IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stiaac/8-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public Health in an Age of Genomics

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

This report presents the findings of a research project to investigate the drivers and criteria shaping the application of genomic biotechnology to health in different national settings, and the barriers to implementation nationally and internationally. A case study approach was adopted for the project. The findings are based on the active participation in the survey of seven self-selected countries, including both OECD member and non-member countries (Finland, Israel, Luxembourg, Mexico, the United Kingdom, China and South Africa). The report outlines a number of potentially important patterns that are seen to emerge when the country case studies are set alongside one another and viewed in transnational perspective. The data, albeit based on limited evidence from a small sample of countries, suggest a significant divergence in the way that different countries are tending to adopt genomics for public health, which may have important implications for thinking about how genomic science and technology might best be employed in the interests of global public health.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2013. "Public Health in an Age of Genomics," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 8, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:stiaac:8-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5k424rdzj3bx-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k424rdzj3bx-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5k424rdzj3bx-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. De Clercq, Bart & Pfoertner, Timo-Kolja & Elgar, Frank J. & Hublet, Anne & Maes, Lea, 2014. "Social capital and adolescent smoking in schools and communities: A cross-classified multilevel analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 81-87.
    2. Ioannis Dionysopoulos, 2013. "Olympic Games and their Commercialization," Ekonomika a Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(4).
    3. Patel, Madhumita & Kumar, Amit, 2016. "Production of renewable diesel through the hydroprocessing of lignocellulosic biomass-derived bio-oil: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1293-1307.
    4. Wouters, Olivier J. & Cylus, Jonathan & Yang, Wei & Thomson, Sarah & McKee, Martin, 2016. "Medical savings accounts: assessing their impact on efficiency, equity, and financial protection in health care," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65448, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Bansal, Vaiddehi & Wallach, Jessica & Lira Brandão, Juliana & Lord, Sarah & Taha, Ninar & Akoglu, Tulay & Kiss, Ligia & Zimmerman, Cathy, 2023. "An intervention-focused review of modern slave labor in Brazil’s mining sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. O’Connell, Adrian & Kousoulidou, Marina & Lonza, Laura & Weindorf, Werner, 2019. "Considerations on GHG emissions and energy balances of promising aviation biofuel pathways," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 504-515.
    7. Ferreira, Ernesto R. & Monteiro, João D. & Manso, José R. Pires, 2018. "Are economic crises age and gender neutral? Evidence from European Union mortality data," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 69-77.
    8. Ines Läufer, 2013. "Private Krankenversicherung in den USA - Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Staat und Markt," Otto-Wolff-Institut Discussion Paper Series 07/2013, Otto-Wolff-Institut für Wirtschaftsordnung, Köln, Deutschland.
    9. Vandersteegen, Tom & Marneffe, Wim & Cleemput, Irina & Vereeck, Lode, 2015. "The impact of no-fault compensation on health care expenditures: An empirical study of OECD countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 367-374.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stiaac:8-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.