IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-03629443.html

Vers une régulation concurrentielle des plateformes

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Jullien

    (TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Wilfried Sand-Zantman

    (ESSEC Business School)

Abstract

L'économie a été bouleversée depuis une vingtaine d'années par l'émergence de nouveaux acteurs dont l'activité est essentiellement numérique. Ces acteurs ont non seulement créé de nouveaux services mais également pris la place d'anciens acteurs dans le monde physique pour proposer des services concurrents. Il y a deux raisons qui empêchent de comparer cette émergence à l'entrée classique de nouveaux acteurs sur un marché. Tout d'abord, cette entrée s'est faite avec des technologies très différentes. Les magasins physiques ont disparu au profit de sites web spécialisés. Les nouvelles technologies de l'information fondées sur la digitalisation ont exacerbé le rôle de l'innovation dans la concurrence et l'importance des effets de réseau au niveau des offres et des demandes. Par ailleurs, le mode opératoire de la distribution a été transformée. Alors que l'organisation traditionnelle de nombreuses industries consistaient en un mode de distribution vertical, des intermédiaires achetant et revendant les biens, l'organisation dans l'économie numérique est caractérisée pour une large part par le modèle d'agence dans lequel des plateformes intermédient les relations entre acheteurs et vendeurs sans posséder les biens échangés

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Jullien & Wilfried Sand-Zantman, 2020. "Vers une régulation concurrentielle des plateformes," Working Papers hal-03629443, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03629443
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03629443v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03629443v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:hal:journl:hal-03095347 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jullien, Bruno & Sand-Zantman, Wilfried, 2021. "The Economics of Platforms: A Theory Guide for Competition Policy," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    3. Ilya Segal & Michael D. Whinston, 2007. "Antitrust in Innovative Industries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1703-1730, December.
    4. Peter Alexiadis & Alexandre de Streel, 2020. "Designing an EU Intervention Standard for Digital Platforms," RSCAS Working Papers 2020/14, European University Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meena Jagadeesan & Michael I. Jordan & Jacob Steinhardt, 2024. "Safety vs. Performance: How Multi-Objective Learning Reduces Barriers to Market Entry," Papers 2409.03734, arXiv.org.
    2. Katz, Michael L., 2021. "Big Tech mergers: Innovation, competition for the market, and the acquisition of emerging competitors," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    3. Denicolò, Vincenzo & Zanchettin, Piercarlo, 2012. "A dynamic model of patent portfolio races," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 924-927.
    4. Thomas Hellmann & Veikko Thiele, 2019. "Fostering Entrepreneurship: Promoting Founding or Funding?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2502-2521, June.
    5. Zhiyong Liu & Yue Qiao, 2012. "Abuse of Market Dominance Under China’s 2007 Anti-monopoly Law: A Preliminary Assessment," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 41(1), pages 77-107, August.
    6. Vincent Malardé & Thierry Pénard, 2022. "The role of local network effects and spatial effects in the growth of digital platforms: Evidence from the carpooling site iDVROOM [Le rôle des effets de réseau locaux et des effets spatiaux dans le développement des plateformes numériques : le c," Post-Print hal-03712336, HAL.
    7. Brett Hollenbeck, 2020. "Horizontal mergers and innovation in concentrated industries," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-37, March.
    8. Amit Kumar Bardhan & Saad Ashraf, 2024. "More buyers or more sellers: on marketing resource allocation strategies of competing two-sided platforms," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2579-2608, December.
    9. Zhijun Chen & Chongwoo Choe & Jiajia Cong & Noriaki Matsushima, 2022. "Data‐driven mergers and personalization," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(1), pages 3-31, March.
    10. Immordino, Giovanni & Polo, Michele, 2014. "Antitrust, legal standards and investment," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 36-50.
    11. Joshua S. Gans & David B. Ridley, 2013. "Innovation Incentives under Transferable Fast-Track Regulatory Review," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 789-816, September.
    12. Miao, Chun-Hui, 2016. "Licensing a technology standard," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 33-61.
    13. Ajay Bhaskarabhatla & Enrico Pennings, 2012. "Defensive Disclosure under Antitrust Enforcement," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 12-010/2, Tinbergen Institute.
    14. Bergantiños, Gustavo & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D., 2025. "The Shapley index for music streaming platforms," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. John P. Conley, 2024. "Information economies with taste diversity and bounded attention spans," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(3), pages 1175-1207, October.
    16. Chen, J. & Elliott, M. & Koh, A., 2020. "Capability Accumulation and Conglomeratization in the Information Age," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2069, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    17. Xia, Shiyun, 2024. "Antitrust regulation, innovation and industry dynamics," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    18. Hugo Hopenhayn & Matthew Mitchell, 2012. "Rewarding Duopoly Innovators: The Price of Exclusivity," NBER Chapters, in: Standards, Patents and Innovations, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Jonathan B. Baker, 2016. "Exclusionary Conduct of Dominant Firms, R&D Competition, and Innovation," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 48(3), pages 269-287, May.
    20. Jan Boone & Jacob K. Goeree, 2010. "Optimal market design," IEW - Working Papers 479, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03629443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.