IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/osloec/2011_019.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pareto improvements of Nash equilibria in differential games

Author

Listed:
  • Seierstad, Atle

    (Dept. of Economics, University of Oslo)

Abstract

This paper yields sufficient conditions for Pareto inoptimality of controls forming Nash equilibria in differential games. In Appendix a result on existence of open loop Nash equilibria is added.

Suggested Citation

  • Seierstad, Atle, 2011. "Pareto improvements of Nash equilibria in differential games," Memorandum 19/2011, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:osloec:2011_019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sv.uio.no/econ/english/research/unpublished-works/working-papers/pdf-files/2011/Memo-19-2011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dockner, Engelbert J. & Kaitala, Veijo, 1989. "On efficient equilibrium solutions in dynamic games of resource management," Resources and Energy, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 23-34, March.
    2. Chiarella, Carl, et al, 1984. "On the Economics of International Fisheries," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 25(1), pages 85-92, February.
    3. G. Martín-Herrán & G. Zaccour, 2005. "Credibility of Incentive Equilibrium Strategies in Linear-State Differential Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 126(2), pages 367-389, August.
    4. Lancaster, Kelvin, 1973. "The Dynamic Inefficiency of Capitalism," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(5), pages 1092-1109, Sept.-Oct.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Atle Seierstad, 2014. "Pareto Improvements of Nash Equilibria in Differential Games," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 363-375, September.
    2. Javier Frutos & Guiomar Martín-Herrán, 2015. "Does Flexibility Facilitate Sustainability of Cooperation Over Time? A Case Study from Environmental Economics," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 657-677, May.
    3. Rabah Amir & Niels Nannerup, 2006. "Information Structure and the Tragedy of the Commons in Resource Extraction," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 147-165, August.
    4. Ngo Long, 2011. "Dynamic Games in the Economics of Natural Resources: A Survey," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 115-148, March.
    5. Luca Grilli, 2008. "Resource extraction activity: an intergenerational approach with asymmetric players," Quaderni DSEMS lg_gta_2008, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Matematiche e Statistiche, Universita' di Foggia.
    6. Tasneem, Dina & Engle-Warnick, Jim & Benchekroun, Hassan, 2017. "An experimental study of a common property renewable resource game in continuous time," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 91-119.
    7. Javier Frutos & Guiomar Martín-Herrán, 2018. "Selection of a Markov Perfect Nash Equilibrium in a Class of Differential Games," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 620-636, September.
    8. Günther Rehme, 2007. "Economic Growth and (Re-)Distributive Policies in a Non-cooperative World," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 91(1), pages 1-40, May.
    9. Julio Huato, 2023. "Inequality and Growth: A Two-Player Dynamic Game with Production and Appropriation," Papers 2304.01855, arXiv.org.
    10. Geoffrey Fishburn & Murray C. Kemp, 2014. "The Gain from International Trade in Pool Goods and Private Goods," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 167-169, February.
    11. Leong, Chee Kian & Huang, Weihong, 2010. "A stochastic differential game of capitalism," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 552-561, July.
    12. Charles Morcom & Michael Kremer, 2000. "Elephants," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(1), pages 212-234, March.
      • Michael Kremer & Charles Morcom, 1996. "Elephants," NBER Working Papers 5674, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
      • Kremer, M. & Morcom, C., 1996. "Elephants," Working papers 96-17, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
    13. Rehme, Gunther, 2006. "Redistribution and economic growth in integrated economies," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 392-408, June.
    14. Leong, Chee Kian, 2008. "Capitalism and Economic Growth: A Game-Theoretic Perspective," MPRA Paper 10472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. James Robert E. Sampi Bravo, 2012. "Economic Growth And Redistribution: Evidence From Dynamic Games," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(2), pages 23-40.
    16. Jerker Denrell, 2000. "Radical Organization Theory," Rationality and Society, , vol. 12(1), pages 39-66, February.
    17. Luca Grilli, 2003. "Resource extraction activity: an intergenerational approach," Quaderni DSEMS 01-2003, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Matematiche e Statistiche, Universita' di Foggia.
    18. Rehme, G., 1999. "Why are the Data at Odds with Theory? Growth and (Re-)Distributive Policies in Integrated Economies," Economics Working Papers eco99/43, European University Institute.
    19. Cabo, Francisco & Erdlenbruch, Katrin & Tidball, Mabel, 2014. "Dynamic management of water transfer between two interconnected river basins," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 17-38.
    20. Krawczyk, Jacek B. & Shimomura, Koji, 2003. "Why countries with the same technology and preferences can have different growth rates," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(10), pages 1899-1916, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Differential games; Nash equilibria; Pareto improvements;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:osloec:2011_019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mari Strønstad Øverås (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/souiono.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.