IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-04319831.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La dualité dans la BITD

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvain Moura

    (Ministère des armées – Ministère de la défense [France] (1946-....))

Abstract

Pour les entreprises productrices d'armement, la dualité peut se définir par la coexistence entre une production à destination militaire et une autre à destination civile. Cette coexistence est notamment encouragée par les pouvoirs publics. Sur le plan de la rentabilité économique, les entreprises peuvent compenser une baisse de l'activité militaire par un rebond de l'activité civile, et vice versa. Sur le plan technologique, il est attendu qu'elles tirent profit des deux productions pour innover, les découvertes réalisées dans le domaine militaire profitant à la recherche pour la production civile (spin-off) et réciproquement (spin-in) [Bellais et Guichard, 2006 ; Acosta et alii, 2011]. Cette orientation peut conduire à une intégration civile-militaire poussée, avec des processus de production caractérisés par une frontière de plus en plus floue entre les deux et, consécutivement, une mesure difficile de la production militaire par rapport à la production civile [Dunne, 1995]. Toutefois, la connaissance du taux de dépendance 1 des sociétés aux marchés militaires est un indicateur utile, s'agissant par exemple des politiques de reconversion. Il contribue à définir des critères d'intervention publique ou à déterminer l'ampleur des mesures de reconversion qui sont à mettre en oeuvre [Fontanel, 1994 ; Hooper et Cox, 1996]. Le suivi des taux de dépendance dans le temps représente aussi un indicateur de la recomposition du tissu industriel de l'armement. À terme, il permet de saisir les stratégies des entreprises à la suite d'évolution de la demande : quelles sont celles qui se diversifient ou, au contraire, celles qui restent très dépendantes à la production de défense ? Cet Ecodef propose un éclairage sur la dualité dans la base industrielle et technologique de défense (BITD) française. Il présente tout d'abord une population des entreprises de la BITD (partie 1). Il explique ensuite la façon dont est estimé leur chiffre d'affaires militaire (partie 2), utilisé pour donner une évaluation statistique de la dualité (partie 3).

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvain Moura, 2014. "La dualité dans la BITD," Post-Print halshs-04319831, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04319831
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04319831v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04319831v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith Hartley & Todd Sandler (ed.), 2007. "Handbook of Defense Economics," Handbook of Defense Economics, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 2, number 1.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1397 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Hartley, Keith, 2007. "The Arms Industry, Procurement and Industrial Policies," Handbook of Defense Economics, in: Keith Hartley & Todd Sandler (ed.), Handbook of Defense Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 33, pages 1139-1176, Elsevier.
    4. Dunne, J. Paul, 1995. "The defense industrial base," Handbook of Defense Economics, in: Keith Hartley & Todd Sandler (ed.), Handbook of Defense Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 14, pages 399-430, Elsevier.
    5. Manuel Acosta & Daniel Coronado & Rosario Marin, 2011. "Potential Dual-Use Of Military Technology: Does Citing Patents Shed Light On This Process?," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 335-349.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abigail R. Hall, 2025. "Contemporary Issues in Defense and Peace Economics: An Introduction to the Symposium," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 51(1), pages 1-6, January.
    2. Coyne,Christopher J., 2020. "Defense, Peace, and War Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108724036, January.
    3. Economou, Emmanouel/Marios/Lazaros & Metaxas, Theodore, 2011. "EU and US security policy from the cold war era to the 21st century: the institutional evolution of cfsp and the factors that determine the American military supremacy," MPRA Paper 41003, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
    4. Susan J. Guthrie & Hines, James R. Jr., 2011. "U.S. DEFENSE CONTRACTS DURING the TAX EXPENDITURE BATTLES of the 1980s," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 64(2), pages 731-751, June.
    5. Marcus Matthias Keupp, 2021. "Effectiveness of Military Performance," Springer Books, in: Defense Economics, chapter 0, pages 67-91, Springer.
    6. Renaud Bellais & Martial Foucault & Jean-Michel Oudot, 2014. "Économie de la défense," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01052607, HAL.
    7. Sylvain Moura, 2013. "La concentration des marchés d'armement," Post-Print halshs-04319834, HAL.
    8. Christopher Coyne, 2015. "Lobotomizing the defense brain," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 28(4), pages 371-396, December.
    9. Hall Abigail R., 2015. "Drones: Public Interest, Public Choice, and the Expansion of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(2), pages 273-300, April.
    10. J. Paul Dunne & Ron P. Smith, 2016. "The evolution of concentration in the arms market," Economics of Peace and Security Journal, EPS Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 12-17, April.
    11. José M. Ortiz-Villajos & José J. Martos-Gómez, 2024. "Military Technology, Defense Spending and Modernization of the Armed Forces: The Case of Spain, 1891-1935," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(7), pages 883-907, October.
    12. Ghodsi, Mahdi & Karamelikli, Huseyin, 2022. "The Impact of Sanctions Imposed by the European Union against Iran on their Bilateral Trade: General versus Targeted Sanctions," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 33-58, February.
    13. Keith Hartley & Peter MacDonald, 2010. "Country Survey Xxi: The United Kingdom," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 43-63.
    14. Darrell J. Glaser & Ahmed S. Rahman, 2017. "Development and Retention of Human Capital in Large Bureaucracies," Departmental Working Papers 60, United States Naval Academy Department of Economics.
    15. George Tridimas, 2010. "Constitutional judicial review and political insurance," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 81-101, February.
    16. Sanjeev Goyal & Adrien Vigier, 2014. "Attack, Defence, and Contagion in Networks," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 81(4), pages 1518-1542.
    17. repec:zbw:rwirep:0270 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. M. Christian Lehmann, 2022. "Fairness preferences as a cause of inefficient war," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 6(1), pages 33-36, December.
    19. John R. Boyce & David M. Bruner, 2009. "Good Fences Make Good Neighbors: Endogenous Property Rights in a Game of Conflict," Working Papers 09-05, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    20. Bayer, Péter & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Peeters, Ronald, 2021. "Farsighted manipulation and exploitation in networks," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    21. Martin Philipp Heger & Eric Neumayer, 2022. "Economic legacy effects of armed conflict: Insights from the civil war in Aceh, Indonesia," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(4), pages 394-421, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04319831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.