IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/4ygux.html

Exposure to Opposing Views can Increase Political Polarization: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment on Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Bail, Christopher A.
  • Argyle, Lisa
  • Brown, Taylor
  • Bumpus, John
  • Chen, Haohan
  • Hunzaker, M.B. Fallin

    (New York University)

  • Lee, Jaemin
  • Mann, Marcus
  • Merhout, Friedolin
  • Volfovsky, Alexander

Abstract

There is mounting concern that social media sites contribute to political polarization by creating "echo chambers" that insulate people from opposing views about current events. We surveyed a large sample of Democrats and Republicans who visit Twitter at least three times each week about a range of social policy issues. One week later, we randomly assigned respondents to a treatment condition in which they were offered financial incentives to follow a Twitter bot for one month that exposed them to messages produced by elected officials, organizations, and other opinion leaders with opposing political ideologies. Respondents were re-surveyed at the end of the month to measure the effect of this treatment, and at regular intervals throughout the study period to monitor treatment compliance. We find that Republicans who followed a liberal Twitter bot became substantially more conservative post-treatment, and Democrats who followed a conservative Twitter bot became slightly more liberal post-treatment. These findings have important implications for the interdisciplinary literature on political polarization as well as the emerging field of computational social science.

Suggested Citation

  • Bail, Christopher A. & Argyle, Lisa & Brown, Taylor & Bumpus, John & Chen, Haohan & Hunzaker, M.B. Fallin & Lee, Jaemin & Mann, Marcus & Merhout, Friedolin & Volfovsky, Alexander, 2018. "Exposure to Opposing Views can Increase Political Polarization: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment on Social Media," SocArXiv 4ygux, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:4ygux
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/4ygux
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5ab2650dfb9476000c2a3454/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/4ygux?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Abadie & Susan Athey & Guido W Imbens & Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2023. "When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 138(1), pages 1-35.
    2. Imbens,Guido W. & Rubin,Donald B., 2015. "Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521885881.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gemayel, Roland & Preda, Alex, 2018. "Does a scopic regime erode the disposition effect? Evidence from a social trading platform," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 175-190.
    2. Thomas Feliciani & Jochem Tolsma & Andreas Flache, 2023. "Ethnic segregation and spatial patterns of attitudes: studying the link using register data and social simulation," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 877-921, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Abadie & Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2020. "Sampling‐Based versus Design‐Based Uncertainty in Regression Analysis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 265-296, January.
    2. Camargo Juliana & Lima Lycia & Riva Flavio & Souza André Portela, 2021. "Technical Education, Non-cognitive Skills and Labor Market Outcomes: Experimental Evidence from Brazil," IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Sciendo & Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, January.
    3. Cappelletti, Matilde & Giuffrida, Leonardo M., 2022. "Targeted bidders in government tenders," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-030, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Francetic, I.; & Meacock, R.; & Siciliani, L.; & Sutton, M.;, 2024. "Disorderly queues: How does unexpected demand affect queue prioritisation in emergency care?," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 24/14, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    5. MacKinnon, James G. & Nielsen, Morten Ørregaard & Webb, Matthew D., 2023. "Cluster-robust inference: A guide to empirical practice," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 272-299.
    6. Derksen, Laura & Kerwin, Jason Theodore & Reynoso, Natalia Ordaz & Sterck, Olivier, 2021. "Appointments: A More Effective Commitment Device for Health Behaviors," SocArXiv y8gh7, Center for Open Science.
    7. Hirschauer, Norbert & Grüner, Sven & Mußhoff, Oliver & Becker, Claudia & Jantsch, Antje, 2020. "Can p-values be meaningfully interpreted without random sampling?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14, pages 71-91.
    8. Waseem, Mazhar, 2023. "Overclaimed refunds, undeclared sales, and invoice mills: Nature and extent of noncompliance in a value-added tax," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    9. Clément de Chaisemartin & Jaime Ramirez-Cuellar, 2024. "At What Level Should One Cluster Standard Errors in Paired and Small-Strata Experiments?," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(1), pages 193-212, January.
    10. Riccardo Turati, 2025. "Networks abroad and culture: global individual-level evidence," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 38(1), pages 1-42, March.
    11. Ashesh Rambachan & Neil Shephard, 2019. "When do common time series estimands have nonparametric causal meaning?," Papers 1903.01637, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    12. Rojas, Christian & Cengiz, Ezgi, 2025. "Can nonprofit target-setting mechanisms drive for-profit compliance? Evidence from sodium content," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. repec:osf:socarx:4ygux_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Emaad Manzoor & Nikhil Malik, 2023. "Designing Effective Music Excerpts," Papers 2309.14475, arXiv.org.
    15. Koerner, Konstantin & Borrs, Linda & Eppelsheimer, Johann, 2023. "FDI and onshore job stability: Upgrades, downgrades, and separations in multinationals," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Rachel Cassidy & Anaya Dam & Wendy Janssens & Umair Kiani & Karlijn Morsink, 2024. "Targeting men, women or both to reduce child marriage," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-087/V, Tinbergen Institute, revised 22 Oct 2024.
    17. Matthias Breuer & Ed Dehaan, 2024. "Using and Interpreting Fixed Effects Models," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 62(4), pages 1183-1226, September.
    18. Peter Z. Schochet, 2022. "Statistical Power for Estimating Treatment Effects Using Difference-in-Differences and Comparative Interrupted Time Series Estimators With Variation in Treatment Timing," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 47(4), pages 367-405, August.
    19. Dmitry Arkhangelsky & Guido Imbens, 2023. "Causal Models for Longitudinal and Panel Data: A Survey," Papers 2311.15458, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    20. Michael T. Baker & Susan P. Carter & Abigail Wozniak, 2024. "Peer Effects and Marriage Formation," Opportunity and Inclusive Growth Institute Working Papers 107, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    21. Fangzhou Su & Peng Ding, 2021. "Model‐assisted analyses of cluster‐randomized experiments," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(5), pages 994-1015, November.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:4ygux. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.