IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/laedte/202601.html

Job quality and the platformisation of regular work: A cross-country analysis of digital monitoring and algorithmic management in the EU

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Digitalisation and the increasing use of digital platforms for the coordination of work processes in an algorithmic way can have deep implications for the world of work. While digital monitoring and algorithmic management have been a paradigmatic feature of work in the gig economy, they are increasingly permeating the regular economy across sectors and occupations, a phenomenon that can be termed the 'platformisation' of regular work. Besides potential efficiency gains, these new data-driven managerial and control structures can have implications for workers' well-being. The AIM-WORK survey, conducted by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre in 2024-2025 in all EU Member States, is currently the most comprehensive representative survey on the issue. This paper uses this novel evidence to examine the implications of the platformisation of work for job quality across EU countries. Our findings show that some forms of platformisation are associated with reduced worker autonomy and work intensification. In contrast to intellectual jobs, platformised workers performing manual routine tasks are more commonly routinised and monitored. These negative associations are almost exclusively concentrated in Central-Eastern Member States, with Western EU countries generally showing neutral job quality outcomes. We argue that this stark contrast suggests that labour market institutions are key in preventing detrimental effects of platformisation of regular work on European labour markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariscal De Gante Martin Alvaro & Gonzalez Vazquez Ignacio & Fernandez Macias Enrique, 2026. "Job quality and the platformisation of regular work: A cross-country analysis of digital monitoring and algorithmic management in the EU," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2026-01, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:laedte:202601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC145550
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rafael Muñoz de Bustillo & Enrique Fernández-Macías & José-Ignacio Antón & Fernando Esteve, 2011. "Measuring More than Money," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14072, June.
    2. RANI Uma & PESOLE Annarosa & GONZALEZ VAZQUEZ Ignacio, 2024. "Algorithmic Management practices in regular workplaces: case studies in logistics and healthcare," JRC Research Reports JRC136063, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Diane E. Bailey, 2022. "Emerging Technologies at Work: Policy Ideas to Address Negative Consequences for Work, Workers, and Society," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(3), pages 527-551, May.
    4. Reich, Michael & Gordon, David M & Edwards, Richard C, 1973. "A Theory of Labor Market Segmentation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 359-365, May.
    5. Sara Baiocco & Enrique Fernández-Macías & Uma Rani & Annarosa Pesole, 2022. "The Algorithmic Management of Work and its Implications in Different Contexts," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2022-02, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathalie Greenan & Dario Guarascio & Jelena Reljic, 2025. "AI and the labour market: opening the black box," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 925-951, December.
    2. Jacopo Staccioli & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2025. "Will your boss be an algorithm? A patent-based analysis of artificial intelligence worker management technologies and labour exposure," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1003-1033, December.
    3. Giovanna Boccuzzo & Licia Maron, 2017. "Proposal of a composite indicator of job quality based on a measure of weighted distances," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 2357-2374, September.
    4. Ellis Scharfenaker, Markus P.A. Schneider, 2019. "Labor Market Segmentation and the Distribution of Income: New Evidence from Internal Census Bureau Data," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2019_08, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
    5. Zhen Li & Zai Liang, 2016. "Gender and job mobility among rural to urban temporary migrants in the Pearl River Delta in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(16), pages 3455-3471, December.
    6. Grande, Rafael & Muñoz de Bustillo, Rafael & Fernández Macías, Enrique & Antón, José Ignacio, 2020. "Innovation and job quality. A firm-level exploration," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 130-142.
    7. Etienne Wasmer & Nicolas Lepage-Saucier & Juliette Schleich, 2013. "Moving towards a single labour contract: pros, cons and mixed feelings," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03460980, HAL.
    8. Zoran Slavnic, 2011. "Struggle for Survival in the Deregulated Market: Re-commodification and Informalisation of the Taxi Sector in Stockholm," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 233-251, January.
    9. Alan Felstead & Duncan Gallie & Francis Green & Golo Henseke, 2019. "Conceiving, designing and trailing a short‐form measure of job quality: a proof‐of‐concept study," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 2-19, January.
    10. Sudha Narayanan & Digvijay S Negi & Tanu Gupta, 2023. "Separability, spillovers, and segmented markets : Evidence from dairy in India," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(6), pages 884-899, November.
    11. Harith Yas Khudhair & Ahmad Jusoh & Abbas Mardani & Khalil Md Nor & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "Review of Scoping Studies on Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty in the Airline Industry," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 13(4), December.
    12. Beckmann, Fabian, 2020. "Perceived Job Quality in German Minijobs. A Multidimensional Analysis of Work in Marginal Part-time Employment RelationshipsDate submitted: August 23, 2018Revised version accepted after double-blind review: February 11, 2019," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 31(2), pages 116-144.
    13. Tiller, Rachel Gjelsvik & Hansen, Lillian & Richards, Russell & Strand, Hillevi, 2015. "Work segmentation in the Norwegian salmon industry: The application of segmented labor market theory to work migrants on the island community of Frøya, Norway," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 563-572.
    14. Andrea Salvatori & Seetha Menon & Wouter Zwysen, 2018. "The effect of computer use on job quality: Evidence from Europe," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 200, OECD Publishing.
    15. Lukas Lehner & Paul Ramskogler & Aleksandra Riedl, 2024. "Beggaring Thy Co-Worker: Labor Market Dualization and the Wage Growth Slowdown in Europe," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(5), pages 659-684, October.
    16. Conte, Michael & Levy, David T. & Shahrokh, Fereidoon & Staveley, Jane & Thompson, Steven, 1998. "Economic Determinants of Income Maintenance Programs: The Maryland Forecasting Model," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 461-481, August.
    17. Christine Erhel & Mathilde Guergoat-Larivière & Janine Leschke & Andrew Watt, 2014. "Trends in Job Quality during the Great Recession: a Comparative Approach for the EU / Tendances de la qualité de l'emploi pendant la crise : une approche européenne comparative," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00966898, HAL.
    18. Ylenia Curci & Nathalie Greenan & Silvia Napolitano, 2024. "Innovating for the good or for the bad. An EU-wide analysis of the impact of technological transformation on job polarisation and unemployment," TEPP Working Paper 2024-02, TEPP.
    19. Ravi Srivastava, 2019. "Emerging Dynamics of Labour Market Inequality in India: Migration, Informality, Segmentation and Social Discrimination," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 62(2), pages 147-171, June.
    20. Lyu, Zhuoyang & Yu, Li & Liu, Chen & Ma, Tiemeng, 2024. "When temperatures matter: Extreme heat and labor share," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:laedte:202601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.