IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/84cj7_v1.html

Staged financing beyond the venture record: Equity rounds in the accounts of Italian SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Leogrande, Angelo
  • di Molfetta, Mauro
  • Notarnicola, Valeria
  • Trotta, Maria Giovanna
  • Plantamura, Antonio Volpe

Abstract

Almost everything known about equity rounds in young firms comes from the records of professional investors, so the evidence is selected on the presence of an intermediary. We read rounds instead from the share-premium reserve, a compulsory, disclosed and restricted line of the Italian statutory balance sheet, for 3,225 certified innovative SMEs over 2016–2025: 2,991 priced capital increases on 1,330 firms. Firms about to raise grew twice as fast in the preceding year and held identical cash, yet six in ten closed it at a loss; profitability falls and intangible assets rise only after the round. Seven panel estimators place the association across firms and not within them; a taxonomy estimated blind to the event finds the mechanism in all five financial configurations, with incidence differing eightfold; six flexible learners fail to improve on the linear specification. Selection operates on growth, not on profitability, a distinction intermediated samples cannot see.

Suggested Citation

  • Leogrande, Angelo & di Molfetta, Mauro & Notarnicola, Valeria & Trotta, Maria Giovanna & Plantamura, Antonio Volpe, 2026. "Staged financing beyond the venture record: Equity rounds in the accounts of Italian SMEs," SocArXiv 84cj7_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:84cj7_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/84cj7_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6aaa490e6cf83e1782fd256c/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/84cj7_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giuliana Borello & Veronica De Crescenzo & Flavio Pichler, 2015. "The Funding Gap and The Role of Financial Return Crowdfunding: Some Evidence From European Platforms," Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, Nahum Goldmann, vol. 20(01), pages 01-20.
    2. Kilian, Lutz & Zhou, Xiaoqing, 2024. "Heterogeneity in the pass-through from oil to gasoline prices: A new instrument for estimating the price elasticity of gasoline demand," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    3. Lukeš, Martin & Longo, Maria Cristina & Zouhar, Jan, 2019. "Do business incubators really enhance entrepreneurial growth? Evidence from a large sample of innovative Italian start-ups," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 82, pages 25-34.
    4. Laurence Booth & Christos Ntantamis & Jun Zhou, 2015. "Financial Constraints, R&D Investment, and the Value of Cash Holdings," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(04), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Brown, James R. & Petersen, Bruce C., 2011. "Cash holdings and R&D smoothing," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 694-709, June.
    6. Giuseppe Albanese & Raffaello Bronzini, 2026. "The impact of public incentives on the birth of innovative start-ups," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 1309-1332, March.
    7. Mikkelson, Wayne H. & Partch, M. Megan, 2003. "Do Persistent Large Cash Reserves Hinder Performance?," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(2), pages 275-294, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane & Mansi, Sattar & Wang, He (Helen), 2023. "Economic policy uncertainty, institutional environments, and corporate cash holdings," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Duo Xu & Christopher Gan & Zhaohua Li & Pengcheng Wang, 2021. "Earnings, Working Capital and Dividend Payout: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 22(2), pages 421-449, November.
    3. Afonso, Oscar & Pinho, Mafalda, 2022. "How to reverse a negative asymmetric labor productivity shock in the European Union? A directed technical change analysis with fiscal and monetary policies," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 47-67.
    4. Itzkowitz, Jennifer, 2013. "Customers and cash: How relationships affect suppliers' cash holdings," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 159-180.
    5. Ahrends, Meike & Drobetz, Wolfgang & Puhan, Tatjana Xenia, 2018. "Cyclicality of growth opportunities and the value of cash holdings," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 74-96.
    6. Liu, Guangqiang & Zhang, Lingyun & Xie, Ziqin, 2022. "Environmental taxes and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Óscar Afonso, 2022. "Growth and wage effects of the monetary policy," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4058-4084, October.
    8. Berentsen, Aleksander & Rojas Breu, Mariana & Shi, Shouyong, 2012. "Liquidity, innovation and growth," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(8), pages 721-737.
    9. Banerjee, Rajabrata & Gupta, Kartick, 2021. "Do country or firm-specific factors matter more to R&D spending in firms?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 75-95.
    10. Maurizio Rocca & Raffaele Staglianò & Tiziana Rocca & Alfio Cariola & Ekaterina Skatova, 2019. "Cash holdings and SME performance in Europe: the role of firm-specific and macroeconomic moderators," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 1051-1078, December.
    11. Ahmed, Mohamed Shaker & Kumar, Satish & Gupta, Prashant & Bamel, Nisha, 2024. "CEO media coverage and cash holdings," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Oscar Afonso, 2023. "Losers and losses of COVID-19: a directed technical change analysis with fiscal and monetary policies," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1777-1821, June.
    13. Xuefeng Shao & Longqi Wang & Xinda Li, 2024. "Financial asset allocations, economic policy uncertainty, and enterprise digital transformation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(4), pages 2613-2626, June.
    14. Huang, Winifred & Mazouz, Khelifa, 2018. "Excess cash, trading continuity, and liquidity risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 275-291.
    15. Oscar Afonso & Rosa Forte, 2023. "How powerful are fiscal and monetary policies in a directed technical change model with humans and robots?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 3008-3032, July.
    16. Afonso, Óscar & Sochirca, Elena & Neves, Pedro Cunha, 2025. "Robots and humans: The role of fiscal and monetary policies in an endogenous growth model," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 49-59.
    17. Nason, Robert S. & Patel, Pankaj C., 2016. "Is cash king? Market performance and cash during a recession," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4242-4248.
    18. Oscar Afonso & Pedro G. Lima, 2023. "Effects of monetary policy on the skill premium and the growth rate in a directed technical change model with heterogeneous cash‐in‐advance constraints," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 4020-4036, October.
    19. Efstathios Magerakis & Konstantinos Gkillas & Christos Floros & George Peppas, 2022. "Corporate R&D intensity and high cash holdings: post-crisis analysis," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3767-3808, September.
    20. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:84cj7_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.