IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

- Profitability, Market Structure And Efficiency: An Application To The Spanish Industry

Listed author(s):
  • Mercedes Gumbau Albert


    (Universitat de València)

  • Joaquín Maudos Villarroya

    (Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas)

This paper tests the different hypotheses explaining profitability in the generic framework of hypotheses of collusion versus efficiency, presenting as its main contribution the use of a direct measurement of efficiency. This measurement is obtained by applying frontier techniques using the information provided by the Spanish Ministry of Industry and Energy¿s Survey of Business Strategies (Encuesta Sobre Estrategias Empresariales) for the period 1991-94 and for the 18 sectors of activity in which the sample was divided. The evidence obtained enables us, on the one hand, to clearly reject the hypothesis of collusion in Spanish industry, since in only one sector does concentration positively affect profitability, and furthermore, the results allow us to reject in most cases the pure hypothesis of efficiency, as although efficiency does contribute positively to explaining differences in profitability, the market share, which would capture the effect of market power, also affects it positively. Thus, in many cases the empirical results indicate some limited support for the modified efficient structure hypothesis. En este trabajo se realiza un contraste de las distintas hipótesis explicativas de la rentabilidad en el marco genérico de las hipótesis de colusión versus eficiencia, presentando como principal aportación la utilización de una medida directa de eficiencia. Dicha medida se obtiene mediante la aplicación de técnicas frontera utilizando la información proporcionada por la Encuesta Sobre Estrategias Empresariales para el periodo 1991-94 y para los 18 sectores de actividad en los que se ha dividido la muestra. La evidencia obtenida permite, por una parte, rechazar claramente la hipótesis de colusión en la industria española ya que en tan sólo un sector la concentración afecta positivamente a la rentabilidad y, por otra parte, los resultados permiten rechazar en la mayoría de los casos la hipótesis pura de eficiencia, ya que si bien la eficiencia contribuye de forma positiva a explicar las diferencias de rentabilidad, la cuota de mercado, que captataría el efecto del poder de mercado, también afecta de forma positiva. Así, en muchos casos la evidencia obtenida es parcialmente favorable a la denominada "hipótesis de estructura eficiente modificada".

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: Fisrt version / Primera version, 2000
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie) in its series Working Papers. Serie EC with number 2000-05.

in new window

Length: 32 pages
Date of creation: May 2000
Publication status: Published by Ivie
Handle: RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2000-05
Contact details of provider: Postal:
C/ Guardia Civil, 22, Esc 2a, 1o, E-46020 VALENCIA

Phone: +34 96 319 00 50
Fax: +34 96 319 00 55
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Cristina Mazón, 1993. "Is Profitability related to market Share? An Intra-Industry Study in Spanish Manufacturing," Working Papers 9327, Banco de España;Working Papers Homepage.
  2. Demsetz, Harold, 1973. "Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, April.
  3. Schmalensee, Richard, 1987. "Collusion versus Differential Efficiency: Testing Alternative Hypotheses," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 399-425, June.
  4. Joaquin Maudos, 1998. "Market structure and performance in Spanish banking using a direct measure of efficiency," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 191-200.
  5. Smirlock, Michael & Gilligan, Thomas & Marshall, William, 1984. "Tobin's q and the Structure-Performance Relationship," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(5), pages 1051-1060, December.
  6. SIMAR, Léopold, "undated". "Estimating efficiencies from frontier models with panel data: a comparison of parametric, non-parametric and semi-parametric metods with bootstrapping," CORE Discussion Papers RP 995, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  7. Esperanza Gracia, 1999. "Márgenes y cuotas de mercado. Un análisis con un micropanel," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 23(3), pages 393-428, September.
  8. Bauer, Paul W. & Hancock, Diana, 1993. "The efficiency of the Federal Reserve in providing check processing services," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(2-3), pages 287-311, April.
  9. Schmalensee, Richard, 1989. "Inter-industry studies of structure and performance," Handbook of Industrial Organization,in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 16, pages 951-1009 Elsevier.
  10. Goldberg, Lawrence G. & Rai, Anoop, 1996. "The structure-performance relationship for European banking," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 745-771, May.
  11. Smirlock, Michael & Gilligan, Thomas & Marshall, William, 1986. "Tobin's q and the Structure-Performance Relationship: Reply," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(5), pages 1211-1213, December.
  12. Aigner, Dennis & Lovell, C. A. Knox & Schmidt, Peter, 1977. "Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 21-37, July.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2000-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Departamento de Edición)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.