IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/31085.html

Where Have All the "Creative Talents" Gone? Employment Dynamics of US Inventors

Author

Listed:
  • Ufuk Akcigit
  • Nathan Goldschlag

Abstract

How are inventors allocated in the US economy and does that allocation affect innovative capacity? To answer these questions, we first build a model of creative destruction where an inventor with a new idea has the possibility to work for an entrant or incumbent firm. If the inventor works for the entrant the innovation is implemented and the entrant displaces the incumbent firm. Strategic considerations encourage the incumbent to hire the inventor, offering higher wages, and then not implement the inventor's idea. To test this prediction, we combine data on the employment history of over 760 thousand U.S. inventors with information on jobs from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program at the U.S. Census Bureau. Our results show that (i) inventors are increasingly concentrated in large incumbents, less likely to work for young firms, and less likely to become entrepreneurs, and (ii) when an inventor is hired by an incumbent, compared to a young firm, their earnings increases by 12.6 percent and their innovative output declines by 6 to 11 percent. We also show that these patterns are robust and not driven by life cycle effects or occupational composition effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Ufuk Akcigit & Nathan Goldschlag, 2023. "Where Have All the "Creative Talents" Gone? Employment Dynamics of US Inventors," NBER Working Papers 31085, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:31085
    Note: EFG PR
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w31085.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde & Yang Yu & Francesco Zanetti, 2025. "Defensive Hiring and Creative Destruction," NBER Working Papers 33588, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Kox, Henk L.M., 2023. "Testing an extended knowledge-capital model of foreign direct investment," MPRA Paper 117266, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Joonkyu Choi & Serguey Braguinsky & Yuheng Ding & Karam Jo & Seula Kim, 2023. "Mega Firms and New Technological Trajectories in the U.S," NBER Working Papers 31460, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Akcigit, Ufuk & Chhina, Raman & Cilasun, Seyit Mümin & Miranda, Javier & Serrano-Velarde, Nicolas & Ocakverdi, Eren, 2023. "Intuit QuickBooks Small Business Index: A New Employment Series for the US, Canada, and the UK," CEPR Discussion Papers 18402, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Jo, Karam & Kim, Seula, 2024. "Heterogeneous Innovations and Growth Under Imperfect Technology Spillovers," IZA Discussion Papers 17581, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Karam Jo & Seula Kim, 2024. "Competition, Firm Innovation, and Growth under Imperfect Technology Spillovers," Working Papers 24-40, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    7. Bräuer, Richard, 2024. "Searching where Ideas Are Harder to Find – The Productivity Slowdown as a Result of Firms Hindering Disruptive Innovation," IWH Discussion Papers 22/2023, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), revised 2024.
    8. Tomaso Duso & Martin Peitz, 2025. "Aligning Competition Policy and Industrial Policy in the EU," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2145, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Ufuk Akcigit & Nathan Goldschlag, 2025. "Measuring the characteristics and employment dynamics of U.S. inventors," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 237-269, June.
    10. Timmermans, Oscar, 2024. "Cash versus share payouts in relative performance plans," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123696, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • O4 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:31085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.