IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ies/wpaper/e201605.html

Portfolio analysis with DEA: prior to choosing a model

Author

Listed:
  • Albane Tarnaud

    (IESEG School of Management)

  • Hervé Leleu

    (CNRS-LEM 9221 and IESEG School of Management)

Abstract

This paper examines the definition of a technology and the choice of a model orientation prior to the analysis of portfolios of financial assets with Data Envelopment Analysis. We acknowledge the previous contributions in the field and provide answers to the questions raised in Cook, Tone & Zhu (2014). These answers allow to determine the purpose of the study and to define the underlying ‘financial’ technology through the identification of the decision-making units and the selection of input and output variables in a multi-moment framework. We also show their impact on the traditional set of axioms that further characterizes the technology and propose some adjustments to the traditional models. We provide illustrations to show the effects of such changes on the scores of technical efficiency and ranking of the portfolios.

Suggested Citation

  • Albane Tarnaud & Hervé Leleu, 2016. "Portfolio analysis with DEA: prior to choosing a model," Working Papers 2016-EQM-05, IESEG School of Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ies:wpaper:e201605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ieseg.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/2016-EQM-05_Tarnaud.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Yong-Jun & Yang, Guo-Sen & Zhang, Wei-Guo, 2024. "A novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency approach for energy stock portfolio optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Xiao Shi & Zhuo Pei & Xinle Liu, 2025. "Efficiency Assessment of Mutual Fund With Risk and Negative Data: An Improved Two‐Stage Network SBM Model," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(3), pages 1645-1660, April.
    3. Ioannis E. Tsolas, 2020. "Precious Metal Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation: A Series Two-Stage DEA Modeling Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Ioannis E. Tsolas, 2020. "The Determinants of the Performance of Precious Metal Mutual Funds," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-10, November.
    5. Adam, Lukáš & Branda, Martin, 2021. "Risk-aversion in data envelopment analysis models with diversification," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Xiao, Helu & Zhou, Zhongbao & Ren, Teng & Liu, Wenbin, 2022. "Estimation of portfolio efficiency in nonconvex settings: A free disposal hull estimator with non-increasing returns to scale," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Valadkhani, Abbas & Moradi-Motlagh, Amir, 2023. "An empirical analysis of exchange-traded funds in the US," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 995-1009.
    8. Catarina Alexandra Neves Proença & Maria Elisabete Duarte Neves & Maria Castelo Baptista Gouveia & Mara Teresa Silva Madaleno, 2023. "Technological, healthcare and consumer funds efficiency: influence of COVID-19," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1-42, June.
    9. Zeng, Ximei & Zhou, Zhongbao & Gong, Yeming & Liu, Wenbin, 2022. "A data envelopment analysis model integrated with portfolio theory for energy mix adjustment: Evidence in the power industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Xiao, Helu & Ren, Tiantian & Zhou, Zhongbao & Liu, Wenbin, 2021. "Parameter uncertainty in estimation of portfolio efficiency: Evidence from an interval diversification-consistent DEA approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Naeem Mohseny-Tonekabony & Seyed Jafar Sadjadi & Emran Mohammadi & Mehrdad Tamiz & Dylan F. Jones, 2025. "Robust, extended goal programming with uncertainty sets: an application to a multi-objective portfolio selection problem leveraging DEA," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(2), pages 1497-1552, March.
    12. MCarmen Martínez‐Victoria & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2024. "Risk and return efficiency of manufacturing firms: Integrating corporate social responsibility performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3735-3744, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ies:wpaper:e201605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lies BOUTEN (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iesegfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.