IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/8w9xk_v1.html

Humanizing Telemedicine through Recognition-Based Ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Capodici, Angelo
  • Pirni, Alberto
  • Gadignani, Anna
  • Noci, Francesca
  • Giardelli, Lucia
  • Emdin, Michele
  • Giannoni, Alberto

Abstract

Background: The rapid expansion of telemedicine promises enhanced healthcare access but risks eroding the relational foundations of care, particularly in remote and underserved communities. Standard bioethical frameworks, often focused on principlism, inadequately address the complex intersubjective and systemic challenges posed by digital mediation. There is a need for an ethical framework that centers human dignity and recognition within technologically mediated care. Objective: This perspective paper develops and applies a critical ethical framework for telemedicine grounded in recognition theory, aiming to evaluate how digital systems can support or undermine the recognition of persons, especially in vulnerable contexts. Methods: We synthesize Axel Honneth's recognition theory with insights from relational ethics, phenomenology of illness, and critical disability studies to propose a tripartite framework comprising three interdependent dimensions of recognition: Ascertaining (epistemic recognition of the patient as an embodied knower), Acceptance (normative inclusion respecting vulnerability and difference), and Approval (institutional legitimation of telemedicine as genuine care). We conduct a critical conceptual analysis applying this framework to the Tuscany Health Ecosystem project, a telemedicine initiative in remote Italian regions. Findings: The application of the Ascertaining-Acceptance-Approval framework reveals both the potential of hybrid, community-integrated telemedicine models (like Tuscany's) to foster recognition through nurse-mediated presence and relational continuity, and significant unresolved tensions. These include persistent epistemic compromises, ambiguities in power-sharing and patient choice, undertheorized socioeconomic vulnerabilities, and structural contradictions between relational care demands and system pressures for efficiency (e.g., the efficiency-recognition dilemma, risk of technological solutionism). Conclusion: Recognition theory transforms telemedicine from a purely technical challenge into an ethical-political project. Ensuring digital healthcare humanizes rather than diminishes care requires moving beyond simple access metrics. It demands ethical vigilance focused on hybridity, perpetual reflexivity, and meaningful community participation to ensure technology supports recognition and resists deepening health inequities.

Suggested Citation

  • Capodici, Angelo & Pirni, Alberto & Gadignani, Anna & Noci, Francesca & Giardelli, Lucia & Emdin, Michele & Giannoni, Alberto, 2025. "Humanizing Telemedicine through Recognition-Based Ethics," SocArXiv 8w9xk_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:8w9xk_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/8w9xk_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6902315011becef27796c3a5/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/8w9xk_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mead, Nicola & Bower, Peter, 2000. "Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(7), pages 1087-1110, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyojung Tak & Gregory Ruhnke & Ya-Chen Shih, 2015. "The Association between Patient-Centered Attributes of Care and Patient Satisfaction," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 8(2), pages 187-197, April.
    2. Rathert, Cheryl & Mittler, Jessica N. & Vogus, Timothy J. & Lee, Yuna S.H., 2023. "Better outcomes through patient – Provider therapeutic connections? An exploratory study of proposed mediating variables," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    3. France Légaré & Annette M. O'Connor & Ian D. Graham & Georges A. Wells & Stéphane Tremblay, 2006. "Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework on the Agreement and the Difference between Patients' and Physicians' Decisional Conflict," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(4), pages 373-390, July.
    4. Mitchell, Ellen M.H. & Kwizera, Amata & Usta, Momade & Gebreselassie, Hailemichael, 2010. "Choosing early pregnancy termination methods in Urban Mozambique," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 62-70, July.
    5. Manzer, Jamie L. & Bell, Ann V., 2022. "The limitations of patient-centered care: The case of early long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) removal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    6. May, Carl & Rapley, Tim & Moreira, Tiago & Finch, Tracy & Heaven, Ben, 2006. "Technogovernance: Evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 1022-1030, February.
    7. Ishikawa, Hirono & Hashimoto, Hideki & Kiuchi, Takahiro, 2013. "The evolving concept of “patient-centeredness” in patient–physician communication research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 147-153.
    8. Nor Azmaniza Azizam & Siti Noorsuriani Maon & Leny Suzana & Nor Intan Shamimi Abdul Aziz, 2018. "Factors Influencing Selected Health Outcome among Patients Attending Universiti Teknologi MARA Medical Centre," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(7), pages 500-511, July.
    9. Christina Johnson & Susan Wilhelmsson & Sussanne Börjeson & Malou Lindberg, 2015. "Improvement of communication and interpersonal competence in telenursing – development of a self‐assessment tool," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1489-1501, June.
    10. Eissens van der Laan, M.R. & van Offenbeek, M.A.G. & Broekhuis, H. & Slaets, J.P.J., 2014. "A person-centred segmentation study in elderly care: Towards efficient demand-driven care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 68-76.
    11. de Blok, S.A. & Meijboom, B.R. & Luijkx, K.G. & Schols, J.M.G.A., 2009. "Demand-based provision of housing, welfare and care services to elderly clients : From policy to daily practice through operations management," Other publications TiSEM 363d7bb1-cdc8-49ee-9c07-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Catherine Fullwood & Anne Kennedy & Anne Rogers & Martin Eden & Caroline Gardner & Joanne Protheroe & David Reeves, 2013. "Patients’ Experiences of Shared Decision Making in Primary Care Practices in the United Kingdom," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(1), pages 26-36, January.
    13. Manuela Lombardi & Marzia Ventura & Concetta Lucia Cristofaro & Rocco Reina & Sabrina Cenciarelli & Sergio Parrocchia & Giuseppe Ciarlo & Assunta Lombardi, 2024. "Organizzare l?azienda Sanitaria di Latina alla luce del DM77: analisi ed esperienze," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2024(129), pages 175-195.
    14. Ngai, Steven Sek-yum & Jiang, Shan & Cheung, Chau-kiu & Wang, Lin & Tang, Hon-yin, 2021. "Trust in mutual aid group members, self-management of chronic illness, and well-being among young patients with chronic illness in Hong Kong," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    15. Judith E Arnetz & Ludmila Zhdanova, 2015. "Patient involvement climate: views and behaviours among registered nurses in myocardial infarction care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 475-485, February.
    16. repec:plo:pone00:0141978 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Macq, Jean & Solis, Alejandro & Martinez, Guillermo & Martiny, Patrick & Dujardin, Bruno, 2005. "An exploration of the social stigma of tuberculosis in five "municipios" of Nicaragua to reflect on local interventions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 205-217, October.
    18. Kreuzer, Maria & Cado, Vesna & Raïes, Karine, 2020. "Moments of care: How interpersonal interactions contribute to luxury experiences of healthcare consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 482-490.
    19. Janice Gandy & Erika Metzler Sawin & Sharon Zook & Lynne Eggert, 2019. "Improving Adherence to Mental Health Treatment in a Low-Income Clinic," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, May.
    20. Michael Brown & Edward McCann & Gráinne Donohue & Caroline Hollins Martin & Freda McCormick, 2021. "LGBTQ+ Psychosocial Concerns in Nursing and Midwifery Education Programmes: Qualitative Findings from a Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-16, October.
    21. Duffy, Conor M.C. & Bú, Emerson Do & Pereira, Cícero Roberto & Madeira, Filipa & Hagiwara, Nao, 2024. "Healthcare providers’ psychological investment in clinical recommendations: Investigating the role of implicit racial attitudes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:8w9xk_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.