IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/f4pgy_v1.html

A computational approach for characterizing social and ecological values in public comments

Author

Listed:
  • Chase, Sarah K.
  • Sachdeva, Sonya
  • Wood, Spencer A

    (University of Washington)

  • Lawler, Joshua J

Abstract

1. Addressing social and ecological values is a central aim of democratic environmental management and policymaking, especially during deliberative and participatory processes. Agencies responsible for managing public lands would benefit from a deepened understanding of how various publics’ value those lands. 2. Federal land management agencies receive millions of written comments from the public on proposed management actions annually, providing a unique source of insights into how the public assigns value to public lands. To date, little attention has been directed towards methods for analyzing the public’s comments to understand their expressed values, in part because the volume of comments often makes manual analysis unworkable. 3. This study introduces and applies a novel computational approach to inferring values in written text by using natural language processing and a method that combines a lexicon with semantic embedding models. We developed embedding models for four types of values that are expressed in public comments. We then fit models to 409,241 public comments on actions proposed by the United States Forest Service from 2011 to 2020 and regulated by the Natural Environmental Policy Act. 4. The embedding model generally outperformed the lexicon word-count, particularly for value types with shorter lexicons, and, like human evaluators, the embedding models performed better for more evident values and were less reliable for more abstract or latent values. 5. By applying the resulting model, we furthered our understanding of how the public values National Forest lands in the United States. We observed that aesthetic and moral values were expressed more often in comments for projects that received more public interest, as gauged by the number of comments a project received and in comments for projects addressing recreational management.

Suggested Citation

  • Chase, Sarah K. & Sachdeva, Sonya & Wood, Spencer A & Lawler, Joshua J, 2025. "A computational approach for characterizing social and ecological values in public comments," SocArXiv f4pgy_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:f4pgy_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/f4pgy_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/67b8d5c98e449c318d313dd6/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/f4pgy_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katie Hoover & Marc J. Stern, 2014. "Constraints to public influence in US Forest Service NEPA processes," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 173-189, February.
    2. Laura K. Nelson, 2020. "Computational Grounded Theory: A Methodological Framework," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(1), pages 3-42, February.
    3. Gugulica, Madalina & Burghardt, Dirk, 2023. "Mapping indicators of cultural ecosystem services use in urban green spaces based on text classification of geosocial media data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Germain, Rene H. & Floyd, Donald W. & Stehman, Stephen V., 2001. "Public perceptions of the USDA Forest Service public participation process," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3-4), pages 113-124, November.
    5. Okhumode H. Yakubu, 2018. "Delivering Environmental Justice through Environmental Impact Assessment in the United States: The Challenge of Public Participation," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Busch, Christin & Specht, Kathrin & Inostroza, Luis & Falke, Matthias & Zepp, Harald, 2024. "Disentangling cultural ecosystem services co-production in urban green spaces through social media reviews," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Artur José Sitoe & Seunghoo Lim, 2024. "Understanding citizens' perception of channels for participating in administration based on their motivation in an authoritarian regime: The case of Gaza Province, Mozambique," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 606-625, January.
    3. Bayne, Karen M. & Grant, Andrea, 2024. "Who cares what happens with planted forests? A public typology to assist community engagement and communication," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Brian Heseung Kim & Julie J. Park & Pearl Lo & Dominique Baker & Nancy Wong & Stephanie Breen & Huong Truong & Jia Zheng & Kelly Rosinger & OiYan A. Poon, 2025. "Letters of Recommendation by High School Counselors in Selective College Admissions: Differences by Race and Socioeconomic Status in Letter Length and Topics Discussed," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(5), pages 1-35, August.
    5. Schauerte, Nico & Becker, Maren & Imschloss, Monika & Wichmann, Julian R.K. & Reinartz, Werner J., 2023. "The managerial relevance of marketing science: Properties and genesis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 801-822.
    6. repec:osf:osfxxx:jvpbw_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Bethmann, Stephanie & Simminger, Eva & Baldy, Jana & Schraml, Ulrich, 2018. "Forestry in interaction. Shedding light on dynamics of public opinion with a praxeological methodology," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 93-101.
    8. Stef M Shuster & Celeste Campos-Castillo & Navid Madani & Kenneth Joseph, 2024. "Who supports Bernie? Analyzing identity and ideological variation on Twitter during the 2020 democratic primaries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Abramson, Corey & Li, Zhuofan & Prendergast, Tara & Dohan, Daniel, 2025. "Qualitative Research in an Era of AI: A Pragmatic Approach to Data Analysis, Workflow, and Computation," SocArXiv 7bsgy_v1, Center for Open Science.
    10. Fontan, Clément & Goutsmedt, Aurélien, 2023. "The ECB and the inflation monsters: strategic framing and the responsibility imperative (1998-2023)," SocArXiv 92r54, Center for Open Science.
    11. Jana Lasser & Segun T. Aroyehun & Fabio Carrella & Almog Simchon & David Garcia & Stephan Lewandowsky, 2023. "From alternative conceptions of honesty to alternative facts in communications by US politicians," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(12), pages 2140-2151, December.
    12. Heran Guan & Rossilah Jamil, 2026. "How recruitment signals become memes: competitive intelligence dynamics in ten Chinese AI firms," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Jin Guo & Junhong Bai, 2019. "The Role of Public Participation in Environmental Governance: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Lei Mu & Lijun Xing & Ying Jing & Qinjiang Hu, 2023. "Spatial Optimization of Park Green Spaces by an Improved Two-Step Optimization Model from the Perspective of Maximizing Accessibility Equity," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Wang, Xincheng & Li, Yuan & Tian, Longwei & Hou, Ye, 2023. "Government digital initiatives and firm digital innovation: Evidence from China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    16. Alex Luscombe & Kevin Dick & Kevin Walby, 2022. "Algorithmic thinking in the public interest: navigating technical, legal, and ethical hurdles to web scraping in the social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1023-1044, June.
    17. You Zuo & Lin Zhang, 2023. "Research on Local Ecosystem Cultural Services in the Jiangnan Water Network Rural Areas: A Case Study of the Ecological Green Integration Demonstration Zone in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Nicola Righetti & Niccolò Bertuzzi, 2025. "Rethinking Veganism in the Digital Age. Innovating Methodology and Typology to Explore a Decade of Facebook Discourses," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 30(1), pages 96-115, March.
    19. Usman Sattar, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework of Climate Action Needs of the Least Developed Party Countries of the Paris Agreement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.
    20. Shoma Jingu & Yui Ogawa & Kazushige Yamaki & Asako Miyamoto & Norimasa Takayama, 2024. "Social Media as a Lens for Citizen Science: Investigating Visitor Contributions in a Forest Recreational Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.
    21. Stijn Daenekindt & Julian Schaap, 2022. "Using word embedding models to capture changing media discourses: a study on the role of legitimacy, gender and genre in 24,000 music reviews, 1999–2021," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1615-1636, November.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:f4pgy_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.