IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/metaar/cwftm_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Open Science in Impact Evaluation: What Impact Evaluators can Learn from the Replication Crisis in Social Psychology

Author

Listed:
  • McNamee, Ben
  • Forscher, Patrick S.

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Lenczner, Michael

Abstract

Since 2011, the academic field of social psychology has been undergoing a crisis of confidence in its results. This so-called "replication crisis" has inspired a widespread examination of the practices that can lead to less than credible results, the incentives that inspire such practices, and the practices that could protect or enhance research credibility. We believe that the credibility of the field of impact evaluation may be similarly threatened by incentives to use poor research practices. We assess the history of both social psychology and impact evaluation and conclude that, although the source of the incentives for impact evaluators is different in kind than those for social psychologists, impact evaluators may be similarly incentivized to make their results look better than they really are. We review three parallels in the history of the two fields, including the use of research as sales, the pressurized, competitive environments in which the work takes place, and the use of research methods as rhetorical devices. Impact evaluators may be able to learn from the credibility-enhancing solutions that worked for social psychology, though the field can consider new tools, such as standards, investment mechanisms, administrative data labs, and innovations inevidence-sharing and synthesis. Rather than sleepwalking through a crisis we cannot see, impact evaluators should consider that their field may be in crisis, a crisis that may require widespread and collective efforts –a credibility renaissance – to discover and deploy methods to protect its legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • McNamee, Ben & Forscher, Patrick S. & Lenczner, Michael, 2025. "Open Science in Impact Evaluation: What Impact Evaluators can Learn from the Replication Crisis in Social Psychology," MetaArXiv cwftm_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:metaar:cwftm_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/cwftm_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/67dfba69bb0557890f053b5a/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/cwftm_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Miguel & Michael Kremer, 2004. "Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 159-217, January.
    2. Lant Pritchett, 2002. "It pays to be ignorant: A simple political economy of rigorous program evaluation," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 251-269.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hunt Allcott, 2012. "Site Selection Bias in Program Evaluation," NBER Working Papers 18373, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Cristina Corduneanu-Huci & Michael T. Dorsch & Paul Maarek, 2017. "Learning to constrain: Political competition and randomized controlled trials in development," THEMA Working Papers 2017-24, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    3. David K. Evans & Arkadipta Ghosh, 2008. "Prioritizing Educational Investments in Children in the Developing World," Working Papers WR-587, RAND Corporation.
    4. Battaglia, Marianna & Lebedinski, Lara, 2015. "Equal Access to Education: An Evaluation of the Roma Teaching Assistant Program in Serbia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 62-81.
    5. Verónica Amarante & Marco Manacorda & Edward Miguel & Andrea Vigorito, 2016. "Do Cash Transfers Improve Birth Outcomes? Evidence from Matched Vital Statistics, Program, and Social Security Data," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-43, May.
    6. Kirill Borusyak & Peter Hull & Xavier Jaravel, 2025. "Design-based identification with formula instruments: a review," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 28(1), pages 83-108.
    7. Mark D. Manuszak & Krzysztof Wozniak, 2017. "The Impact of Price Controls in Two-sided Markets : Evidence from US Debit Card Interchange Fee Regulation," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017-074, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    8. Hoffmann, Bridget, 2018. "Do non-monetary prices target the poor? Evidence from a field experiment in India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 15-32.
    9. Lay, Jann, 2010. "MDG Achievements, Determinants, and Resource Needs: What Has Been Learnt?," GIGA Working Papers 137, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    10. John A. List, 2024. "Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7999), pages 491-499, February.
    11. McNamara, Paul E. & Ulimwengu, John M. & Leonard, Kenneth L., 2010. "Do health investments improve agricultural productivity? Lessons from agricultural household and health research," IFPRI discussion papers 1012, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Annette N. Brown & Drew B. Cameron & Benjamin D. K. Wood, 2014. "Quality evidence for policymaking: I'll believe it when I see the replication," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 215-235, September.
    13. Randee J Kastner & Elisa Sicuri & Christopher M Stone & Gabriel Matwale & Ambrose Onapa & Fabrizio Tediosi, 2017. "How much will it cost to eradicate lymphatic filariasis? An analysis of the financial and economic costs of intensified efforts against lymphatic filariasis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Tanguy Bernard & Sylvie Lambert & Karen Macours & Margaux Vinez, 2019. "Adoption of Improved Seeds, Evidence from DRC," Working Papers halshs-02422695, HAL.
    15. Janet Currie & Tom Vogl, 2013. "Early-Life Health and Adult Circumstance in Developing Countries," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 5(1), pages 1-36, May.
    16. Brown, Drusilla K. & Downes, Thomas & Eggleston, Karen & Kumari, Ratna, 2009. "Human Resource Management Technology Diffusion through Global Supply Chains: Buyer-directed Factory-based Health Care in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1484-1493, September.
    17. Philipp Ager & Casper Worm Hansen & Peter Z. Lin, 2023. "Medical Technology and Life Expectancy: Evidence from the Antitoxin Treatment of Diphtheria," Working Papers 0241, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).
    18. Ellis, Jimmy R. & Gershenson, Seth, 2016. "LATE for the Meeting: Gender, Peer Advising, and College Success," IZA Discussion Papers 9956, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Aggarwal, Khushboo & Barua, Rashmi & Vidal-Fernandez, Marian, 2024. "Still Waters Run Deep: Groundwater Contamination and Education Outcomes in India," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    20. Martin, Will, 2021. "Tools for measuring the full impacts of agricultural interventions," IFPRI-MCC technical papers 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:metaar:cwftm_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.