. Maria Carmen Lemos & Christine J. Kirchhoff & Vijay Ramprasad, 2012. "Narrowing the climate information usability gap," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(11), pages 789-794, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoonsoo Kim & Inhwan Ko, 2025. "Translocal climate club as a wall of fame? A panel study on the US cities’ membership in the Global Covenant of Mayors, 2014–2024," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 58(3), pages 563-580, September.
    2. Jennifer S. Bansard & Philipp H. Pattberg & Oscar Widerberg, 2017. "Cities to the rescue? Assessing the performance of transnational municipal networks in global climate governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 229-246, April.
    3. Sam Taveirne & Ben Derudder, 2024. "Overcoming gridlock? The role of city networks in transnational cooperation on climate mitigation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(4), pages 644-659, September.
    4. Michele Acuto & Benjamin Leffel, 2021. "Understanding the global ecosystem of city networks," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(9), pages 1758-1774, July.
    5. Surminski, Swenja & Barnes, Jonathan & Vincent, Katharine, 2022. "Can insurance catalyse government planning on climate? Emergent evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113564, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Richard H. Moss, 2016. "Assessing decision support systems and levels of confidence to narrow the climate information “usability gap”," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 143-155, March.
    7. Saveria Olga Murielle Boulanger & Martina Massari, 2022. "Advocating Urban Transition: A Qualitative Review of Institutional and Grassroots Initiatives in Shaping Climate-Aware Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Leonardo Zea-Reyes & Veronica Olivotto & Sylvia I. Bergh, 2021. "Understanding institutional barriers in the climate change adaptation planning process of the city of Beirut: vicious cycles and opportunities," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Kathryn Davidson & Lars Coenen & Michele Acuto & Brendan Gleeson, 2019. "Reconfiguring urban governance in an age of rising city networks: A research agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(16), pages 3540-3555, December.
    10. Taedong Lee & Chris Koski, 2015. "Multilevel governance and urban climate change mitigation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(6), pages 1501-1517, December.
    11. Solveig Grønnestad & Anne Bach Nielsen, 2022. "Institutionalising city networking: Discursive and rational choice institutional perspectives on membership of transnational municipal networks," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(14), pages 2951-2967, November.
    12. Jochen Hinkel & Diana Mangalagiu & Alexander Bisaro & J. David Tàbara, 2020. "Transformative narratives for climate action," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 495-506, June.
    13. Jorn Koelemaij & Sam Taveirne & Ben Derudder, 2023. "An economic geography perspective on city diplomacy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(6), pages 995-1012, May.
    14. De Felice, Matteo & Soares, Marta Bruno & Alessandri, Andrea & Troccoli, Alberto, 2019. "Scoping the potential usefulness of seasonal climate forecasts for solar power management," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 215-223.
    15. Richard Moss, 2016. "Assessing decision support systems and levels of confidence to narrow the climate information “usability gap”," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 143-155, March.
    16. Andreas Corcaci & Jörg Kemmerzell, 2023. "Trans‐local action and local climate policy. Configurations of success for climate innovations in the European multilevel system," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 1120-1143, November.
    17. S. H. A. Koop & L. Koetsier & A. Doornhof & O. Reinstra & C. J. Van Leeuwen & S. Brouwer & C. Dieperink & P. P. J. Driessen, 2017. "Assessing the Governance Capacity of Cities to Address Challenges of Water, Waste, and Climate Change," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(11), pages 3427-3443, September.
    18. Michael Mintrom & Joannah Luetjens, 2017. "Policy entrepreneurs and problem framing: The case of climate change," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(8), pages 1362-1377, December.
    19. Adam J. Snitker & Laurie Yung & Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf & R. Kyle Bocinsky & Neva Hassanein & Kelsey Jensco & Ada P. Smith & Austin Schuver, 2024. "How agricultural producers use local knowledge, climate information, and on-farm “experiments” to address drought risk," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(4), pages 1857-1875, December.
    20. Surminski, Swenja & Barnes, Jonathan & Vincent, Katharine, 2022. "Can insurance catalyse government planning on climate? Emergent evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:wjx7v_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.