IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/halshs-03693381.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Compétition électorale, biais des électeurs et femmes en politique

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Le Barbanchon

    (Bocconi University [Milan, Italy])

  • Julien Sauvagnat

    (Bocconi University [Milan, Italy])

Abstract

Dans le monde, à peine un quart des parlementaires sont des femmes. Malgré des progrès significatifs ces dernières années, les femmes restent largement sous-représentées parmi les élus politiques. Cette étude apporte des éléments d'explications à la sous-représentation des femmes en politique grâce à des données sur les sept dernières élections législatives françaises. D'une part, les analyses suggèrent qu'il existe un « biais » de préférence des électeurs vis-à-vis des candidats masculins. De plus, les partis politiques contribuent à reproduire la sous-représentation des femmes à des fonctions électives en présentant moins de candidates dans les circonscriptions électorales où le biais des électeurs est élevé. Pour favoriser l'accès des femmes à l'exercice politique, la Loi tendant à favoriser l'égal accès des femmes et des hommes aux mandats électoraux et fonctions électives de 2000, aussi appelée « Loi parité », oblige les partis politiques français à présenter 50 % de femmes parmi leurs candidats sous peine de sanctions financières. Comme attendu, l'application de cette loi a permis une progression de la part de femmes parmi les candidats. Néanmoins, elle devient relativement plus faible dans les circonscriptions où le scrutin est serré que dans celles où la majorité est plus largement obtenue. Dans ces circonscriptions « concurrentielles », le paiement d'une amende en cas de dérogation à la règle de parité s'avère plus avantageux comparativement au risque de perdre l'élection en présentant une femme plutôt qu'un homme. Cela suggère que les partis préfèrent encore mettre en avant des candidats plutôt que des candidates pour augmenter leurs chances de remporter le scrutin.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Le Barbanchon & Julien Sauvagnat, 2022. "Compétition électorale, biais des électeurs et femmes en politique," Working Papers halshs-03693381, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03693381
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03693381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03693381/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bertrand, Marianne, 2011. "New Perspectives on Gender," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 17, pages 1543-1590, Elsevier.
    2. Bagues, Manuel & Campa, Pamela, 2021. "Can gender quotas in candidate lists empower women? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    3. Pablo Casas-Arce & Albert Saiz, 2015. "Women and Power: Unpopular, Unwilling, or Held Back?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 123(3), pages 641-669.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre Deschamps, 2018. "Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: a Boon or a Bane for Women?," Sciences Po publications 82, Sciences Po.
    2. Thomas Le & Julien Sauvagnat, 2022. "Electoral Competition, Voter Bias, and Women in Politics," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(1), pages 352-394.
    3. Thomas Le Barbanchon & Julien Sauvagnat, 2022. "Compétition électorale, biais des électeurs et femmes en politique," Post-Print halshs-03693381, HAL.
    4. Alessandra Casarico & Paola Profeta, 2020. "Introduction Special Issue “On Gender Perspectives in Public Economics”," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 235(4), pages 3-10, December.
    5. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7bucmgmilh9ul9ogmiku5legh5 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Paola Profeta & Eleanor Woodhouse, 2018. "Do Electoral Rules Matter for Female Representation?," Working Papers 121, "Carlo F. Dondena" Centre for Research on Social Dynamics (DONDENA), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi.
    7. Kantorowicz, Jarosław & Köppl-Turyna, Monika, 2020. "Electoral systems and female representation in politics: Evidence from a regression discontinuity," Working Papers 20, Agenda Austria.
    8. Jean-Benoît Eymeoud & Paul Vertier, 2018. "Gender Biases: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in French Local Elections," Post-Print hal-03393139, HAL.
    9. Jean-Benoît Eyméoud & Paul Vertier, 2023. "Gender biases: evidence from a natural experiment in French local elections," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 38(113), pages 3-56.
    10. Eva Ranehill & Roberto A. Weber, 2022. "Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(3), pages 845-875, June.
    11. Casarico, Alessandra & Lattanzio, Salvatore & Profeta, Paola, 2022. "Women and local public finance," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Israel García & Bernd Hayo, 2023. "Fiscal Reform in Spanish Municipalities: Gender Differences in Budgetary Adjustment," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202306, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    13. Hessami, Zohal & da Fonseca, Mariana Lopes, 2020. "Female political representation and substantive effects on policies: A literature review," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Chauvin, Juan Pablo & Tricaud, Clemence, 2022. "Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Crisis Response," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12411, Inter-American Development Bank.
    15. Pierre Deschamps, 2018. "Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: a Boon or a Bane for Women?," Post-Print hal-03393117, HAL.
    16. Britto, Diogo G.C. & Fiorin, Stefano, 2020. "Corruption and legislature size: Evidence from Brazil," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Lippmann, Quentin, 2021. "Are gender quotas on candidates bound to be ineffective?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 661-678.
    18. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/3k0m7r593p8gs9njjtpupmlknu is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Gabriela DRÄ‚GAN & Cezar TECLEAN, 2023. "Impact Of The Feminization Of Political Management On The Regulatory Framework: Evidence From The European Union," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(3), pages 5-21, September.
    20. Carozzi, Felipe & Gago, Andrés, 2023. "Who promotes gender-sensitive policies?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 371-405.
    21. Nicolas Fremeaux & Paul Maarek, 2023. "Less but better? The influence of gender on political activity," Working Papers hal-04039563, HAL.
    22. Jean-Benoît Eymeoud & Paul Vertier, 2018. "Gender Biases: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in French Local Elections," Post-Print hal-03393139, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03693381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.