IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iob/dpaper/2014001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Colombian coffee strategies and the livelihoods of smallholders

Author

Listed:
  • Niño Peña, Monica Patricia
  • Pelupessy, Wim

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to assess the effects that different competitiveness strategies based on commercial quality attributes may have on the livelihoods of small coffee growers in Colombia. Using a combination of global value chain and sustainable livelihood approaches, it appears that the impacts of traditionally applied material quality, symbolic and in-person services characteristics are quite different for the growers. The possibility of smallholders to benefit from quality attributes is greatly influenced by the global chain governance structure imposed by big multinational roasters in developed countries and the National Federation of Coffee Growers who acts as domestic lead firm and official external regulator in Colombia. The unequal power distribution in the chain has effects on growers’ income as they grasp direct benefits from the first transformations of coffee, but are far from the end product that consumers buy. Most of the value added during the coffee trans¬formation process accrues to the consuming country where branding, marketing and advertising are high-value generating activities. From the micro-level perspective it appears that endowments of key assets are not enough for growers to reach the poverty line through coffee production exclusively, while the socio-cultural assets of coffee growing are also threatened by disintegrating pressures from the nearby capital Bogotá. Further material and symbolic quality improvements may benefit the growers but are usually not enough to raise household income above the poverty line. A regional denomination of origin strategy may improve the local economic and cultural sustainability of coffee growing.

Suggested Citation

  • Niño Peña, Monica Patricia & Pelupessy, Wim, 2014. "Colombian coffee strategies and the livelihoods of smallholders," IOB Discussion Papers 2014.01, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).
  • Handle: RePEc:iob:dpaper:2014001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://medialibrary.uantwerpen.be/oldcontent/container2143/files/Publications/DP/2014/01-Nino-Pelupessy.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chambers, R. & Conway, G. R., 1991. "Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century," IWMI Books, Reports H032821, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Ellis, Frank, 2000. "Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198296966, Decembrie.
    3. Allison, Edward H. & Horemans, Benoit, 2006. "Putting the principles of the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach into fisheries development policy and practice," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 757-766, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Babigumira, Ronnie & Angelsen, Arild & Buis, Maarten & Bauch, Simone & Sunderland, Terry & Wunder, Sven, 2014. "Forest Clearing in Rural Livelihoods: Household-Level Global-Comparative Evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(S1), pages 67-79.
    2. H.M. Tuihedur Rahman & Gordon M. Hickey, 2020. "An Analytical Framework for Assessing Context-Specific Rural Livelihood Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Diane Kapgen & Laurence Roudart, 2023. "A Multidisciplinary Approach to Assess Smallholder Farmers' Adoption of New Technologies in Development Interventions," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(4), pages 974-995, August.
    4. Hatim Albasri & Jesmond Sammut, 2021. "A Comparison of Vulnerability Risks and Conservation Perceptions between Mariculture, Fishery and Ecotourism Livelihood Groups in a Multi-Use MPA in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Francesca Marchetta, 2011. "On the Move Livelihood Strategies in Northern Ghana," CERDI Working papers halshs-00591137, HAL.
    6. Sourisseau, J.M. & Bosc, P.M. & Fréguin-Gresh, S. & Bélières, J.F. & Bonnal, P. & Le Coq, J.F. & Anseeuw, W. & Dury, S., 2012. "Représenter la diversité des formes familiales de la production agricole. Approches théoriques et empiriques," Working Papers MoISA 201205, UMR MoISA : Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems (social and nutritional sciences): CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRAE, L'Institut Agro, Montpellier SupAgro, IRD - Montpellier, France.
    7. Tanya Jakimow, 2013. "Unlocking the Black Box of Institutions in Livelihoods Analysis: Case Study from Andhra Pradesh, India," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 493-516, December.
    8. Lun Yang & Moucheng Liu & Qingwen Min, 2019. "Natural Disasters, Public Policies, Family Characteristics, or Livelihood Assets? The Driving Factors of Farmers’ Livelihood Strategy Choices in a Nature Reserve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Aye Chan Ko Ko & Zhang Ying & Theint Theint Htun, 2017. "Study on Socioeconomic Impacts of Private Forest Plantations on Local Livelihood in Pyu Township, Taungoo District, Bago Region, Myanmar," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 6(02), pages 43-54, February.
    10. Fanglei Zhong & Caoji Ying & Di Fan, 2022. "Public Service Delivery and the Livelihood Adaptive Capacity of Farmers and Herders: The Mediating Effect of Livelihood Capital," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Pierre Gasselin & Michel Vaillant & Benjamin Bathfield, 2012. "The activity system. A position paper," Post-Print hal-00742998, HAL.
    12. Ansoms, An & McKay, Andrew, 2010. "A quantitative analysis of poverty and livelihood profiles: The case of rural Rwanda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 584-598, December.
    13. Md. Rashed-Un-Nabi & Md. Azharul Hoque & Ridzwan Abdul Rahman & Saleem Mustafa & Md. Abdul Kader, 2011. "Poverty Profiling of the Estuarine Set Bag Net Fishermen Community in Bangladesh," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(2), pages 2-20, October.
    14. Shoba Arun & Samuel Kobina Annim & Thankom Arun, 2013. "Overcoming Household Shocks: Do Asset-Accumulation Strategies Matter?," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 281-305, September.
    15. Fekadu Mengistu & Engdawork Assefa, 2020. "Enhancing livelihood assets of households through watershed management intervention program: case of upper Gibe basin, Southwest Ethiopia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7515-7546, December.
    16. Mohammad Mahmudul Islam & Rumana Aktar & Md. Nahiduzzaman & Benoy Kumar Barman & Md. Abdul Wahab, 2018. "Social Considerations of Large River Sanctuaries: A Case Study from the Hilsa Shad Fishery in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Sarah Turner, 2009. "Hanoi's Ancient Quarter Traders: Resilient Livelihoods in a Rapidly Transforming City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(5-6), pages 1203-1221, May.
    18. Daniel Sumner & Maria Elisa Christie & Stéphane Boulakia, 2017. "Conservation agriculture and gendered livelihoods in Northwestern Cambodia: decision-making, space and access," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(2), pages 347-362, June.
    19. Bingzhen Du & Lin Zhen & Huimin Yan & Rudolf De Groot, 2016. "Effects of Government Grassland Conservation Policy on Household Livelihoods and Dependence on Local Grasslands: Evidence from Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Dinh, T.P. & Cameron, D. & Nguyen, X.T., 2015. "Rural livelihood adoption framework: A conceptual and analytical framework for studying adoption of new activities by small farmers," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 4(4), July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Colombia; coffee; livelihoods;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iob:dpaper:2014001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hans De Backer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iobuabe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.