IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Monopolistic Security Design in Finance Economies

Listed author(s):
  • Karl Schmedders

The purpose of this paper is to analyze endogenous asset innovation by an entrepreneurial exchange owner in a partial equilibrium model of incomplete security markets with financial transaction fees. A monopolistic market maker has the technology to introduce new securities into the economy and charge investors transaction fees if they trade on the exchange. The market maker's objective is to choose the security and transaction fee that maximize profits when opening the exchange. We compute the effects of asset innovation for the case of an option exchange introducing an option on a stock index. In the first set of economies agents with heterogeneous levels of risk aversion trade securities to achieve some risk sharing. In the second set of economies agents have identical risk aversion but heterogeneous beliefs which lead to trading due to the desire for portfolio re-balancing. In both types of models the introduction of the profit-maximizing options leads to a decrease of the prices of established securities. Typically small heterogeneity of beliefs lead to substantial more trading volume in the option than reasonable differences among levels of risk aversion. Our computational approach allows us to examine some previous results in the theoretical literature for heterogeneous-beliefs models about the effects of an option introduction. We show that these results about options leading to a price increase of the underlying stock depend on some very strong assumptions on the parameters and are quantitatively negligible. Typically an opposite result, namely a price decrease of the underlying stock, of much larger quantitative magnitude holds.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: main text
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science in its series Discussion Papers with number 1288.

in new window

Date of creation: Mar 2000
Handle: RePEc:nwu:cmsems:1288
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Northwestern University, 580 Jacobs Center, 2001 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208-2014

Phone: 847/491-3527
Fax: 847/491-2530
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Email:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Detemple, Jerome B & Selden, Larry, 1991. "A General Equilibrium Analysis of Option and Stock Market Interactions," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 32(2), pages 279-303, May.
  2. Bisin, Alberto, 1998. "General Equilibrium with Endogenously Incomplete Financial Markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 19-45, September.
  3. Detemple, Jerome & Jorion, Philippe, 1990. "Option listing and stock returns : An empirical analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 781-801, October.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwu:cmsems:1288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Fran Walker)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.