IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v33y2013i1p26-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients’ Experiences of Shared Decision Making in Primary Care Practices in the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Fullwood
  • Anne Kennedy
  • Anne Rogers
  • Martin Eden
  • Caroline Gardner
  • Joanne Protheroe
  • David Reeves

Abstract

Background . Shared decision making (SDM) and patient self-management support are key components of US and UK policy for chronic disease management, whereby SDM is seen as enhancing physician-patient negotiation around self-management. The WISE trial is implementing training in self-management support for primary care physicians in one UK region. This article describes preintervention levels of patient-reported SDM and explores how this varies with patient and practice characteristics. Methods . We analyzed baseline data from a cluster randomized controlled trial for 2965 patients with diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) from 29 family practices. Patient-level measures included self-report of chronic conditions, SDM (Health Care Climate Questionnaire [HCCQ]), health status, and demographic characteristics. Area and practice characteristics included chronic disease workload and socioeconomic deprivation. Results . The mean SDM score was 75 (out of 100), but the range was wide. The mean score was lower for IBS patients but did not vary with other disease conditions. Younger patients and those with poorer health status reported lower degrees of SDM. No associations were found with practice characteristics. Limitations . The study was restricted to one socioeconomically deprived region, and hence results may not be nationally representative of the United Kingdom. Ceiling effects on SDM scores may limit the utility of the HCCQ. Conclusions . Lower ratings from some patient groups may reflect differences in expectations rather than differences in physician behavior. Overall levels of SDM were high, and no patient or practice characteristic represented a serious barrier to SDM. However, we cannot say to what extent SDM in this chronic population addressed self-management issues rather than clinical care. More nuanced measures of SDM are required that distinguish between different forms of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Fullwood & Anne Kennedy & Anne Rogers & Martin Eden & Caroline Gardner & Joanne Protheroe & David Reeves, 2013. "Patients’ Experiences of Shared Decision Making in Primary Care Practices in the United Kingdom," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(1), pages 26-36, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:33:y:2013:i:1:p:26-36
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X12464825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X12464825
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X12464825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mead, Nicola & Bower, Peter, 2000. "Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(7), pages 1087-1110, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyojung Tak & Gregory Ruhnke & Ya-Chen Shih, 2015. "The Association between Patient-Centered Attributes of Care and Patient Satisfaction," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 8(2), pages 187-197, April.
    2. France Légaré & Annette M. O'Connor & Ian D. Graham & Georges A. Wells & Stéphane Tremblay, 2006. "Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework on the Agreement and the Difference between Patients' and Physicians' Decisional Conflict," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(4), pages 373-390, July.
    3. Mitchell, Ellen M.H. & Kwizera, Amata & Usta, Momade & Gebreselassie, Hailemichael, 2010. "Choosing early pregnancy termination methods in Urban Mozambique," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 62-70, July.
    4. Manzer, Jamie L. & Bell, Ann V., 2022. "The limitations of patient-centered care: The case of early long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) removal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    5. May, Carl & Rapley, Tim & Moreira, Tiago & Finch, Tracy & Heaven, Ben, 2006. "Technogovernance: Evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 1022-1030, February.
    6. Ishikawa, Hirono & Hashimoto, Hideki & Kiuchi, Takahiro, 2013. "The evolving concept of “patient-centeredness” in patient–physician communication research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 147-153.
    7. Nor Azmaniza Azizam & Siti Noorsuriani Maon & Leny Suzana & Nor Intan Shamimi Abdul Aziz, 2018. "Factors Influencing Selected Health Outcome among Patients Attending Universiti Teknologi MARA Medical Centre," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(7), pages 500-511, July.
    8. Christina Johnson & Susan Wilhelmsson & Sussanne Börjeson & Malou Lindberg, 2015. "Improvement of communication and interpersonal competence in telenursing – development of a self‐assessment tool," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1489-1501, June.
    9. Eissens van der Laan, M.R. & van Offenbeek, M.A.G. & Broekhuis, H. & Slaets, J.P.J., 2014. "A person-centred segmentation study in elderly care: Towards efficient demand-driven care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 68-76.
    10. de Blok, S.A. & Meijboom, B.R. & Luijkx, K.G. & Schols, J.M.G.A., 2009. "Demand-based provision of housing, welfare and care services to elderly clients : From policy to daily practice through operations management," Other publications TiSEM 363d7bb1-cdc8-49ee-9c07-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Ngai, Steven Sek-yum & Jiang, Shan & Cheung, Chau-kiu & Wang, Lin & Tang, Hon-yin, 2021. "Trust in mutual aid group members, self-management of chronic illness, and well-being among young patients with chronic illness in Hong Kong," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    12. Judith E Arnetz & Ludmila Zhdanova, 2015. "Patient involvement climate: views and behaviours among registered nurses in myocardial infarction care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 475-485, February.
    13. Macq, Jean & Solis, Alejandro & Martinez, Guillermo & Martiny, Patrick & Dujardin, Bruno, 2005. "An exploration of the social stigma of tuberculosis in five "municipios" of Nicaragua to reflect on local interventions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 205-217, October.
    14. Kreuzer, Maria & Cado, Vesna & Raïes, Karine, 2020. "Moments of care: How interpersonal interactions contribute to luxury experiences of healthcare consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 482-490.
    15. Janice Gandy & Erika Metzler Sawin & Sharon Zook & Lynne Eggert, 2019. "Improving Adherence to Mental Health Treatment in a Low-Income Clinic," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, May.
    16. Michael Brown & Edward McCann & Gráinne Donohue & Caroline Hollins Martin & Freda McCormick, 2021. "LGBTQ+ Psychosocial Concerns in Nursing and Midwifery Education Programmes: Qualitative Findings from a Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Murdoch, Jamie & Salter, Charlotte & Ford, John & Lenaghan, Elizabeth & Shiner, Alice & Steel, Nicholas, 2020. "The “unknown territory” of goal-setting: Negotiating a novel interactional activity within primary care doctor-patient consultations for patients with multiple chronic conditions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    18. Greenfield, Geva & Pliskin, Joseph S. & Feder-Bubis, Paula & Wientroub, Shlomo & Davidovitch, Nadav, 2012. "Patient–physician relationships in second opinion encounters – The physicians’ perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(7), pages 1202-1212.
    19. Victoria Tischler & Karen D'Silva & Anna Cheetham & Mervin Goring & Tim Calton, 2010. "Involving Patients in Research: the Challenge of Patient-Centredness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 56(6), pages 623-633, November.
    20. Hardman, Doug & Ongaro, Giulio, 2020. "Subjunctive medicine: A manifesto," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:33:y:2013:i:1:p:26-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.