The Value of Phased Retirement
This paper examines how phased retirement plans in higher education create value for both the institution and individual faculty, based upon evidence from the Survey of Changes in Faculty Retirement Policies and an in-depth case study of the University of North Carolina system. Faculty benefit by receiving improved opportunities for part-time work and by having the ability to make a smoother transition to retirement. The policy is clearly of great value to the 25 to 35 percent of UNC faculty who opt for phased over full retirement. The biggest payoff to the university is an increase in the odds that low-performing faculty will start the retirement process earlier. Universities also anticipate increased flexibility in managing faculty employment and compensation; phased retirement is most likely to be observed on campuses where a high percentage of faculty has tenure.
|Date of creation:||May 2004|
|Publication status:||published as Clark, Robert L. and Jennifer Ma. Recruitment, Retention and Retirement in Higher Education: Building and Managing the Faculty of the Future. Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, MA: Elgar, 2005.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.|
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Steven G. Allen & Robert L. Clark & Linda S. Ghent, 2003. "Phasing Into Retirement," NBER Working Papers 9779, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- John Pencavel, 2005.
"Faculty retirement incentives by colleges and universities,"
in: Recruitment, Retention and Retirement in Higher Education, chapter 10
Edward Elgar Publishing.
- John Pencavel, 2004. "Faculty Retirement Incentives by Colleges and Universities," Discussion Papers 03-028, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.