IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/73sti2017.html

Roadmaps as a Tool for Modeling Complex Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Lyubov Y. Matich

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

Today roadmaps are becoming commonly used tool for detecting and designing a desired future for companies, states and the international community. The growing popularity of this method puts tasks such as identifying basic roadmapping principles, creation of concepts and determination of the characteristics of the use of roadmaps depending on the objectives as well as restrictions and opportunities specific to the study area on the agenda. However the system approach, e.g. the elements which are recognized to be major for high-quality roadmapping, remain one of the main fields for improving the methodology and practice of their development as limited research was devoted to the detailed analysis of the roadmaps from the view of system approach. System analysis can make the process of roadmap development easier because it identifies six key stages, the implementation of which is necessary for the construction of any roadmap. Two case studies undertaken in the paper demonstrate the implementation of system approach for roadmap creation in the Russian companies and industries

Suggested Citation

  • Lyubov Y. Matich, 2017. "Roadmaps as a Tool for Modeling Complex Systems," HSE Working papers WP BRP 73/STI/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:73sti2017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wp.hse.ru/data/2017/03/09/1169505428/73STI2017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald N. Kostoff, 2001. "The metrics of science and technology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 50(2), pages 353-361, February.
    2. Peat, Maurice & Svec, Jiri & Wang, Jue, 2014. "Reporting bias in incomplete information model," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 45-49.
    3. Martin, Hilary & Daim, Tugrul U., 2012. "Technology roadmap development process (TRDP) for the service sector: A conceptual framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 94-105.
    4. Hai Lu & Jiaquan Yang & Kari Alanne, 2018. "Energy Quality Management for a Micro Energy Network Integrated with Renewables in a Tourist Area: A Chinese Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, April.
    5. Vishnevskiy, Konstantin & Karasev, Oleg & Meissner, Dirk, 2016. "Integrated roadmaps for strategic management and planning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 153-166.
    6. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2014-066 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daim, Tugrul U. & Yoon, Byung-Sung & Lindenberg, John & Grizzi, Robert & Estep, Judith & Oliver, Terry, 2018. "Strategic roadmapping of robotics technologies for the power industry: A multicriteria technology assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 49-66.
    2. Spaniol, Matthew J. & Rowland, Nicholas J., 2022. "Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. de Alcantara, Douglas Pedro & Martens, Mauro Luiz, 2019. "Technology Roadmapping (TRM): a systematic review of the literature focusing on models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 127-138.
    4. Douadia Bougherara & Laurent Piet, 2018. "On the role of probability weighting on WTP for crop insurance with and without yield skewness," Working Papers hal-02790605, HAL.
    5. Iñaki Bildosola & Pilar Gonzalez & Paz Moral, 2017. "An approach for modelling and forecasting research activity related to an emerging technology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 557-572, July.
    6. Beata Zatwarnicka-Madura & Dariusz Siemieniako & Ewa Glińska & Yauheniya Sazonenka, 2019. "Strategic and Operational Levels of CSR Marketing Communication for Sustainable Orientation of a Company: A Case Study from Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Cho, Yonghee & Yoon, Seong-Pil & Kim, Karp-Soo, 2016. "An industrial technology roadmap for supporting public R&D planning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-12.
    8. Yu, Xiang & Zhang, Ben, 2019. "Obtaining advantages from technology revolution: A patent roadmap for competition analysis and strategy planning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 273-283.
    9. Ghoroghi, Ali & Petri, Ioan & Rezgui, Yacine & Alzahrani, Ateyah, 2023. "A deep learning approach to predict and optimise energy in fish processing industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    10. Esmaelian, Majid & Tavana, Madjid & Di Caprio, Debora & Ansari, Reza, 2017. "A multiple correspondence analysis model for evaluating technology foresight methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 188-205.
    11. Nathasit Gerdsri & Boonkiart Iewwongcharoen & Kittichai Rajchamaha & Nisit Manotungvorapun & Jakapong Pongthanaisawan & Watcharin Witthayaweerasak, 2021. "Capability Assessment toward Sustainable Development of Business Incubators: Framework and Experience Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Marek Jemala & Ľubomír Jemala, 2014. "Key Sub-Disciplines and Methods of Technology Planning in Dynamic Environments," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(2), pages 71-84.
    13. Landry, Sylvain & Beaulieu, Martin & Roy, Jacques, 2016. "Strategy deployment in healthcare services: A case study approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 429-437.
    14. Wang, Xiaoli & Daim, Tugrul & Huang, Lucheng & Li, Zhiqiang & Shaikh, Ruqia & Kassi, Diby Francois, 2022. "Monitoring the development trend and competition status of high technologies using patent analysis and bibliographic coupling: The case of electronic design automation technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Mikhail Kozhevnikov & Lazar Gitelman & Elena Magaril & Romen Magaril & Alexandra Aristova, 2017. "Risk Reduction Methods for Managing the Development of Regional Electric Power Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Isabela Neto Piccirillo & Daniel Capaldo Amaral & Maicon Gouvêa De Oliveira, 2022. "A Research Agenda for Collaborative Roadmapping Supported by Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Sinfield, J.V. & Ajmani, A. & McShane, W., 2024. "Strategic roadmapping to accelerate and risk-mitigate enabling innovations: A generalizable method and a case illustration for marine renewable energy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    18. Unutmaz Durmuşoğlu, Zeynep Didem, 2018. "Assessment of techno-entrepreneurship projects by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-46.
    19. Christof Gellweiler, 2020. "Connecting Enterprise Architecture and Project Portfolio Management: A Review and a Model for IT Project Alignment," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 99-114, January.
    20. Ivan Lorencin & Nikola Anđelić & Vedran Mrzljak & Zlatan Car, 2019. "Genetic Algorithm Approach to Design of Multi-Layer Perceptron for Combined Cycle Power Plant Electrical Power Output Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-26, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:73sti2017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.