IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/46aa64dfeb5e4f84b5f7406b8a8a0a6f.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Designing Medicaid Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Demonstrations to Reward Better Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Heeringa
  • Debra Lipson
  • Rachel Machta
  • Keanan Lane
  • Rachel Vogt

Abstract

This brief describes differences in incentive design features of six DSRIP demonstrations and assesses their strengths and limitations in promoting provider participation in delivery system reform and value-based payment (VBP) arrangements.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Heeringa & Debra Lipson & Rachel Machta & Keanan Lane & Rachel Vogt, "undated". "Designing Medicaid Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Demonstrations to Reward Better Performance," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 46aa64dfeb5e4f84b5f7406b8, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:46aa64dfeb5e4f84b5f7406b8a8a0a6f
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/health/2018/1115-dsrip-incentive-design.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melanie Au & Carey Appold & Ryan Stringer & Patrick Balke, "undated". "Attribution in DSRIP Demonstration Programs: A Spotlight on New Jersey and New York," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 9c4ceba4a0d24e5b8a1877b59, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Frank Eijkenaar, 2013. "Key issues in the design of pay for performance programs," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(1), pages 117-131, February.
    3. Eijkenaar, Frank & Emmert, Martin & Scheppach, Manfred & Schöffski, Oliver, 2013. "Effects of pay for performance in health care: A systematic review of systematic reviews," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 115-130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herbst, T. & Foerster, J. & Emmert, M., 2018. "The impact of pay-for-performance on the quality of care in ophthalmology: Empirical evidence from Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(6), pages 667-673.
    2. Ammi, Mehdi & Fortier, Grant, 2017. "The influence of welfare systems on pay-for-performance programs for general practitioners: A critical review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 157-166.
    3. F. P. Vlaanderen & M. A. Tanke & B. R. Bloem & M. J. Faber & F. Eijkenaar & F. T. Schut & P. P. T. Jeurissen, 2019. "Design and effects of outcome-based payment models in healthcare: a systematic review," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(2), pages 217-232, March.
    4. Monica Giancotti & Giorgia Rotundo & Paolo Misericordia & Silvestro Scotti & Milena Lopreite & Marianna Mauro, 2018. "Preliminary investigation into general practitioners? willingness to accept the pay-for-performance scheme: A replication study," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(106), pages 65-92.
    5. R. Tamara Konetzka & Meghan M. Skira & Rachel M. Werner, 2018. "Incentive Design and Quality Improvements: Evidence from State Medicaid Nursing Home Pay-for-Performance Programs," American Journal of Health Economics, MIT Press, vol. 4(1), pages 105-130, Winter.
    6. Lina Maria Ellegård & Jens Dietrichson & Anders Anell, 2018. "Can pay‐for‐performance to primary care providers stimulate appropriate use of antibiotics?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 39-54, January.
    7. Baxter, Pamela E. & Hewko, Sarah J. & Pfaff, Kathryn A. & Cleghorn, Laura & Cunningham, Barbara J. & Elston, Dawn & Cummings, Greta G., 2015. "Leaders’ experiences and perceptions implementing activity-based funding and pay-for-performance hospital funding models: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(8), pages 1096-1110.
    8. Domenico Lisi & Luigi Siciliani & Odd Rune Straume, 2020. "Hospital competition under pay‐for‐performance: Quality, mortality, and readmissions," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 289-314, April.
    9. Krauth, Christian & Liersch, Sebastian & Jensen, Sören & Amelung, Volker Eric, 2016. "Would German physicians opt for pay-for-performance programs? A willingness-to-accept experiment in a large general practitioners’ sample," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 148-158.
    10. Oxholm, Anne Sophie & Di Guida, Sibilla & Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte, 2021. "Allocation of health care under pay for performance: Winners and losers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    11. Panayotis Constantinou & Jonathan Sicsic & Carine Franc, 2017. "Effect of pay-for-performance on cervical cancer screening participation in France," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 181-201, June.
    12. Jui-fen Rachel Lu & Ying Isabel Chen & Karen Eggleston & Chih-Hung Chen & Brian Chen, 2023. "Assessing Taiwan’s pay-for-performance program for diabetes care: a cost–benefit net value approach," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(5), pages 717-733, July.
    13. Girault, Anne & Bellanger, Martine & Lalloué, Benoît & Loirat, Philippe & Moisdon, Jean-Claude & Minvielle, Etienne, 2017. "Implementing hospital pay-for-performance: Lessons learned from the French pilot program," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(4), pages 407-417.
    14. Laurie Felland & Debra Lipson & Jessica Heeringa, "undated". "Examining New York’s Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Demonstration: Achievements at the Demonstration’s Midpoint and Lessons for Other States," Mathematica Policy Research Reports aa63a17b8aef42bc8e45a90d8, Mathematica Policy Research.
    15. Kristensen, Søren Rud & Siciliani, Luigi & Sutton, Matt, 2016. "Optimal price-setting in pay for performance schemes in health care," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 57-77.
    16. Hinterhuber, Andreas, 2017. "Value quantification capabilities in industrial markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 163-178.
    17. Darius Erlangga & Marc Suhrcke & Shehzad Ali & Karen Bloor, 2019. "The impact of public health insurance on health care utilisation, financial protection and health status in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Nadja Kairies-Schwarz & Claudia Souček, 2020. "Performance Pay in Hospitals: An Experiment on Bonus–Malus Incentives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-29, November.
    19. Carmen Carpio & Natalia Santiago Bench, 2015. "The Health Workforce in Latin America and the Caribbean," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 22027, December.
    20. Epstein, D.S. & Barton, C. & Mazza, D. & Woode, M.E. & Mortimer, D., 2020. "Patient chosen gap payments in primary care: Predictions of patient acceptability, uptake and willingness to pay from a discrete choice experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    1115 demonstrations; Medicaid; implementation; evaluation; delivery system reform incentive payments ; DSRIP;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:46aa64dfeb5e4f84b5f7406b8a8a0a6f. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.