IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-01627824.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Observatory of Strategic Developments Impacting Urban Logistics (2017 version)

Author

Listed:
  • Laetitia Dablanc

    (IFSTTAR/AME/SPLOTT - Systèmes Productifs, Logistique, Organisation des Transports et Travail - IFSTTAR - Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux - Communauté Université Paris-Est)

  • Zeting Liu

    (IFSTTAR/AME/SPLOTT - Systèmes Productifs, Logistique, Organisation des Transports et Travail - IFSTTAR - Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux - Communauté Université Paris-Est)

  • Martin Koning

    (IFSTTAR/AME/SPLOTT - Systèmes Productifs, Logistique, Organisation des Transports et Travail - IFSTTAR - Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux - Communauté Université Paris-Est)

  • Jens Klauenberg

    (DLR Institute of Transport Research - DLR - Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt [Berlin])

  • Leise Kelli de Oliveira

    (UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais = Federal University of Minas Gerais [Belo Horizonte, Brazil])

  • Corinne Blanquart

    (IFSTTAR/AME/SPLOTT - Systèmes Productifs, Logistique, Organisation des Transports et Travail - IFSTTAR - Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux - Communauté Université Paris-Est)

  • François Combes

    (IFSTTAR/AME/SPLOTT - Systèmes Productifs, Logistique, Organisation des Transports et Travail - IFSTTAR - Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux - Communauté Université Paris-Est)

  • Nicolas Coulombel

    (LVMT - Laboratoire Ville, Mobilité, Transport - IFSTTAR - Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech)

  • Mathieu Gardrat

    (LAET - Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Adeline Heitz

    (IFSTTAR/AME/SPLOTT - Systèmes Productifs, Logistique, Organisation des Transports et Travail - IFSTTAR - Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux - Communauté Université Paris-Est)

  • Saskia Seidel

    (IFSTTAR/AME/SPLOTT - Systèmes Productifs, Logistique, Organisation des Transports et Travail - IFSTTAR - Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux - Communauté Université Paris-Est)

Abstract

Urban freight living labs need to operate in full recognition of the challenges that will shape the mobility of goods in urban areas in the future. These challenges are several: macro economic, micro-economic, demographic, technological, societal, and legal. To help CITYLAB cities implement their urban freight initiatives, a better understanding of these challenges is necessary. This is what this Observatory of strategic developments impacting urban logistics intends to do, by providing data and analysis on some of the most important, or less well known, trends that will shape the urban mobility of goods in the future. This second version (2017) of the Observatory provides data and analyses on 1) Logistics Sprawl; and 2) E-commerce. Our findings about the main impacts of these two trends for cities involved in urban freight living labs are the following: - The number of logistics facilities (in their diversity: warehouses, fulfilment centres, distribution centres, cross-dock terminals) is increasing in cities, especially cities of some logistics importance as large consumer markets and/or logistics hubs processing the flow of goods generated by the global economy. These facilities are generally located in suburban areas, but a new niche market of urban warehouses is emerging. - Both e-commerce and logistics sprawl generate a rise in freight vehicles in urban areas, dominated by small vehicles, while medium to large lorries are relatively less important. These vehicles performing delivery operations are visible in neighbourhoods and a times of day when they were not identified before: residential neighbourhoods, residential building blocks, side streets, in the early evening and on week-ends. Emerging new types of vehicles (clean delivery vehicles, two and three wheelers) are now visible in urban centres. - Innovations in the urban supply chains include diverse forms of pick-up points and click-and-collect solutions, while the recent but extremely rapid rise in technologies and algorithms supporting instant deliveries (on-demand deliveries within less than two hours) brings with it a flourish of new companies connecting customers, suppliers and independent couriers, often using bicycles. - The overall impact of these new trends on energy and carbon emission related to urban freight is difficult to assess. Urban freight in general, for the Paris region, brings the following environmental impact: the share of traffic-related CO2, NOx and PM10 due to urban freight is 2.5 times larger than the share of vans and trucks in the regional traffic. The contribution of urban freight to air pollution is larger in the city of Paris. Social costs of air pollution caused by road traffic in general amount to 0.9% of the regional GDP in 2012. Some of the new trends bring more CO2 emissions, such as the relocation of logistics facilities far away in the suburbs, as de-consolidated shipments are delivered to urban consumers and businesses in smaller and more numerous vans. Some trends bring less CO2 emissions, with a rise in cleaner vehicles and innovative solutions such as drop-off/pickup points or bike-supported instant deliveries. Substitution patterns between personal mobility and professional freight mobility can be a good, or a bad, thing for CO2 emissions, depending on the initial circumstances and the way personal shopping was done before online orders. - What is certain is that these changes bring diversity in the urban traffic flow. Instant couriers are using all sorts of transport modes, including foot, bicycles, electrically assisted cargocycles, motorbikes, and various types of vans and lorries. This can negatively impact traffic management, road safety and conflicts in road uses, congestion, air pollution. Also, the trends we have looked at bring new types of urban jobs, with many unresolved legal issues and poor working conditions in many instances. New types of logistics buildings bring architectural diversity and innovation in cities, but also complaints about noise, aesthetics, as well as congestion and pollution at entrance and exit points. - These environmental and social impacts have been so far poorly documented and researched. Consumers are the main drivers of the changes we have observed, but they are also the residents or visitors of urban areas, and for that they carry an important share of the burdens, as well as the benefits, of the new landscape of urban logistics.

