Reverse-Shooting versus Forward-Shooting over a Range of Dimensionalities
This paper investigates the properties of dynamic solutions that have been derived using the well-known reverse-shooting and forwardshooting algorithms. Given an arbitrary large-scale model about which we have limited information, how successful are the algorithms likely to be in solving this model? We address this question using a range of investment models, both linear and non-linear. By extending the investment models to allow for multi-dimensional specifications of the capital stock, we are able to examine the computational efficiency of the competing algorithms as the dimensionality of the capital stock is allowed to increase. Our approach provides insights into how the complexity of the solutions to a broad range of macroeconomic models increases with the dimensionality of the models.
|Date of creation:||2004|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +61 3 8344 5355
Fax: +61 3 8344 6899
Web page: http://www.economics.unimelb.edu.au
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Fumio Hayashi, 1981.
"Tobin's Marginal q and Average a : A Neoclassical Interpretation,"
457, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
- Hayashi, Fumio, 1982. "Tobin's Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical Interpretation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 213-24, January.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mlb:wpaper:921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Aminata Doumbia)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.