IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/17hum2013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The fate of social sciences in Soviet Russia: the case of Isaak Il’ich Rubin

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan Boldyrev

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow/Humboldt University, Berlin.)

  • Martin Kragh

    (Stockholm School of Economics/Uppsala Centre for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Uppsala University)

Abstract

Research within the history of economic thought has focused only little on the development of economics under dictatorship. This paper attempts to show how a country with a relatively large and internationally established community of social scientists in the 1920s, the Soviet Union, was subjected to repression. We tell this story through the case of Isaak Il’ich Rubin, a prominent Russian economist and historian of economic thought, who in the late 1920s was denounced by rival scholars and repressed by the political system. By focusing not only on his life and work, but also that of his opponents and institutional clashes, we show how the decline of a social science tradition in Russia and the USSR emerged as a process over time. We analyze the complex interplay of ideas, scholars and their institutional context, and conclude that subsequent repression was arbitrary, suggesting that no clear survival or career strategy existed in the Stalinist system due to a situation of fundamental uncertainty. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how the Stalinization of Soviet social sciences occurred as a process over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan Boldyrev & Martin Kragh, 2013. "The fate of social sciences in Soviet Russia: the case of Isaak Il’ich Rubin," HSE Working papers WP BRP 17/HUM/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:17hum2013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2013/03/20/1292396426/17HUM2013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Alexeev & Clifford Gaddy & Jim Leitzel, 1992. "Economics in the Former Soviet Union," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(2), pages 137-148, Spring.
    2. William Oliver Coleman, 2002. "Economics and Its Enemies," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-4039-1435-4.
    3. Barnett, Vincent, 2006. "Further Thoughts on Clarifying the Idea of Dissent: The Russian and Soviet Experience," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 111-118, March.
    4. Gilbert Faccarello, 1983. "La loi de la valeur et le problème de la coordination des activités économiques," Post-Print halshs-00743024, HAL.
    5. Vincent Barnett, 1995. "A long wave goodbye: Kondrat'ev and the Conjuncture institute, 1920–28," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 413-441.
    6. Leonard,Robert, 2010. "Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the Creation of Game Theory," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521562669.
    7. Harald Hagemann, 2011. "European émigrés and the ‘Americanization’ of economics," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 643-671, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vianna Franco, Marco P. & Ribeiro, Leonardo Costa & Albuquerque, Eduardo da Motta e, 2022. "Beyond Random Causes: Harmonic Analysis Of Business Cycles At The Moscow Conjuncture Institute," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 456-476, September.
    2. Muravyev, Alexander, 2011. "О Российской Экономической Науке Сквозь Призму Публикаций Российских Ученых В Отечественных И Зарубежных Журналах За 2000-2009 Гг [Economic science in Russia through the lens of publications of Rus," MPRA Paper 30230, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Aurélien Goutsmedt & Matthieu Renault & Francesco Sergi, 2021. "European Economics and the Early Years of the International Seminar on Macroeconomics," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 131(4), pages 693-722.
    4. Hanappi, Gerhard, 2019. "From Integrated Capitalism to Disintegrating Capitalism. Scenarios of a Third World War," MPRA Paper 91397, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Marek Hudik, 0. "Equilibrium as compatibility of plans," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    6. Ganiev, Ibragim & Djanibekov, Nodir & Hasanov, Shavkat & Petrick, Martin, 2017. "The state of doctoral research in Uzbekistan: Results of a survey of doctoral students in agricultural economics," IAMO Discussion Papers 259805, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    7. Giocoli, Nicola, 2011. "From Wald to Savage: homo economicus becomes a Bayesian statistician," MPRA Paper 34117, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Gul, Ejaz & Chaudhry, Imran Sharif & Faridi, Muhammad Zahir, 2014. "The Classical-Keynesian Paradigm: Policy Debate in Contemporary Era," MPRA Paper 53920, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Kyui, Natalia & Radchenko, Natalia, 2020. "The Changing Composition of Academic Majors and Wage Dynamics," IZA Discussion Papers 13591, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Akhabbar, Amanar, 2014. "Circulation du capital et explication du changement économique chez Marschak, Frisch et Leontief [Capital Circulation and the Explanation of Economic Change by Marschak, Frisch and Leontief]," MPRA Paper 93327, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Coupé, Tom, 2008. "The visibility of Ukrainian economists 1969-2005," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 2114-2125, October.
    12. André Lapidus, 2019. "Bringing them alive," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 1084-1106, November.
    13. David Colander, 2004. "Economics as an Ideologically Challenged Science," Middlebury College Working Paper Series 0422, Middlebury College, Department of Economics.
    14. Ivan Moscati, 2012. "How cardinal utility entered economic analysis during the Ordinal RevolutionLength: 31 pages," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf1205, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
    15. Anthony Endres, 2013. "Is the economics of time and ignorance a “classic”?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 26(1), pages 17-25, March.
    16. Geoffrey Brennan & Hartmut Kliemt, 2022. "An Albertian View of Buchanan’s Contractarianism," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 69-82, October.
    17. Michael De Vroey, 1988. "La teoría marxista del valor: Balance crítico de los debates recientes," Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía, issue 27, pages 73-110.
    18. Marek Hudik, 2020. "Equilibrium as compatibility of plans," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 349-368, October.
    19. Osipian, Ararat, 2004. "Reform of Economic Instruction in the Former Soviet Bloc," MPRA Paper 7589, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Philippe Mongin, 2018. "A game-theoretic analysis of the Waterloo campaign and some comments on the analytic narrative project," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 12(3), pages 451-480, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marxology; Soviet economic thought; political persecution; Stalinism.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B24 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Socialist; Marxist; Scraffian
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • P26 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Property Rights

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:17hum2013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.