IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-03475634.html

The redesign of electricity markets under EU influence: The capacity mechanism in France and Britain

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Reverdy

    (PACTE - Pacte, Laboratoire de sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - IEPG - Sciences Po Grenoble-UGA - Institut d'études politiques de Grenoble - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Frédéric Marty

    (CIRANO - Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations [Montréal, Canada] = Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations [Montréal, Canada], OFCE - Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po, GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)

  • Ronan Bolton

Abstract

The liberalisation of the electricity sector in Europe has led to a decentralisation of investment decisions to economic actors. A key assumption behind this was that investors make their decisions based on price signals. Ensuring that there is adequate generation capacity in place to meet demand therefore became a function of the market, rather than a central planning authority. Nevertheless, in many countries, the risk of supply failure has led to the implementation of an addition to power markets known as the capacity mechanism. This chapter explains how this market reform was implemented in the UK and France, the political motivations behind it, the mobilisation of economic expertise and the process of validation by the European authorities. It highlights the increasing role of State Aid control in the framing of national regulations, defining the standard for electricity market organisation and conditions for legitimate deviation from the standard.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Reverdy & Frédéric Marty & Ronan Bolton, 2021. "The redesign of electricity markets under EU influence: The capacity mechanism in France and Britain," Post-Print halshs-03475634, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03475634
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03475634v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03475634v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Severin Borenstein & James Bushnell, 2015. "The US Electricity Industry After 20 Years of Restructuring," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 7(1), pages 437-463, August.
    2. Roques, Fabien A., 2008. "Market design for generation adequacy: Healing causes rather than symptoms," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 171-183, September.
    3. Merethe Dotterud Leiren & Kacper Szulecki & Tim Rayner & Catherine Banet, 2019. "Energy Security Concerns versus Market Harmony: The Europeanisation of Capacity Mechanisms," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 92-104.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. Lüken genannt Klaßen, Hermann, 2026. "Emergency measures before the crisis? The puzzling pattern of price controls in the EU electricity market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PA).
    3. Zajdler, Robert, 2020. "The role of capacity in the EU internal electricity market in the context of the general court's judgment of 15 November 2018. In case T-793/14 Tempus energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Bialek, Sylwia & Gregory, Jack & Revesz, Richard L., 2022. "Still your grandfather's boiler: Estimating the effects of the Clean Air Act's grandfathering provisions," Working Papers 05/2022, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung.
    5. Juha Teirilä & Robert A. Ritz, 2019. "Strategic Behaviour in a Capacity Market? The New Irish Electricity Market Design," The Energy Journal, , vol. 40(1_suppl), pages 105-126, June.
    6. Pablo David Necoechea-Porras & Asunción López & Juan Carlos Salazar-Elena, 2021. "Deregulation in the Energy Sector and Its Economic Effects on the Power Sector: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Wang, Aijia & Mah, Daphne Ngar-yin, 2026. "A systematic review on varieties, effectiveness and determinants of consumer engagement in the context of electricity market reforms from a European-Asian comparative perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PD).
    8. Kapeller, Rudolf & Kulawik, Jakob & Rusch, Katharina & Knöbl, Melanie & Kockel, Christina & Priesmann, Jan & Reichl, Johannes & Praktiknjo, Aaron, 2026. "A review of determining reliability standards for electricity supply via value of lost load and cost of new entry in the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    9. Brown, David P. & Eckert, Andrew & Shaffer, Blake, 2023. "Evaluating the impact of divestitures on competition: Evidence from Alberta’s wholesale electricity market," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Arango, Santiago & Larsen, Erik, 2011. "Cycles in deregulated electricity markets: Empirical evidence from two decades," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2457-2466, May.
    11. Liu, Lirong & Huang, Guohe & Baetz, Brian & Huang, Charley Z. & Zhang, Kaiqiang, 2019. "Integrated GHG emissions and emission relationships analysis through a disaggregated ecologically-extended input-output model; A case study for Saskatchewan, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 97-109.
    12. Simshauser, P., 2026. "Coordinating Coal Plant Closures: Transient Strategic Reserves in Transitioning Energy-Only Markets," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2627, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    13. Bernstein, David H. & Parmeter, Christopher F., 2019. "Returns to scale in electricity generation: Replicated and revisited," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 4-15.
    14. John García Rendón & Dalia Patino Echeverri & Manuel Correa Giraldo, 2019. "Integration of non-conventional renewable energy sources and smart grids in the United States: evidence from PJM," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 17785, Universidad EAFIT.
    15. Kacper Szulecki & Dag Herald Claes, 2019. "Towards Decarbonization: Understanding EU Energy Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 1-5.
    16. Brown, D.P. & Tsai, C.H. & Woo, C.K. & Zarnikau, J. & Zhu, S., 2020. "Residential electricity pricing in Texas's competitive retail market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Bravo-Melgarejo, Sai & Haritchabalet, Carole, 2025. "Prosumers: Grid vs. individual storage," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    18. Defeuilley, Christophe, 2019. "Energy transition and the future(s) of the electricity sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 97-105.
    19. Adam Konto Kyari & Labaran Mohammed Lawal, 2021. "An Empirical Enquiry into Stakeholders Perception of Electricity Pricing Methodology," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(2), pages 75-82.
    20. Simshauser, Paul, 2020. "Merchant renewables and the valuation of peaking plant in energy-only markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03475634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.