IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/oruesi/2021_007.html

Bayesian model selection: Application to adjustment of fundamental physical constants

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The location-scale model is usually present in physics and chemistry in connection to the Birge ratio method for the adjustment of fundamental physical constants such as the Planck constant or the Newtonian constant of gravitation, while the random effects model is the commonly used approach for meta-analysis in medicine. These two competitive models are used to increase the quoted uncertainties of the measurement results to make them consistent. The intrinsic Bayes factor (IBF) is derived for the comparison of the random effects model to the location-scale model, and we answer the question which model performs better for the determination of the Newtonian constant of gravitation. The results of the empirical illustration support the application of the Birge ratio method which is currently used in the adjustment of the CODATA 2018 value for the Newtonian constant of gravitation together with its uncertainty. The results of the simulation study illustrate that the suggested procedure for model selection is decisive even when data consist of a few measurement results.

Suggested Citation

  • Bodnar, Olha & Eriksson, Viktor, 2021. "Bayesian model selection: Application to adjustment of fundamental physical constants," Working Papers 2021:7, Örebro University, School of Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:oruesi:2021_007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.oru.se/globalassets/oru-sv/institutioner/hh/workingpapers/workingpapers2021/wp-7-2021.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew L. Rukhin, 2013. "Estimating heterogeneity variance in meta-analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(3), pages 451-469, June.
    2. Julian P. T. Higgins & Simon G. Thompson & David J. Spiegelhalter, 2009. "A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(1), pages 137-159, January.
    3. Fernández, Carmen & Steel, Mark F. J., 1999. "Reference priors for the general location-scale modelm," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 377-384, July.
    4. S. Alighanbari & G. S. Giri & F. L. Constantin & V. I. Korobov & S. Schiller, 2020. "Precise test of quantum electrodynamics and determination of fundamental constants with HD+ ions," Nature, Nature, vol. 581(7807), pages 152-158, May.
    5. A. E. Ades & G. Lu & J. P. T. Higgins, 2005. "The Interpretation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis in Decision Models," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(6), pages 646-654, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bodnar, Olha, 2021. "Bayesian Model Selection for Small Datasets of Measurement Results," Working Papers 2021:6, Örebro University, School of Business.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhiqing Zhao & Faying Lin & Bennett Wang & Yihai Cao & Xu Hou & Yangang Wang, 2016. "Residential Proximity to Major Roadways and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Bodnar, Olha & Bodnar, Taras, 2025. "Birge ratio method for modeling dark uncertainty in multivariate meta-analyses and inter-laboratory studies," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Bodnar, Olha & Bodnar, Taras, 2021. "Objective Bayesian meta-analysis based on generalized multivariate random effects model," Working Papers 2021:5, Örebro University, School of Business.
    4. Rubio, F.J. & Steel, M.F.J., 2011. "Inference for grouped data with a truncated skew-Laplace distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3218-3231, December.
    5. Rongzhong Xu & Liubing Lin & Yong Li & Yan Li, 2017. "ShenQi FuZheng Injection combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Yeojin Chung & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Vincent Dorie & Andrew Gelman & Jingchen Liu, 2013. "A Nondegenerate Penalized Likelihood Estimator for Variance Parameters in Multilevel Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 685-709, October.
    7. Sofia Dias & Alex J. Sutton & Nicky J. Welton & A. E. Ades, 2013. "Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(5), pages 618-640, July.
    8. Amanda Kvarven & Eirik Strømland & Conny Wollbrant & David Andersson & Magnus Johannesson & Gustav Tinghög & Daniel Västfjäll & Kristian Ove R. Myrseth, 2020. "The intuitive cooperation hypothesis revisited: a meta-analytic examination of effect size and between-study heterogeneity," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 6(1), pages 26-42, June.
    9. Areti Angeliki Veroniki & Jesmin Antony & Sharon E Straus & Huda M Ashoor & Yaron Finkelstein & Paul A Khan & Marco Ghassemi & Erik Blondal & John D Ivory & Brian Hutton & Kevin Gough & Brenda R Hemme, 2018. "Comparative safety and effectiveness of perinatal antiretroviral therapies for HIV-infected women and their children: Systematic review and network meta-analysis including different study designs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Łukasz D. Kaczmarek & Patrycja Chwiłkowska & Maciej Behnke & Dariusz Drążkowski, 2025. "Video game play and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: a meta-analysis of global findings," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Fabio Vieira & Roger Leenders & Joris Mulder, 2024. "Fast meta-analytic approximations for relational event models: applications to data streams and multilevel data," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1823-1859, October.
    12. Cinar, Ozan & Nakagawa, Shinichi & Viechtbauer, Wolfgang, 2020. "Phylogenetic multilevel meta-analysis: A simulation study on the importance of modeling the phylogeny," EcoEvoRxiv su4zv, Center for Open Science.
    13. Ravi Shankar Reddy & Kumar Gular & Snehil Dixit & Praveen Kumar Kandakurti & Jaya Shanker Tedla & Ajay Prashad Gautam & Devika Rani Sangadala, 2022. "Impact of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) on Functional Ambulation in Stroke Patients—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Bakbergenuly, Ilyas & Hoaglin, David C. & Kulinskaya, Elena, 2020. "Simulation study of estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analyses of log-response-ratio for normal data," MetaArXiv 3bnxs, Center for Open Science.
    15. Xiaowei Gong & Boyun Yuan & Yadong Yuan, 2022. "Incidence and prognostic value of pulmonary embolism in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Nelson, Jon Paul, 2020. "Fixed-effect versus random-effects meta-analysis in economics: A study of pass-through rates for alcohol beverage excise taxes," Economics Discussion Papers 2020-1, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    17. Ibrahim Y. Tawbe, 2023. "Environmental disclosure programs and birth weight: a meta- analysis," Working Papers 2023-02, CRESE.
    18. Milad Azami & Marzieh Parizad Nasirkandy & Hadi Esmaeili Gouvarchin Ghaleh & Reza Ranjbar, 2022. "COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Gaofeng Cai & Hongjie Zheng & Lan Luo & Zhengting Wang & Zhenggang Jiang & Shuangfei Xu & Huakun Lv & Yongdi Chen & Biao Zhou & Chonggao Hu, 2019. "Factors Correlating to the Development of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Hemodialysis Patients—Findings Mainly from Asiatic Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Fanjie Meng & Xiangpo Pan & Wenzhen Tong, 2018. "Rifampicin versus streptomycin for brucellosis treatment in humans: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics
    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:oruesi:2021_007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ieoruse.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.