IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/9uvzw.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact investing and the politics of leverage: towards a meso-level perspective on derisking

Author

Listed:
  • Golka, Philipp

Abstract

Scholars of financialization are increasingly turning to the role of the state in creating and supporting financial markets. The notion of the derisking state has been proposed to make sense of various state activities that alter the risk/returns of private investments in a hope to attract private capital. Despite its important contributions, the current under-standing of the derisking state as a macrofinancial phenomenon leaves key questions regarding the role of democratic politics unanswered. To address this question, this chapter argues for an analytical shift towards the politics of leverage, that is, how derisking is made politically beneficial. Drawing on an in-depth, qualitative case study of social impact investing in Britain where considerable subsidies have been paid in a hope to attract private investments to various issues of social welfare, this chapter shows how the amplitude of subsidies can be accounted for by a gradual, meso-level development that affected the political favorability of derisking policies. This also shows how institutional entrepreneurs exploit the unique malleability of the impact investing label to navigate challenging political terrains to mobilize subsidies.

Suggested Citation

  • Golka, Philipp, 2023. "Impact investing and the politics of leverage: towards a meso-level perspective on derisking," SocArXiv 9uvzw, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:9uvzw
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/9uvzw
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/655257f5874c2e000e4e7d31/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/9uvzw?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philipp Golka & Natascha van der Zwan, 2022. "Experts versus representatives? Financialised valuation and institutional change in financial governance," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 1017-1030, November.
    2. Daniela Gabor, 2021. "The Wall Street Consensus," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 429-459, May.
    3. David Pinzur, 2021. "Infrastructural power: discretion and the dynamics of infrastructure in action," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(6), pages 644-661, November.
    4. Eve Chiapello, 2023. "Impact finance: how social and environmental questions are addressed in times of financialized capitalism," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 199-220, July.
    5. Stefanie Tan & Alec Fraser & Neil McHugh & Mildred E. Warner, 2021. "Widening perspectives on social impact bonds," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 1-10, January.
    6. Pepper D. Culpepper & Raphael Reinke, 2014. "Structural Power and Bank Bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States," Politics & Society, , vol. 42(4), pages 427-454, December.
    7. Emma Dowling, 2017. "In the wake of austerity: social impact bonds and the financialisation of the welfare state in Britain," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 294-310, May.
    8. Fligstein, Neil, 2001. "Social Skill and the Theory of Fields," Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics, Working Paper Series qt26m187b1, Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics of theInstitute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley.
    9. Jacob S. Hacker & Paul Pierson, 2010. "Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States," Politics & Society, , vol. 38(2), pages 152-204, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lisa Kastner, 2017. "Business lobbying under salience," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-02187871, HAL.
    2. Lisa Kastner, 2017. "Business lobbying under salience," Post-Print hal-02187871, HAL.
    3. Winecoff William Kindred, 2015. "Structural power and the global financial crisis: a network analytical approach," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 495-525, October.
    4. Rosella Carè & Stella Carè & Nathalie Lévy & Rabia Fatima, 2023. "Missing finance in social impact bond research? A bibliometric overview between past and future research," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2101-2120, September.
    5. Braun, Benjamin, 2021. "From exit to control: The structural power of finance under asset manager capitalism," SocArXiv 4uesc, Center for Open Science.
    6. Paweł Mikołajczak, 2023. "Comparative study of social impact bonds – capital per beneficiary and scheme duration," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 54(2), pages 191-220.
    7. Ali Rıza Güngen, 2023. "New Multilateral Development Banks and Green Lending: Approaching Scalar Complexities in the Global South," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(2), pages 251-279, March.
    8. Modell, Sven & Yang, ChunLei, 2018. "Financialisation as a strategic action field: An historically informed field study of governance reforms in Chinese state-owned enterprises," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-59.
    9. Trzcinski, Eileen & Holst, Elke, 2011. "A Critique and Reframing of Personality in Labour Market Theory: Locus of Control and Labour Market Outcomes," IZA Discussion Papers 6090, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Luigi Romano & Marcello Ruberti, 2019. "Focus on the Performances of the Most Advanced Italian Thermoelectric Power Plants," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 264-273.
    11. Reeves, Aaron & McKee, Martin & Basu, Sanjay & Stuckler, David, 2014. "The political economy of austerity and healthcare: Cross-national analysis of expenditure changes in 27 European nations 1995–2011," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 1-8.
    12. Theine, Hendrik, 2019. "The media coverage of wealth and inheritance taxation in Germany," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 290, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    13. Elsässer, Lea & Hense, Svenja & Schäfer, Armin, 2018. "Government of the people, by the elite, for the rich: Unequal responsiveness in an unlikely case," MPIfG Discussion Paper 18/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    14. Merkel, Janet & Suwala, Lech, 2021. "Intermediaries, work and creativity in creative and innovative sectors. The case of Berlin," EconStor Open Access Book Chapters, in: Culture, Creativity and Economy. Collaborative practices, value creation and spaces of creativity., pages 56-69, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    15. Bradlow, Benjamin H., 2019. "Weapons Of The Strong: Elite Resistance And The Neo-Apartheid City," SocArXiv g5y3b, Center for Open Science.
    16. Diego A. B. Marconatto & Luciano Barin-Cruz & Eugenio Pedrozo, 2016. "Lending Groups and Different Social Capitals in Developed and Developing Countries," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 20(6), pages 651-672.
    17. Beatrix Futák‐Campbell & Christian Schwieter, 2020. "Practising Populism: How Right‐wing Populists Negotiate Political Competence," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 890-908, July.
    18. Thiemann Matthias, 2016. "The Power of Inaction or Elite Failure? A Comment on Woll’ “The Power of Inaction”," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 31-45, March.
    19. Jain, Sanjay, 2020. "Fumbling to the future? Socio-technical regime change in the recorded music industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Brendan Whitty & Jessica Sklair & Paul Robert Gilbert & Emma Mawdsley & Jo‐Anna Russon & Olivia Taylor, 2023. "Outsourcing the Business of Development: The Rise of For‐profit Consultancies in the UK Aid Sector," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(4), pages 892-917, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:9uvzw. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.