IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v79y2026ics2212041626000276.html

Digital windows into nature’s values: A critical review of cultural ecosystem services research with social media data

Author

Listed:
  • Ghermandi, Andrea
  • Calcagni, Fulvia
  • Langemeyer, Johannes
  • Schirpke, Uta

Abstract

Understanding how people relate to nature is essential for addressing today’s complex social-ecological challenges. Cultural ecosystem services offer a valuable lens for exploring the non-material dimensions of human–nature relations. In recent years, social media data have reshaped this research field, enabling novel insights but also introducing important challenges. This study systematically reviews and critically analyzes 218 peer-reviewed articles on cultural ecosystem service assessments that use social media data. We examine geographic and biome-specific coverage, platforms and media formats employed, and key methodological developments, including the increasing role of artificial intelligence for automated content analysis. We further investigate how cultural ecosystem services are conceptualized and classified, organizing thematically similar categories from the literature into semantically coherent clusters, thereby highlighting tensions between universal frameworks and context-specific approaches. Despite growing interest and rapid methodological innovation, the field continues to grapple with platform-specific biases, data accessibility limitations, and a lack of coherence in cultural ecosystem services definitions and identification criteria. The continued reliance on a few dominant sources, particularly Flickr, and the prevalence of studies that draw data from only one platform raise concern about representativeness and long-term sustainability. To support future research, we propose a set of considerations aimed at strengthening analytical rigor and cross-study comparability. These include distinguishing between user-expressed and researcher-inferred experiences, differentiating ecosystem services from the benefits the generate, and explicitly addressing the “ecological” and “use” clauses of ecosystem services frameworks. While challenges remain, research in this area holds substantial promise for enabling scalable, near real-time, and nuanced assessments of cultural human–nature relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghermandi, Andrea & Calcagni, Fulvia & Langemeyer, Johannes & Schirpke, Uta, 2026. "Digital windows into nature’s values: A critical review of cultural ecosystem services research with social media data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:79:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000276
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041626000276
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101839?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:79:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.