IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/198101010800007868.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Bolivian beef cattle industry: effects of transportation projects upon plant location and product flows in Beni

Author

Listed:
  • Ampuero-Ramos, Luis A.

Abstract

Bolivia has the potential to become an important beef exporting country in South America. However, to penetrate foreign markets (in Chile, Peru, and Brazil) she must upgrade her processing facilities. This calls for the construction of new slaughterhouses.;In the course of the 1980s, several new transport linkages (involving roads, railways, and waterways) are to be completed as Bolivians seek to integrate their territory. Most of these new linkages will connect the department of Beni, in the tropical lowland, with the rest of the country. It is in Beni where the greatest potential for cattle-beef production exists.;This study seeks to examine what will happen with the optimal location patterns of new slaughterhouses in Beni and factor-product flows as the new transportation connections are completed. The criterion of optimality selected in the analysis is the minimum combined costs of assembling and slaughtering cattle and distributing beef. Two beef qualities, four plant sizes, four levels of operation, and four export scenarios are considered. The analysis employs an iterative linear programming procedure.;It is found that the new transport projects have a negligible impact upon optimal patterns of plant locations, sizes and levels of operation and factor-product flows. This is so because: (a) For most routes, the new road and rail connections do not reduce transport costs of beef. As a consequence, air transportation continues to be the dominant mode for beef shipments; (b) there exist various institutional constraints, not considered in the mathematical model, which increase beef transport costs in relation to those of live cattle; and (c) given a slaughterhouse size and level of operation, all plant sites have identical processing costs.;The analysis indicates that alternative export scenarios have significant effects upon optimal locations, numbers, and sizes of slaughterhouses. This implies that plant location patterns should be formulated after foreign market opportunities have been carefully assessed.;Various factors were not considered in the analysis, such as other livestock types, taxes and levies, cattle by-products, and seasonal variations in the transportation infrastructure. The study permits one to focus on various areas in which existing information is weak. Several possible extensions of the analysis are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Ampuero-Ramos, Luis A., 1981. "The Bolivian beef cattle industry: effects of transportation projects upon plant location and product flows in Beni," ISU General Staff Papers 198101010800007868, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198101010800007868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/ff8d2713-cc11-48b3-b060-f43807b614c7/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alex Orden, 1956. "The Transhipment Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 276-285, April.
    2. Allan A. Warrack & Lehman B. Fletcher, 1970. "Plant-Location Model Suboptimization for Large Problems," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 52(4), pages 587-590.
    3. Duewer, Lawrence A. & Crawford, Terry L., 1977. "Alternative Retail Beef-Handling Systems," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 29(3), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Wen-Shyong Chern & Leo Polopolus, 1970. "Discontinuous Plant Cost Function and a Modification of the Stollsteimer Location Model," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 52(4), pages 581-586.
    5. Gerrity, Martin V. & Johnson, Harold D., 1956. "Motortruck Transportation of Freshly Killed Beef," Marketing Research Reports 310198, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    6. John F. Stollsteimer, 1963. "A Working Model for Plant Numbers and Locations," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 45(3), pages 631-645.
    7. Anonymous, 1960. "Food and Agriculture Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 460-462, July.
    8. Verner G. Hurt & Thomas E. Tramel, 1965. "Alternative Formulations of the Transhipment Problem," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 47(3), pages 763-773.
    9. Gordon A. King & Samuel H. Logan, 1964. "Optimum Location, Number and Size of Processing Plants with Raw Product and Final Product Shipments," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 46(1), pages 94-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M T Lucas & D Chhajed, 2004. "Applications of location analysis in agriculture: a survey," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(6), pages 561-578, June.
    2. Cassidy, P.A. & McCarthy, W.O. & Toft, H.I., 1970. "An Application Of Spatial Analysis To Beef Slaughter Plant Location And Size, Queensland," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Martin, Larry & Hedley, H.A., 1975. "An Analysis of Structural Change in the Ontario Feed Milling Sector," Working Papers 245020, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Fuller, Stephen W., 1975. "A Modification Of The Modified Stollsteimer Location Model," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(1), pages 1-6, July.
    5. Kingwell, Ross, 2017. "Changes in grain handling catchments in Australia: an historical perspective," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(3), July.
    6. Marten Graubner & Richard J. Sexton, 2023. "More competitive than you think? Pricing and location of processing firms in agricultural markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(3), pages 784-808, May.
    7. Brown, Colin G. & Drynan, Ross G., 1986. "Plant Location Analysis Using Discrete Stochastic Programming," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 30(1), pages 1-22, April.
    8. MacKay, D.R. & Toft, H.I., 1978. "An Application of Spatial Equilibrium Analysis to the Transport and Processing of Wholemilk in N.S.W," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(01), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Moseley, Anne E. & Spreen, Thomas H. & Pheasant, Jim W., 1986. "A Mixed-Integer Programming Analysis of the Structure of a Florida-Based Cattle Feeding Industry," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 125-138, December.
    10. Fuller, Stephen W. & Washburn, Monty, 1974. "Application Of A Plant Location Model To An Area'S Cotton Ginning Industry," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, July.
    11. Pratt, James E. & Bishop, Phillip M. & Erba, Eric M. & Novakovic, Andrew M. & Stephenson, Mark W., 1997. "A Description of the Methods and Data Employed in the U.S. Dairy Sector Simulator, Version 97.3," Research Bulletins 122723, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    12. Graubner, Marten & Sexton, Richard J., 2021. "Spatial competition in agricultural procurement markets," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313962, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Stennis, Earl A. & Hurt, Verner G., 1975. "A Negative-Cost Approach To The Formulation Of A Transhipment Problem," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(1), pages 1-6, July.
    14. Graubner, Marten & Sexton, Richard J., 2023. "More competitive than you think? Pricing and location of processing firms in agricultural markets," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 105(3), pages 784-808.
    15. Gianmarco I P Ottaviano & Jacques-François Thisse, 2005. "New Economic Geography: What about the N?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(10), pages 1707-1725, October.
    16. Lenne, J.M. & Wood, D., 2004. "Is there a 'logic of fodder legumes' in Africa?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 565-585, October.
    17. Holder, Shelby H. & Shaw, Dale L. & Snyder, James C., 1971. "A Systems Model of the U.S. Rice Industry," Technical Bulletins 171894, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Delzeit, Ruth & Britz, Wolfgang & Holm-Müller, Karin, 2011. "Modelling regional input markets with numerous processing plants: The case of green maize for biogas production in Germany," Discussion Papers 162892, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    19. Emerson M. Babb, 1986. "Production and operations management," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(4), pages 421-429.
    20. Unknown, 1964. "The World Food Budget: 1970," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 144071, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198101010800007868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.