IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc146569.html

Societal wellbeing: US vs EU

Author

Listed:

Abstract

‣ GDP (or household income) alone is insufficient to measure wellbeing. Adopting new, distribution- and sustainability-sensitive welfare metrics, fully in line with the provisions of the EU Treaty, could help to shape more inclusive and balanced economic and social policies that also respect planetary boundaries. ‣ A broader look on societal wellbeing can modify the EU-US comparison substantially and yield very different conclusions on the relative performances over time. From 2010 2023, GDP per capita rose 25% in the United States (vs 17% in the EU). Yet the EU’s overall current wellbeing index increased by 9.5 percentage points while the US moved up by only 1.2 points. ‣ In terms of sustainable and inclusive wellbeing, the EU index improved by 4.0 percentage points in 2010-2023, while the US index declined by 0.5, highlighting the importance of factors like resources for the future, societal resilience, nature, inequalities, and institutional quality. ‣ The resources for the future index, however, is much higher in the US than in the EU, helped by the higher economic growth of the US. ‣ When GDP is adjusted for health and inequality, the EU comes out ahead: using an ‘equivalent income’ metric that incorporates life expectancy and income inequality, the EU surpassed the US by 2022

Suggested Citation

  • Benczur Peter & Cariboni Jessica & Da Costa Shaun Mark & Giovannini Enrico, 2026. "Societal wellbeing: US vs EU," JRC Research Reports JRC146569, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc146569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC146569
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc146569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.