IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaab/145-en.html

Ageing and Literacy Skills: Evidence from IALS, ALL And PIAAC

Author

Listed:
  • Garry Barrett

    (University of Sydney)

  • W. Craig Riddell

    (University of British Columbia)

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between age and literacy using data from the International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS), the Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey (ALL) and The Survey of Adult Skills, a product of the OECD Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). A negative partial relationship between literacy and age exists with literacy declining with age, especially after age 45. However, this relationship could reflect some combination of age and birth cohort effects. The analysis shows that in most participating countries the negative literacy-age profile observed in cross-sectional data arises from offsetting ageing and cohort effects. With some exceptions, more recent birth cohorts have lower levels of literacy and individuals from a given birth cohort lose literacy skills after they leave school at a rate greater than indicated by cross-sectional estimates. The results for birth cohort suggest that there is not a general tendency for literacy skills to decline from one generation to the next, but that the majority of the countries examined are doing a poorer job of developing literacy skills in successive generations. Ce document étudie les liens entre l’âge et les compétences à l’écrit, à l’aide de données tirées de l’Enquête internationale sur la littératie des adultes (IALS), de l’Enquête sur la littératie et les compétences des adultes (ALL) et de l’Évaluation des compétences des adultes, lancée dans le cadre du Programme de l’OCDE pour l'évaluation internationale des compétences des adultes (PIAAC). Une corrélation négative partielle entre le niveau à l’écrit et l’âge existe, les compétences dans ce domaine déclinant avec l’âge, surtout après 45 ans, mais cette corrélation pourrait mettre en évidence une combinaison d’effets liés à l’âge et à la cohorte de naissance. L’analyse montre que dans la plupart des pays participants, la corrélation négative observée à partir de données transversales entre les compétences à l’écrit et l’âge est due à des effets de compensation liés au vieillissement et à la cohorte. À certaines exceptions près, les générations plus récentes présentent des niveaux plus faibles à l’écrit et les individus appartenant à une cohorte de naissance donnée perdent leurs compétences à l’écrit après leur scolarité à un rythme plus rapide que ce qu’indiquent les estimations transversales. Les résultats relatifs aux cohortes de naissance semblent indiquer qu’il n’y a pas de déclin général du niveau à l’écrit d’une génération à l’autre, mais que la majorité des pays soumis à l’étude parviennent moins bien à développer les compétences à l’écrit de génération en génération.

Suggested Citation

  • Garry Barrett & W. Craig Riddell, 2016. "Ageing and Literacy Skills: Evidence from IALS, ALL And PIAAC," OECD Education Working Papers 145, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:145-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jlphd2twps1-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlphd2twps1-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jlphd2twps1-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helliar, C.V. & Lowies, B. & Suryawathy, I.G.A. & Whait, R. & Lushington, K., 2022. "The genre of banking financial product information: The characters, the setting, the plot and the story," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(5).
    2. Chyul-Young Jyung & Yoowoo Lee & Sunyoung Park & Eunhye Cho & Romi Choi, 2020. "Factors Affecting Employees’ Problem-Solving Skills in Technology-Rich Environments in Japan and Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Esperanza Vera‑Toscano & Elena C. Meroni, 2021. "Correction to: An Age–Period–Cohort Approach to the Incidence and Evolution of Overeducation and Skills Mismatch," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 779-779, January.
    4. John P. Martin, 2018. "Skills for the 21st Century: Findings and Policy Lessons from the OECD Survey of Adult Skills," Working Papers 201803, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    5. Brindusa Anghel & Aitor Lacuesta, 2020. "Ageing, productivity and employment status," Economic Bulletin, Banco de España, issue 1/2020.
    6. Jelnov, Pavel & Weiss, Yoram, 2022. "Influence in economics and aging," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Flisi, Sara & Goglio, Valentina & Meroni, Elena Claudia & Vera-Toscano, Esperanza, 2019. "Cohort patterns in adult literacy skills: How are new generations doing?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 52-65.
    8. Audra Bowlus & Chris Robinson, 2020. "The evolution of the human capital of women," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 12-42, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:145-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.