IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/new/wpaper/2606.html

Greening unequal? Conceptualising the impacts of the green transition from a global gendered lens

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmin Lukasz

    (School of Accounting, Finance and Economics (SoAFE) and Centre of Political Economy, Governance, Finance and Accountability (PEGFA), University of Greenwich, UK)

  • Maria Nikolaidi

    (School of Accounting, Finance and Economics (SoAFE) and Centre of Political Economy, Governance, Finance and Accountability (PEGFA), University of Greenwich, UK)

  • Özlem Onaran

    (School of Accounting, Finance and Economics (SoAFE) and Centre of Political Economy, Governance, Finance and Accountability (PEGFA), University of Greenwich, UK)

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual framework for an integrated global, sectoral and gendered analysis of the macroeconomic and social dimensions of the green transition with a focus on three critical aspects. The first concerns the uneven global effects of the green transition. Due to differentiated sectoral structures and positions in the global financial architecture, the transition has highly uneven effects across countries: interconnected global production and financial networks can result in the green transition in the Global North having important adverse macrofinancial effects on Global South countries, particularly those reliant on fossil fuel exports, raising climate justice concerns. The second refers to the environmental footprint of green structural change that extends well beyond direct emissions: resource-intensive green activities, such as electric vehicle production, drive ecological degradation through supply chains in Global South producer countries and reinforce green extractivism, making adaptation and the protection of water, land, and biodiversity central for a just green transition. The third is related to the gendered effects of the transition, which can either intensify or reduce existing inequalities through the impact of the green transition on women’s paid and unpaid work. These effects diverge between North and South due to differences in labour informality, exposure to environmental degradation, and the gender composition of ‘green’, ‘fossil’, and ‘purple’ sectors. Drawing on post-Keynesian, ecological, and feminist macroeconomics, as well as the physical and monetary input-output approaches, the paper develops a framework that emphasises international and sectoral spillover effects, macrofinancial channels and the local-specific gendered effects of green policies through paid and unpaid work. Based on this framework, the paper outlines how the combined use of green and purple policies can reduce global, sectoral and gender inequalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasmin Lukasz & Maria Nikolaidi & Özlem Onaran, 2026. "Greening unequal? Conceptualising the impacts of the green transition from a global gendered lens," Working Papers 2606, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:new:wpaper:2606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.economicpolicyresearch.org/econ/2026/NSSR_WP_062026.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:new:wpaper:2606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Setterfield (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/denewus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.