IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v13y2006i3p135-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Italian experience in social reporting: an empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Secchi

Abstract

This analysis tries to discover an empirical validation to back up the hypothesis that the Italian phenomenon of social reporting has changed with regard to the past and is growing in importance. After considering the evolution of Italian literature on the issue, the paper tries to find connections between this literature and social reporting practices. Empirical findings are based on 62 Italian social reports. The paper tries to answer three questions: (a) what kind of organization publishes social reports; (b) what are the main differences, if any, between different reports belonging to diverse organizations; (c) which are the leading models. Social reports have been sorted according to three main issues: report objectives, emerging models and stakeholder mapping. Collected data suggest that there is a common ground for organizations in socially responsible behaviour, but also that this common ground fits the need of every single organization. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Secchi, 2006. "The Italian experience in social reporting: an empirical analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 135-149, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:13:y:2006:i:3:p:135-149
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.96
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.96?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Constantina Bichta, 2003. "Corporate socially responsible (CSR) practices in the context of Greek industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 12-24, March.
    2. Bowie, Norman, 1991. "New directions in corporate social responsibility," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 56-65.
    3. Ataur Rahman Belal, 2002. "Stakeholder accountability or stakeholder management: a review of UK firms' social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting (SEAAR) practices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 8-25, March.
    4. Freeman, R. Edward & Liedtka, Jeanne, 1991. "Corporate social responsibility: A critical approach," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 92-98.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Secchi Davide, 2004. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe: Analyzing Business in Transnational Contexts," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf04023, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
    2. Davide Secchi & Hong T. M. Bui, 2018. "Group Effects on Individual Attitudes Toward Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 725-746, May.
    3. Abeysuriya, Kumudini & Mitchell, Cynthia & White, Stuart, 2007. "Can corporate social responsibility resolve the sanitation question in developing Asian countries?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 174-183, April.
    4. Marcelo Royo-Vela & Jonathan Cuevas Lizama, 2022. "Creating Shared Value: Exploration in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Jill Brown & William Forster, 2013. "CSR and Stakeholder Theory: A Tale of Adam Smith," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 301-312, January.
    6. André, Kévin, 2013. "Why Should Business Education Care About Care? Toward an Educare Perspective," ESSEC Working Papers WP1315, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    7. Heidi Reed, 2024. "“When money is more valuable than people…”: The pandemic as a call for business to care," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 435-455, March.
    8. Layla Branicki & Senia Kalfa & Alison Pullen & Stephen Brammer, 2023. "Corporate Responses to Intimate Partner Violence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(4), pages 657-677, November.
    9. Hamad Alhumoudi, 2017. "External Social Accounting Developments: Analysis and Discussion of Academic Critiques," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(1), pages 33-45, June.
    10. Abul Kalam Azad, 2014. "How to Spot Business Ethics?," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 3(8), pages 544-547.
    11. Tobias Hahn & Mandy Scheermesser, 2006. "Approaches to corporate sustainability among German companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 150-165, July.
    12. Zainab Al Mubarak & Anji Ben Hamed & Muneer Al Mubarak, 2018. "Impact of corporate social responsibility on bank’s corporate image," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(5), pages 710-722, November.
    13. Mariëtte van Huijstee & Pieter Glasbergen, 2008. "The practice of stakeholder dialogue between multinationals and NGOs," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 298-310, September.
    14. Shin, Jiyoung & Moon, Jon Jungbien & Kang, Jingoo, 2023. "Where does ESG pay? The role of national culture in moderating the relationship between ESG performance and financial performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3).
    15. Drago, Carlo & Fortuna, Fabio, 2023. "Investigating the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Relationship: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Keyword-Ensemble Community Detection," FEEM Working Papers 336985, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    16. Nikolina Markota Vukic & Mislav Ante Omazic & Ana Aleksic, 2018. "Exploring the Link between Corporate Stakeholder Orientation and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 16(2), pages 275-288.
    17. Caroline D. Ditlev‐Simonsen & Atle Midttun, 2011. "What motivates managers to pursue corporate responsibility? a survey among key stakeholders," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 25-38, January.
    18. Mohamed Basta & James Lapalme & Marc Paquet & Patrick Saint‐Louis & Tarek Abu Zwaida, 2018. "How are supply chains addressing their social responsibility dilemmas? Review of the last decade and a half," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 833-843, September.
    19. Robert Kolodinsky & Timothy Madden & Daniel Zisk & Eric Henkel, 2010. "Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 167-181, January.
    20. Jose‐Manuel Prado‐Lorenzo & Isabel Gallego‐Alvarez & Isabel M. Garcia‐Sanchez, 2009. "Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: the ownership structure effect," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 94-107, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:13:y:2006:i:3:p:135-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.