IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/africa/9rhfu.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Digital Transformation: Towards a model for competency-based governance of digital transformation for boards of directors in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Siwahla-Madiba, Nandipha Daphne
  • Costa, King

    (Global Centre for Academic Research)

Abstract

The requirement for directors of boards to attain competencies in relation to governance of digital transformation is evidently increasing at global level. South Africa, as a player within the global economic landscape, cannot afford to have directors who do not understand the requisite competencies required for governance of digital transformation. Whereas many organisations and boards have implemented new corporate governance codes, principles, and standards, as well as new company legislation, frameworks or models on governance of digital transformation are not yet integrated into functional board activities. This study was hinged upon an interpretivist epistemology, with a case study design used as a strategy for inquiry. Using purposive sampling approach, a total of seven participants were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Ethical considerations were followed in terms of the institutional requirements and participants were requested to sign consent forms for participating in this study. Implications of participations were clearly articulated to participants and their right to discontinue participation at any time was proffered. In this study, their participation is referred to as “Participant” followed by a number, which does not reflect the order of their participation, but to provide anonymity. Data was analysed through a thematic approach, using the COSTA QDA technique on webQDA software. The study findings culminated in three main themes as follows: • There is no standard definition of competence-based models for governance of digital transformation • Governance of digital transformation is perceived as governance of information technology (IT) • There is a need for digital transformation competence at board level Discussion of the meanings attached to these themes resulted in a development of a model entitled MADIBA Model, which is an acronym for six constructs that could be used to guide establishment of a competency model for governance of digital transformation by directors of different boards. Study limitations were mainly due to the fact that only a subjective approach to the inquiry was followed, justified by the fact that the researcher sought to explore in-depth views and perspectives of boards of directors in relation to governance of digital transformation competency model. The study further recommended that there could be another study focussing on pragmatic approaches or even positivistic perspectives, to obtain generalised perspectives on the phenomenon.

Suggested Citation

  • Siwahla-Madiba, Nandipha Daphne & Costa, King, 2022. "Digital Transformation: Towards a model for competency-based governance of digital transformation for boards of directors in South Africa," AfricArxiv 9rhfu, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:africa:9rhfu
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/9rhfu
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/637014dd0e715d1d59a995b8/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/9rhfu?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruno Škrinjarić, 2022. "Competence-based approaches in organizational and individual context," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Christine Legner & Torsten Eymann & Thomas Hess & Christian Matt & Tilo Böhmann & Paul Drews & Alexander Mädche & Nils Urbach & Frederik Ahlemann, 2017. "Digitalization: Opportunity and Challenge for the Business and Information Systems Engineering Community," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(4), pages 301-308, August.
    3. Kristin Behfar & Gerardo A. Okhuysen, 2018. "Perspective—Discovery Within Validation Logic: Deliberately Surfacing, Complementing, and Substituting Abductive Reasoning in Hypothetico-Deductive Inquiry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 323-340, April.
    4. Max Bankewitz & Carl Aberg & Christine Teuchert, 2016. "Digitalization and Boards of Directors: A New Era of Corporate Governance?," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 58-69, June.
    5. Charles Kivunja & Ahmed Bawa Kuyini, 2017. "Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(5), pages 1-26, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Severin Oesterle & Arne Buchwald & Nils Urbach, 2022. "Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: empirical findings of a matched pair analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 571-597, June.
    2. Hui Fang & Chunyu Jiang & Tufail Hussain & Xiaoye Zhang & Qixin Huo, 2022. "Input Digitization of the Manufacturing Industry and Carbon Emission Intensity Based on Testing the World and Developing Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Jan Marco Leimeister & Stefan Stieglitz & Martin Matzner & Dennis Kundisch & Christoph Flath & Maximilian Röglinger, 2021. "Quo Vadis Conferences in the Business and Information Systems Engineering (BISE) Community After Covid," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(6), pages 741-749, December.
    4. H. Latan & C.J. Chiappetta Jabbour & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & M. Ali, 2023. "Crossing the Red Line? Empirical Evidence and Useful Recommendations on Questionable Research Practices among Business Scholars," Post-Print hal-04276024, HAL.
    5. Hossein Rahnama & Kerstin Johansen & Lisa Larsson & Anna Öhrwall Rönnbäck, 2022. "Collaboration in Value Constellations for Sustainable Production: The Perspective of Small Technology Solution Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Daniel A. Skog & Henrik Wimelius & Johan Sandberg, 2018. "Digital Disruption," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(5), pages 431-437, October.
    7. Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu & Nüfer Yasin Ateş, 2022. "Arguing to Defeat: Eristic Argumentation and Irrationality in Resolving Moral Concerns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 519-535, January.
    8. Joanna Sleigh & Shannon Hubbs & Alessandro Blasimme & Effy Vayena, 2024. "Can digital tools foster ethical deliberation?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Peter Mertens & Martin Wiener, 2018. "Riding the Digitalization Wave: Toward a Sustainable Nomenclature in Wirtschaftsinformatik," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(4), pages 367-372, August.
    10. Emilio J. Castilla & Aruna Ranganathan, 2020. "The Production of Merit: How Managers Understand and Apply Merit in the Workplace," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 909-935, July.
    11. Marija Jović & Edvard Tijan & Doroteja Vidmar & Andreja Pucihar, 2022. "Factors of Digital Transformation in the Maritime Transport Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Bora Ly, 2024. "The Interplay of Digital Transformational Leadership, Organizational Agility, and Digital Transformation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4408-4427, March.
    13. Tracy Anderson & Matthew Bidwell, 2019. "Outside Insiders: Understanding the Role of Contracting in the Careers of Managerial Workers," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 1000-1029, September.
    14. Möhlmann, Mareike, 2021. "Unjustified trust beliefs: Trust conflation on sharing economy platforms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    15. Dr Sidney Kawimbe & Ms Buumba Banda, 2023. "Qualitative Analysis of Early Pension Withdrawal in Defined Benefit Schemes: A Case National Pension Scheme Authority (NAPSA)," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(12), pages 1839-1860, December.
    16. Rongrong Zhou & Decai Tang & Dan Da & Wenya Chen & Lin Kong & Valentina Boamah, 2022. "Research on China’s Manufacturing Industry Moving towards the Middle and High-End of the GVC Driven by Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, June.
    17. Timo Jakobi & Maximilian Grafenstein & Christine Legner & Clément Labadie & Peter Mertens & Ayten Öksüz & Gunnar Stevens, 2020. "The Role of IS in the Conflicting Interests Regarding GDPR," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(3), pages 261-272, June.
    18. Jianhua Zhu & Julien S. Baker & Zhiting Song & Xiao-Guang Yue & Wenqi Li, 2023. "Government regulatory policies for digital transformation in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: an evolutionary game analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Jochen Fähndrich, 2023. "A literature review on the impact of digitalisation on management control," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 9-65, March.
    20. Tawila Anamela & Nyawa Msidi Nyirongo & Chaponga Nguluwe, 2024. "The Effect of Rules of Origin on Regional Trade: An Analysis of the Africa Continental Free Trade Area," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(4), pages 550-559, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:africa:9rhfu. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/africarxiv/discover .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.