IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mtk/febawb/17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Key Issues In Developing The Public Administration System Of Estonia Before Joining The European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Janno Reiljan
  • Kadi Timpmann
  • Katrin Olenko

Abstract

Preparations to accede to the European Union (EU) have posed new challenges to the Estonian public administration system. In a country with a European social structure, the public administration system has to fulfil important tasks in promoting democracy, ensuring regionally balanced development and providing regular public services. Prior to accession to the EU, the aspect of regional development becomes especially important, as nearly 80% of the overall EU Budget will be targeted through the Common Agricultural Policy and Structural Funds towards rural and regional development of the Member States. One has to admit that today the administrative system of Estonia is not yet able to fulfil all the assignments that the EU requires from its Member States. Among other issues, the country’s weak administrative capacity has also been repeatedly pointed out by the European Commission. The main problem, however, does not lie in the non-compliance of the Estonian administrative system with the EU requirements, but in its ability to create favourable conditions for the development of the nation state. The increasing regional imbalances as well as the growing gap between the living standards of the rural and urban areas provide evidence that the Estonian central authorities are not able to fulfil their tasks sufficiently well. Local authorities often lack opportunities to effectively represent the interests of the local people. Estonia’s development logic does not correspond to the principles of the EU: in the EU the Member States, together with an increasing concern for the exclusive and balanced development inside the nation states, are also responsible for ensuring a closer integration between the Member States. Estonia would need to develop and strengthen its administrative system considerably, in order to be able to protect its national interests both before and after becoming an EU member. The aim of the present working paper is to analyse the key problems of the Estonian evolving administrative system, and suggest possible solutions. Most attention will be paid to determining the relationships between local governments and the central government. Firstly, the problems related to the evolution of the democratic administrative concepts in Estonia will be discussed. Secondly, the role of local governments in the society will be investigated. Subsequently the level of financing of local governments’ functions and its dynamic will be analysed and some recommendations will be made for assigning the proper financing schemes to the functions. Further we will study why it is necessary to accomplish the administrative reform in Estonia. Finally, the necessity and problems related to the widely debated administrative territorial reform will be elaborated on.

Suggested Citation

  • Janno Reiljan & Kadi Timpmann & Katrin Olenko, 2003. "Key Issues In Developing The Public Administration System Of Estonia Before Joining The European Union," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 17, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
  • Handle: RePEc:mtk:febawb:17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mtk.ut.ee/sites/default/files/mtk/RePEc/mtk/febpdf/febawb17.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilbert, Guy & Picard, Pierre, 1996. "Incentives and optimal size of local jurisdictions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 19-41, January.
    2. Mr. Vito Tanzi, 1997. "The Changing Role of the State in the Economy: A Historical Perspective," IMF Working Papers 1997/114, International Monetary Fund.
    3. Mr. M. Cangiano & Mr. Eric Mottu, 1998. "Will Fiscal Policy Be Effective Under EMU?," IMF Working Papers 1998/176, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben Lockwood, 2008. "Voting, Lobbying, And The Decentralization Theorem," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 416-431, November.
    2. Martin Besfamille, 2000. "Fiscal federalism, local public works and corruption," CREPP Working Papers 0001, Centre de Recherche en Economie Publique et de la Population (CREPP) (Research Center on Public and Population Economics) HEC-Management School, University of Liège.
    3. Helmuth Cremer & Pierre Pestieau, 1997. "Income Redistribution in an Economic Union: The Trade Off Between Inter- and Intra-National Redistribution," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 4(3), pages 325-335, July.
    4. David N King & Yue Ma, 2000. "Local Authority Provision versus Club Provision," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 18(2), pages 207-223, April.
    5. Laffont, Jean-Jacques & Pouyet, Jerome, 2004. "The subsidiarity bias in regulation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(1-2), pages 255-283, January.
    6. Huberto M. Ennis & Santiago M. Pinto & Alberto Porto, 2006. "Choosing a place to live and a workplace," Económica, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, vol. 0(1-2), pages 15-51, January-D.
    7. Davide Furceri, 2002. "Risk-sharing e architettura istituzionale delle politiche di stabilizzazione nell'UME: aspetti metodologici e verifica empirica," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 92(6), pages 175-210, November-.
    8. Derycke, Pierre-Henri, 2009. "Regards sur l’économie urbaine 40 ans de recherches francophones (1965-2007)," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Editions NecPlus, vol. 2009(02), pages 239-266, June.
    9. Lockwood, Ben, 2000. "The Assignment of Powers in Federal and Unitary States," Economic Research Papers 269340, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    10. François Bareille & Matteo Zavalloni, 2020. "Decentralisation of agri-environmental policy design," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(4), pages 1502-1530.
    11. Hindriks, Jean & Lockwood, Ben, 2009. "Decentralization and electoral accountability: Incentives, separation and voter welfare," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 385-397, September.
    12. Sören Blomquist & Luca Micheletto, 2009. "Nonlinear Income Taxation And Matching Grants In A Federation With Decentralized In-Kind Transfers," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 50(2), pages 543-575, May.
    13. Pula Lekë & Elshani Alban, 2018. "Role of Public Expenditure in Economic Growth: Econometric Evidence from Kosovo 2002–2015," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 74-87, June.
    14. Barankay, Iwan & Lockwood, Ben, 2007. "Decentralization and the productive efficiency of government: Evidence from Swiss cantons," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(5-6), pages 1197-1218, June.
    15. Buchmann, Gabriel & Neri, Marcelo Côrtes, 2008. "The brazilian education quality index (Ideb): measurement and incentives upgrades," FGV EPGE Economics Working Papers (Ensaios Economicos da EPGE) 686, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil).
    16. Cremer, Helmuth & Pestieau, Pierre, 1996. "Distributive implications of European integration," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-5), pages 747-757, April.
    17. Lopes-Carlos, Augusto, 2006. "Russia: competitiveness, growth, and the next stage of development," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 21-37, March.
    18. Cornes, Richard C. & Silva, Emilson C. D., 2002. "Local public goods, inter-regional transfers and private information," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 329-356, February.
    19. Karl Morasch, 2000. "Decentralization of Industrial Policy as Strategic Delegation," Discussion Paper Series 193, Universitaet Augsburg, Institute for Economics.
    20. Guy Gilbert & Yvon Rocaboy, 2004. "The central government grant allocation problem in the presence of misrepresentation and cheating," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 137-147, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mtk:febawb:17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anne Reino (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/febutee.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.