Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe: Analyzing Business in Transnational Contexts
Ever since the European Commission (EC) defined what “corporate social responsibility” is, European debate has taken up the definition as given. However a brief review of literature soon highlights that the adopted definition has given rise to some relevant concerns and is not without its critics. These criticisms might relate to the fact that literature on the issue is mainly produced by American scholars, and does not completely match European needs. Following this hypothesis, one can argue that the “new” EC definition is, in fact, an old one. However, the point which seems to have been missed revolves around certain contextual differences, it is this point which this paper aims to shed light on. The aim of this contribution is to suggest the right tools with which to take diversities into account, in order to reach a definition that allows thought on corporate social responsibility to be a dynamic concept. How can we consider CSR in different contexts? Do we need to define it differently in relation to each context or does it have a general (common) meaning? The model here presented is based on two standard economic variables (size and sector) on the corporate side, and on three variables (socio-cultural, economic structure, and institutional) on the country-specific side. The result of the matrix gives a new way to define CSR in different contexts and suggests that location is the important issue, neglected both in the EC’s and in the scholars’ approaches. Key words: corporate social responsibility, stakeholder approach, European Commission, CSR modeling
|Date of creation:||Dec 2004|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Via Ravasi 2-21100 Varese|
Web page: http://www.uninsubria.it/uninsubria/facolta/econo.html
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Daniel Kahneman, 2003. "A Psychological Perspective on Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(2), pages 162-168, May.
- Secchi Davide, 2004. "The Italian Experience in Social Reporting," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf04016, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
- Freeman, R. Edward & Liedtka, Jeanne, 1991. "Corporate social responsibility: A critical approach," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 92-98.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ins:quaeco:qf04023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Segreteria Dipartimento)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.