IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hit/hiasdp/hias-e-157.html

The Effects of Place-based Startup Policy Mix on Local Entrepreneurship : Evidence from City Government Survey in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • OKAMURO, Hiroyuki
  • NISHIMURA, Junichi

Abstract

Place-based economic policies have attracted research attention. Previous studies have discussed the advantages of local governments due to the heterogeneity of local conditions and environment. In recent years, most Japanese cities have provided various types of startup support for various types of potential founders and startups for regional revitalization. However, no empirical studies have addressed local startup support by considering and comparing different types of startup support. Based on our original survey data of Japanese cities, we fill these gaps by estimating the effects of city-level startup support on local startup activities by comparing different support measures. Using a city-level panel dataset with seven periods over 20 years and panel fixed effect models, we find that both hard support (subsidies) and soft support (seminars) have positive and significant effects on the number of new establishments, whereas subsidies reduce the average size of new firms, suggesting a trade-off between policy goals.

Suggested Citation

  • OKAMURO, Hiroyuki & NISHIMURA, Junichi, 2026. "The Effects of Place-based Startup Policy Mix on Local Entrepreneurship : Evidence from City Government Survey in Japan," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-157, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.
    • Handle: RePEc:hit:hiasdp:hias-e-157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hit-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2061947/files/070_hiasDP-E-157.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hiroyuki Okamuro & Junichi Nishimura, 2021. "Effects of multilevel policy mix of public R&D subsidies: Empirical evidence from Japanese local SMEs [The Impact of R&D Subsidies on R&D Employment Composition]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(6), pages 829-840.
    2. Erik Stam, 2015. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1759-1769, September.
    3. David Audretsch & Max Keilbach, 2004. "Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic Performance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 949-959.
    4. Colombo, Massimo G. & Grilli, Luca, 2005. "Founders' human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 795-816, August.
    5. Wei, Yifan, 2022. "Regional governments and opportunity entrepreneurship in underdeveloped institutional environments: An entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    6. Santarelli, Enrico & Piergiovanni, Roberta, 1995. "The Determinants of Firm Start-up and Entry in Italian Producer Services," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 221-230, June.
    7. Hiroyuki Okamuro & Junichi Nishimura, 2015. "Local Management of National Cluster Policies: Comparative Case Studies of Japanese, German, and French Biotechnology Clusters," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-27, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raquel Ortega-Argilés, 2022. "The evolution of regional entrepreneurship policies: “no one size fits all”," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(3), pages 585-610, December.
    2. Syed Tariq Anwar, 2025. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems, evolutionary growth and global expansion," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 528-558, June.
    3. Erik Lundmark & Anna Krzeminska & Dean A. Shepherd, 2019. "Images of Entrepreneurship: Exploring Root Metaphors and Expanding Upon Them," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 138-170, January.
    4. Ugo Rizzo & Francesco Nicolli & Laura Ramaciotti, 2014. "The Heterogeneity of the Development Process of New Technology-Based Firms. Implication for Innovation Policies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(1), pages 114-132, March.
    5. Xionghe Qin & Shiping Qin & Yi She, 2025. "High-tech entrepreneurship in regional innovativeness: the role of government innovation intervention," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 2493-2515, December.
    6. Mirella Schrijvers & Niels Bosma & Erik Stam, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Structural Change in European Regions," Working Papers 2202, Utrecht School of Economics.
    7. Kyle Scott, 2025. "The Need for Virtue in Entrepreneurship Ecosystems: Mitigating the Destructive Side of Entrepreneurship," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 319-343, August.
    8. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    9. Jolanda Hessels & Peter van der Zwan & Mark Sanders, 2013. "Entrepreneurial activity, industry orientation, and economic growth," Scales Research Reports H201307, EIM Business and Policy Research.
    10. Nikolaus Seitz & Martina Buratti & Erik E. Lehmann & Julie Kurrle, 2026. "A meta-analysis towards the effectiveness of startup accelerators," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 373-413, February.
    11. Marquardt, Leon & Harima, Aki, 2024. "Digital boundary spanning in the evolution of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Kantis, Hugo D. & Federico, Juan S. & García, Sabrina Ibarra, 2020. "Entrepreneurship policy and systemic conditions: Evidence-based implications and recommendations for emerging countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Edgar Nave & Pedro Torres & Ana Rita Querido & João J. Ferreira & Gabriela Fernandes, 2025. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems governance: critical perspectives and steps forward," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 2135-2230, October.
    14. Stephens, Simon & McLaughlin, Christopher & Ryan, Leah & Catena, Manuel & Bonner, Aisling, 2022. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Multiple domains, dimensions and relationships," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    15. Burström, Thommie & Lahti, Tom & Parida, Vinit & Wincent, Joakim, 2024. "Industrial ecosystems: A systematic review, framework and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    16. Belso-Martinez, Jose A. & Molina-Morales, F. Xavier & Mas-Verdu, Francisco, 2013. "Combining effects of internal resources, entrepreneur characteristics and KIS on new firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2079-2089.
    17. Feldman, Maryann & Fleming, Lee & Heaton, Sohvi & Desai, Sameeksha & Teece, David, 2022. "Uncommon methods and metrics for local entrepreneurial ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    18. Laborda Castillo Leopoldo & Guasch Jose Luis & Sotelsek Salem Daniel, 2011. "Entrepreneurship Capital and Technical Efficiency: The Role of New Business/Firms as a Conduit of Knowledge Spillovers," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 1(4), pages 1-24, October.
    19. F.C. Stam, 2018. "Enabling Creative Destruction: An Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Approach to Industrial Policy," Working Papers 18-05, Utrecht School of Economics.
    20. Christian Fisch & Michael Wyrwich & Thi Lanh Nguyen & Joern H. Block, 2020. "Historical institutional differences and entrepreneurship: the case of socialist legacy in Vietnam," Jena Economics Research Papers 2020-002, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H71 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hit:hiasdp:hias-e-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Digital Resources Section, Hitotsubashi University Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ashitjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.