IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genres/11284.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lessons from the Danish Ban on Feed-Grade Antibiotics

Author

Listed:
  • Hayes, Dermot J.
  • Jensen, Helen H.

Abstract

Recent experiences in Denmark provide some comparable evidence on the effects of a ban on antibiotics in feed for hog production. A ban in the United States would increase costs by nearly $4.50 per animal in the first year, and, as in Denmark, raise significant issues with respect to animal health, especially at the post-weaning stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayes, Dermot J. & Jensen, Helen H., 2003. "Lessons from the Danish Ban on Feed-Grade Antibiotics," Staff General Research Papers Archive 11284, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genres:11284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chad Hart & Wendong Zhang, 2016. "Crude Oil Prices and US Crop Exports: Exploring the Secondary Links between the Energy and Ag Markets," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-spring-2016-2, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Norwood Bailey & Lusk Jayson L, 2005. "Instrument-Induced Bias in Donation Mechanisms: Evidence from the Field," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Saitone, Tina L. & Sexton, Richard J. & Sumner, Daniel A., 2015. "What Happens When Food Marketers Require Restrictive Farming Practices?," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 5, September.
    4. William D. McBride & Nigel Key & Kenneth H. Mathews, 2008. "Subtherapeutic Antibiotics and Productivity in U.S. Hog Production," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 30(2), pages 270-288.
    5. Sandip Agarwal & Keri L. Jacobs & Quinn Weninger & John Sawyer, 2016. "The Yield Response to Nitrogen: Subjective Belief Bias in Nitrogen Management," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-spring-2016-1, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    6. Louis Anthony (Tony) Cox & Douglas A. Popken & Richard Carnevale, 2007. "Quantifying Human Health Risks from Animal Antimicrobials," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 22-38, February.
    7. Tina L. Saitone & Richard J. Sexton, 2017. "Agri-food supply chain: evolution and performance with conflicting consumer and societal demands," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 44(4), pages 634-657.
    8. Helen H. Jensen, 2016. "Reducing Antibiotic Use in Animal Production Systems," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-spring-2016-3, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    9. Wang, Yuhan & Qin, Zhiran & Sexton, Richard J., 2023. "Impacts of Subnational Regulation of Production Practices for Foods Consumed within the Jurisdiction: California’s Proposition 12," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335949, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Michael G. Hogberg & Kellie Curry Raper & James F. Oehmke, 2009. "Banning subtherapeutic antibiotics in U.S. swine production: a simulation of impacts on industry structure," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(3), pages 314-330.
    11. Louis Anthony (Tony) Cox, 2007. "Does Concern‐Driven Risk Management Provide a Viable Alternative to QRA?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 27-43, February.
    12. Catherine L. Kling & Raymond W. Arritt & Gray Calhoun & David A. Keiser, 2016. "Research Needs and Challenges in the Food, Energy and Water System: Findings from an NSF Funded Workshop," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-spring-2016-4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genres:11284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.