IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ocp/pbecon/pb_21_24.html

Classes moyennes au Maroc : Au-delà des perceptions, que disent les chiffres ?

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelkhalek Touhami
  • Dorothee Boccanfuso

Abstract

L'idée d'un effritement de la classe moyenne marocaine est répandue, suggérant un glissement vers une classe aisée toujours plus riche et des classes plus pauvres ce qui sous-entend une augmentation de la polarisation dans la société. Cependant, aucune étude basée sur des données n'a été menée pour confirmer cette perception. Notre étude comble ce vide en analysant l'évolution de la classe moyenne entre 2012 et 2019. En utilisant la définition opérationnelle de Abdelkhalek (2014) de la classe moyenne et les données de l'Enquête Panel de l'ONDH (vagues 2012 et 2019), nous examinons les mesures de la pauvreté, des inégalités et de la polarisation pour tester la véracité de cette perception. Contrairement aux idées reçues, nos résultats indiquent que la classe moyenne n'a pas régressé au niveau national ni selon le milieu de résidence. En réalité, la croissance a été pro-pauvre sur la période. Ceci signifie que les plus pauvres ont bénéficié d'une amélioration relative de leur situation tout comme une grande partie de la classe moyenne. Ces conclusions remettent donc en question la perception d'une classe moyenne en déclin et soulignent l'importance de poursuivre les analyses basées sur des données récentes et probantes pour éclairer les débats sur la structure sociale du Maroc et son évolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelkhalek Touhami & Dorothee Boccanfuso, 2024. "Classes moyennes au Maroc : Au-delà des perceptions, que disent les chiffres ?," Policy briefs on Economic Trends and Policies 2413, Policy Center for the New South.
    • Handle: RePEc:ocp:pbecon:pb_21_24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/2024-05/PB_21_24%20%28T%20ABDELKHALEK%20and%20D%20BOCCANFUSO%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pernia, Ernesto & Kakwani, Nanak, 2000. "What is Pro-poor Growth?," MPRA Paper 104987, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Foster, James & Greer, Joel & Thorbecke, Erik, 1984. "A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 761-766, May.
    3. Esteban, Joan & Ray, Debraj, 1994. "On the Measurement of Polarization," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 819-851, July.
    4. Ravallion, Martin & Chen, Shaohua, 2003. "Measuring pro-poor growth," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 93-99, January.
    5. James Foster & Michael Wolfson, 2014. "Erratum to: Polarization and the decline of the middle class: Canada and the U.S," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 12(3), pages 435-437, September.
    6. Nanak Kakwani & Ernesto M. Pernia, 2000. "What is Pro-poor Growth?," Asian Development Review (ADR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 1-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ocp:ppaper:pb21-24 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Zuobao Wang & Yao Chen & Tianrun Lin & Xinyi Xing, 2024. "The Dynamics of Inequality and Poverty Among Children in Colombia During the COVID-19 Recession," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(2), pages 815-843, April.
    3. Panek, Tomasz, . "Czy wzrost gospodarczy w Polsce w latach 2005 -2015 był korzystny dla ubogich?," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2019(2).
    4. B. Essama‐Nssah & Peter J. Lambert, 2009. "Measuring Pro‐Poorness: A Unifying Approach With New Results," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 55(3), pages 752-778, September.
    5. Peter Warr, 2005. "Pro‐poor Growth," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 19(2), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Jean-Yves Duclos & Paul Makdissi & Abdelkrim Araar, 2009. "Pro-Poor Tax reforms, with an Application to Mexico," Working Papers 0907E, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
    7. Aadil Hameed Shah & Atta Ullah Khan & Liurong Pan & Asad Amin & Abbas Ali Chandio, 2022. "Reflections of Pro-Poor Growth across Agro-Climatic Zones for Farming and Non-Farming Communities: Evidence from Punjab, Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Ravallion, Martin & Chen, Shaohua, 2022. "Fleshing out the olive? Observations on income polarization in China since 1981," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Hyacinth Eme Ichoku & Chukwuma Agu & John Ele-Ojo Ataguba, 2012. "What do we know about pro-poor growth and regional poverty in Nigeria?," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 5(3), pages 147-172, December.
    10. Priyabrata Sahoo & Debolina Biswas & Saswata Guha Thakurata, 2023. "Is Growth Pro-poor Among the States of India? A Poverty Decomposition Exercise During the 2000s," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 107-133, January.
    11. Mwangi S. Kimenyi, 2006. "Economic Reforms and Pro-Poor Growth: Lessons for Africa and other Developing Regions and Economies in Transition," Working papers 2006-02, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    12. Duangkamon Chotikapanich & William E. Griffiths & Gholamreza Hajargasht & Wasana Karunarathne & D. S. Prasada Rao, 2018. "Using the GB2 Income Distribution," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Nanak Kakwani & Hyun H. Son, 2003. "Pro-poor Growth: Concepts and Measurement with Country Case Studies," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 42(4), pages 417-444.
    14. repec:ocp:rpaeco:pb_42-23 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Youssoufou Hamadou Daouda, 2013. "La croissance économique est-elle pro-pauvres au Niger?," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 25(2), pages 203-214, June.
    16. Ahmed Raza Cheema & Aqleema Noor & Jabbar Ul-Haq, 2021. "Do Foreign Remittances Lead To Inclusive Growth In Pakistan?," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 10(2), pages 198-203.
    17. Negre, Mario, 2010. "Concepts and Operationalization of Pro-Poor Growth," WIDER Working Paper Series 047, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Takahiro Akita & Sachiko Miyata, 2020. "Assessing Pro-poorness of Regional Economic Growth: Evidence from Indonesia, 2004-2014," Working Papers EMS_2020_03, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    19. Francis Teal, 2005. "Consumption, Welfare and Well-Being in Ghana in the 1990s," Economics Series Working Papers GPRG-WPS-002, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    20. Dorothée Boccanfuso & Jean Bosco Ki & Caroline Ménard, 2009. "Pro-Poor Growth Measurements in a Multidimensional Model: A Comparative Approach," Cahiers de recherche 09-22, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    21. Sean Higgins & Nora Lustig, 2015. "Can Poverty-Reducing and Progressive Tax and Transfer System Hurt the Poor?," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 1333, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    22. Jean-Yves Duclos, 2009. "What is “Pro-Poor”?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(1), pages 37-58, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ocp:pbecon:pb_21_24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Center for the New South's Customer service The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Policy Center for the New South's Customer service to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ocppcma.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.