Suggested Citation

  • Laetitia Dablanc & Zeting Liu & Martin Koning & Jens Klauenberg & Leise Kelli de Oliveira & Corinne Blanquart & François Combes & Nicolas Coulombel & Mathieu Gardrat & Adeline Heitz & Saskia Seidel, 2017. "Observatory of Strategic Developments Impacting Urban Logistics (2017 version)," Working Papers hal-01627824, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01627824
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01627824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01627824/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 2012. "Transportation Research Forum," 53rd Annual Transportation Research Forum, Tampa, Florida, March 15-17, 2012 207218, Transportation Research Forum.
    2. Bowen, John T., 2008. "Moving places: the geography of warehousing in the US," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 379-387.
    3. Edward L. Glaeser & Janet E. Kohlhase, 2004. "Cities, regions and the decline of transport costs," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Raymond J. G. M. Florax & David A. Plane (ed.), Fifty Years of Regional Science, pages 197-228, Springer.
    4. Goethals, Frank & Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, Aurélie & Tütüncü, Yazgi, 2012. "French consumers' perceptions of the unattended delivery model for e-grocery retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 133-139.
    5. Zapfel, Gunther & Wasner, Michael, 2002. "Planning and optimization of hub-and-spoke transportation networks of cooperative third-party logistics providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 207-220, July.
    6. Bruno Durand & Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu, 2012. "Urban Logistics and E-Grocery: Have Proximity Delivery Services a Positive Impact on Shopping Trips? [Logistique urbaine et épicerie en ligne : les services de livraison de proximité ont-ils un imp," Post-Print hal-01770406, HAL.
    7. Clarence Woudsma & Paul Jakubicek & Laetitia Dablanc, 2015. "Logistics sprawl in North America: methodological issues and a case study in Toronto," Post-Print hal-01254415, HAL.
    8. Markus Hesse, 2004. "Land For Logistics: Locational Dynamics, Real Estate Markets And Political Regulation Of Regional Distribution Complexes," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(2), pages 162-173, April.
    9. Schenk, Tilman A. & Loffler, Gunter & Rauh, Jurgen, 2007. "Agent-based simulation of consumer behavior in grocery shopping on a regional level," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(8), pages 894-903, August.
    10. Carlos F. Daganzo, 2005. "Logistics Systems Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-27516-9, September.
    11. Michèle Guilbault & Elisabeth Gouvernal & Marie Lebaudy & Barbara Lenz & Sebastian Schneider & Katia Kohler, 2010. "Links between production systems and transport : the example of German and French industries," Post-Print hal-00615153, HAL.
    12. Nakamura, Kazuki & Hayashi, Yoshitsugu, 2013. "Strategies and instruments for low-carbon urban transport: An international review on trends and effects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 264-274.
    13. Laetitia Dablanc & Scott Ogilvie & Anne Goodchild, 2014. "Logistics Sprawl: Differential Warehousing Development Patterns in Los Angeles and Seattle," Post-Print hal-00944130, HAL.
    14. Dablanc, Laetitia & Ross, Catherine, 2012. "Atlanta: a mega logistics center in the Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion (PAM)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 432-442.
    15. Julian Allen & Michael Browne & Tom Cherrett, 2012. "Survey Techniques in Urban Freight Transport Studies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 287-311, February.
    16. Maurizio Faccio & Mauro Gamberi, 2015. "New City Logistics Paradigm: From the “Last Mile” to the “Last 50 Miles” Sustainable Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-22, November.
    17. Santos, Georgina & Behrendt, Hannah & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2010. "Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 46-91.
    18. Eléonora Morganti & Laetitia Dablanc & François Fortin, 2014. "Final deliveries for online shopping: the deployment of pickup point networks in urban and suburban areas," Post-Print hal-01067223, HAL.
    19. Wygonik, Erica & Goodchild, Anne, 2012. "Evaluating the Efficacy of Shared-use Vehicles for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A U.S. Case Study of Grocery Delivery," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 51(2).
    20. Jean‐Paul Rodrigue, 2004. "Freight, Gateways And Mega‐Urban Regions: The Logistical Integration Of The Bostwash Corridor1," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(2), pages 147-161, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas Raimbault & Adeline Heitz & Laetitia Dablanc, 2018. "Urban planning policies for logistics facilities: a comparison between US metropolitan areas and the Paris region," Post-Print hal-02086893, HAL.
