IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v205y2025ics0047259x24000836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Birge ratio method for modeling dark uncertainty in multivariate meta-analyses and inter-laboratory studies

Author

Listed:
  • Bodnar, Olha
  • Bodnar, Taras

Abstract

In the paper, we introduce a new approach for combining multivariate measurements obtained in individual studies. The procedure extends the Birge ratio method, a commonly used approach in physics in the univariate case, such as for the determination of physical constants, to multivariate observations. Statistical inference procedures are derived for the parameters of the multivariate location-scale model, which is related to the multivariate Birge ratio method. The new approach provides an alternative to the methods based on the application of the multivariate random effects model, which is commonly used for multivariate meta-analyses and inter-laboratory comparisons. In two empirical illustrations, we show that the introduced multivariate Birge ratio approach yields confidence intervals for the elements of the overall mean vector that are considerably narrower than those obtained by the methods derived under the multivariate random effects model.

Suggested Citation

  • Bodnar, Olha & Bodnar, Taras, 2025. "Birge ratio method for modeling dark uncertainty in multivariate meta-analyses and inter-laboratory studies," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:205:y:2025:i:c:s0047259x24000836
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2024.105376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047259X24000836
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jmva.2024.105376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julian P. T. Higgins & Simon G. Thompson & David J. Spiegelhalter, 2009. "A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(1), pages 137-159, January.
    2. Andrew L. Rukhin, 2017. "Estimation of the common mean from heterogeneous normal observations with unknown variances," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(5), pages 1601-1618, November.
    3. William E. Strawderman & Andrew L. Rukhin, 2010. "Simultaneous estimation and reduction of nonconformity in interlaboratory studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(2), pages 219-234, March.
    4. Andrew L. Rukhin, 2013. "Estimating heterogeneity variance in meta-analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(3), pages 451-469, June.
    5. Crippa, Alessio & Orsini, Nicola, 2016. "Multivariate Dose-Response Meta-Analysis: The dosresmeta R Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 72(c01).
    6. Samaradasa Weerahandi & Ching-Ray Yu, 2020. "Exact distributions of statistics for making inferences on mixed models under the default covariance structure," Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Han Chen & Alisa K. Manning & Josée Dupuis, 2012. "A Method of Moments Estimator for Random Effect Multivariate Meta-Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1278-1284, December.
    8. Bodnar, Olha & Bodnar, Taras, 2024. "Gibbs sampler approach for objective Bayesian inference in elliptical multivariate meta-analysis random effects model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bodnar, Olha & Bodnar, Taras, 2021. "Objective Bayesian meta-analysis based on generalized multivariate random effects model," Working Papers 2021:5, Örebro University, School of Business.
    2. Bodnar, Olha & Bodnar, Taras, 2024. "Gibbs sampler approach for objective Bayesian inference in elliptical multivariate meta-analysis random effects model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Elena Kulinskaya & Stephan Morgenthaler & Robert G. Staudte, 2014. "Combining Statistical Evidence," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 214-242, August.
    4. Bodnar, Olha & Eriksson, Viktor, 2021. "Bayesian model selection: Application to adjustment of fundamental physical constants," Working Papers 2021:7, Örebro University, School of Business.
    5. Ito, Tsubasa & Sugasawa, Shonosuke, 2021. "Improved confidence regions in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Yeojin Chung & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Vincent Dorie & Andrew Gelman & Jingchen Liu, 2013. "A Nondegenerate Penalized Likelihood Estimator for Variance Parameters in Multilevel Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 685-709, October.
    7. Sofia Dias & Alex J. Sutton & Nicky J. Welton & A. E. Ades, 2013. "Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(5), pages 618-640, July.
    8. Amanda Kvarven & Eirik Strømland & Conny Wollbrant & David Andersson & Magnus Johannesson & Gustav Tinghög & Daniel Västfjäll & Kristian Ove R. Myrseth, 2020. "The intuitive cooperation hypothesis revisited: a meta-analytic examination of effect size and between-study heterogeneity," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 6(1), pages 26-42, June.
    9. Morris, Tim P & White, Ian R & Pham, Tra My & Quartagno, Matteo, 2023. "How to check a simulation study," OSF Preprints cbr72, Center for Open Science.
    10. Nelson, Jon Paul, 2020. "Fixed-effect versus random-effects meta-analysis in economics: A study of pass-through rates for alcohol beverage excise taxes," Economics Discussion Papers 2020-1, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    11. Ibrahim Y. Tawbe, 2023. "Environmental disclosure programs and birth weight: a meta- analysis," Working Papers 2023-02, CRESE.
    12. Alberto Aiolfi & Emanuele Asti & Emanuele Rausa & Giulia Bonavina & Gianluca Bonitta & Luigi Bonavina, 2018. "Use of C-reactive protein for the early prediction of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Shijie Ren & Jeremy E. Oakley & John W. Stevens, 2018. "Incorporating Genuine Prior Information about Between-Study Heterogeneity in Random Effects Pairwise and Network Meta-analyses," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(4), pages 531-542, May.
    14. repec:osf:metaar:3bnxs_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Ajaree Rayanakorn & Hooi-Leng Ser & Priyia Pusparajah & Kok-Gan Chan & Bey Hing Goh & Tahir Mehmood Khan & Surasak Saokaew & Shaun Wen Huey Lee & Learn-Han Lee, 2020. "Comparative efficacy of antibiotic(s) alone or in combination of corticosteroids in adults with acute bacterial meningitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Dan Jackson & Sylwia Bujkiewicz & Martin Law & Richard D. Riley & Ian R. White, 2018. "A matrix†based method of moments for fitting multivariate network meta†analysis models with multiple outcomes and random inconsistency effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 548-556, June.
    17. repec:osf:metaar:2bj85_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Tomáš Havránek, 2009. "Rose Effect and the Euro: The Magic is Gone," Working Papers IES 2009/20, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Aug 2009.
    19. Ratko Peric & Zoran Nikolovski & Marco Meucci & Philippe Tadger & Carlo Ferri Marini & Francisco José Amaro-Gahete, 2022. "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Cebiroglu, Gökhan & Hautsch, Nikolaus & Walsh, Christopher, 2019. "Revisiting the stealth trading hypothesis: Does time-varying liquidity explain the size-effect?," CFS Working Paper Series 625, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    21. Richard A Hubner & Richard D Riley & Lucinda J Billingham & Sanjay Popat, 2011. "Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1 (ERCC1) Status and Lung Cancer Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies and Recommendations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-10, October.
    22. Luisa C Eggenschwiler & Anne W S Rutjes & Sarah N Musy & Dietmar Ausserhofer & Natascha M Nielen & René Schwendimann & Maria Unbeck & Michael Simon, 2022. "Variation in detected adverse events using trigger tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:205:y:2025:i:c:s0047259x24000836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.