    2. François Combes, 2019. "Equilibrium and Optimal Location of Warehouses in Urban Areas: A Theoretical Analysis with Implications for Urban Logistics," Post-Print hal-03272805, HAL.
    3. Laetitia Dablanc & Eléonora Morganti & Niklas Arvidsson & Johan Woxenius & Michael Browne & Neila Saidi, 2017. "The Rise of On-Demand 'Instant Deliveries' in European Cities," Post-Print hal-01589316, HAL.
    4. Laetitia Dablanc & Michel Savy & Pierre Veltz & Axel Culoz & Muriel Vincent, 2017. "Des marchandises dans la ville : Un enjeu social, environnemental et économique majeur," Working Papers hal-01627851, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laetitia Dablanc & Corinne Blanquart & Adeline Heitz & Jens Klausberg & Zeting Liu & Martin Koning & Leise Kelli de Oliveira & François Combes, 2016. "Observatory of Strategic Developments Impacting Urban Logistics (2016 version)," Working Papers hal-01921116, HAL.
    2. Klauenberg, Jens & Elsner, Lucas-Andrés & Knischewski, Christian, 2020. "Dynamics of the spatial distribution of hubs in groupage networks – The case of Berlin," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Aljohani, Khalid & Thompson, Russell G., 2016. "Impacts of logistics sprawl on the urban environment and logistics: Taxonomy and review of literature," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 255-263.
    4. Kang, Sanggyun, 2020. "Warehouse location choice: A case study in Los Angeles, CA," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Kang, Sanggyun, 2020. "Why do warehouses decentralize more in certain metropolitan areas?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. Dablanc, Laetitia & Ross, Catherine, 2012. "Atlanta: a mega logistics center in the Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion (PAM)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 432-442.
    7. Gardrat, Mathieu, 2021. "Urban growth and freight transport: From sprawl to distension," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Giuliano, Genevieve & Kang, Sanggyun & Yuan, Quan, 2016. "Spatial Dynamics of the Logistics Industry and Implications for Freight Flows," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt94h6t7s9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Oliveira, Leise Kelli de & Lopes, Gabriela Pereira & Oliveira, Renata Lúcia Magalhães de & Bracarense, Lílian dos Santos Fontes Pereira & Pitombo, Cira Souza, 2022. "An investigation of contributing factors for warehouse location and the relationship between local attributes and explanatory variables of Warehouse Freight Trip Generation Model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 206-219.
    10. Sakai, Takanori & Kawamura, Kazuya & Hyodo, Tetsuro, 2015. "Locational dynamics of logistics facilities: Evidence from Tokyo," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 10-19.
    11. Oliveira, Renata Lúcia Magalhães de & Dablanc, Laetitia & Schorung, Matthieu, 2022. "Changes in warehouse spatial patterns and rental prices: Are they related? Exploring the case of US metropolitan areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    12. Woudsma, Clarence & Jakubicek, Paul, 2020. "Logistics land use patterns in metropolitan Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Giuliano, Genevieve & Kang, Sanggyun, 2018. "Spatial dynamics of the logistics industry: Evidence from California," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 248-258.
    14. Gingerich, Kevin & Maoh, Hanna, 2019. "The role of airport proximity on warehouse location and associated truck trips: Evidence from Toronto, Ontario," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 97-109.
    15. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    16. Meiling He & Jiaren Shen & Xiaohui Wu & Jianqiang Luo, 2018. "Logistics Space: A Literature Review from the Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    17. Adelheid Holl & Ilaria Mariotti, 2018. "The Geography of Logistics Firm Location: The Role of Accessibility," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 337-361, June.
    18. Kang, Sanggyun, 2022. "Exploring the contextual factors behind various phases in logistics sprawl: The case of Seoul Metropolitan Area, South Korea," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    19. David Guerrero & Jean Paul Hubert & Martin Koning & Nicolas Roelandt, 2022. "On the Spatial Scope of Warehouse Activity: An Exploratory Study in France," Post-Print hal-03551270, HAL.
    20. Jaller, Miguel & Pineda, Leticia, 2017. "Warehousing and Distribution Center Facilities in Southern California: The Use of the Commodity Flow Survey Data to Identify Logistics Sprawl and Freight Generation Patterns," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5dz0j1gg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01627824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.