IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01735734.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Réduire ou repenser la mobilité urbaine quotidienne ?

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Raux

    (LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION - Comment orienter les comportements de mobilité quotidienne de manière à rendre celle-ci moins consommatrice de ressources environnementales ? Par consommation de ressources environnementales nous entendons les nuisances au cadre de vie et à l'environnement local et global, ainsi que les consommations d'espace et d'énergie par l'activité de transport. Il apparaît possible de jouer sur plusieurs tableaux : - « réorienter la demande de transport du véhicule routier individuel vers les modes plus économes en ressources consommées au voyageur-kilomètre ; - réduire les émissions produites par la filière du transport routier au moyen d'innovations technologiques et organisationnelles internes à cette filière ; - réduire ou au moins modérer la croissance des kilomètres parcourus par les véhicules motorisés. Nous focaliserons la discussion sur la mobilité quotidienne se déployant dans les zones urbaines et leurs aires dépendantes, là où vit la majeure partie de la population. Pourtant les déplacements urbains, au sens strict, et régionaux, qui prennent en compte l'émergence des régions urbaines, ne représentent qu'une partie des voyageurs-kilomètres (environ la moitié du total généré, tous modes terrestres et aériens confondus, en France, en 1990). L'importance de cette mobilité quotidienne en région urbaine et les marges de manœuvre qu'offrent les possibilités d'alternatives à l'automobile comme les transports collectifs et les modes de proximité (marche à pied et vélo) en font une cible d'action privilégiée. Ce rapport ne préjuge donc pas des actions complémentaires, mais probablement différentes, à mener par rapport à la mobilité d'affaires ou de loisirs à longue distance : ces dernières partagent souvent les mêmes infrastructures que la mobilité quotidienne, sans oublier le transport routier de marchandises.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Raux, 1996. "Réduire ou repenser la mobilité urbaine quotidienne ?," Post-Print halshs-01735734, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01735734
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01735734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01735734/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bonnel, Patrick, 1995. "Urban car policy in Europe," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 83-95, April.
    2. Wachs, Martin, 1993. "Learning from Los Angeles: Transport, Urban Form, and Air Quality," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2wv0h7rq, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Charles Raux & Odile Andan & Bruno Faivre d'Arcier & Cécile Godinot, 1995. "Les réactions au péage urbain. Enquête exploratoire," Post-Print halshs-00139369, HAL.
    4. Odile Andan & Bruno Faivre d'Arcier & Charles Raux & Françoise Brassart & Jean-Michel Cusset & Jean-Louis Routhier, 1989. "Mobilité résidentielle, activités et espaces fréquentés en milieux périurbains: enquête en périphérie de Lyon," Working Papers halshs-01203288, HAL.
    5. Small, Kenneth A., 2001. "Using the Revenues from Congestion Pricing," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7170x9b0, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Phang, Sock-Yong, 1993. "Singapore's motor vehicle policy: Review of recent changes and a suggested alternative," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 329-336, July.
    7. Small, Kenneth A., 1992. "Using the Revenues from Congestion Pricing," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt32p9m3mm, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Charles Raux, 2007. "Le péage urbain," Post-Print halshs-00178037, HAL.
    9. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00817483 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timilsina, Govinda R. & Dulal, Hari B., 2008. "Fiscal policy instruments for reducing congestion and atmospheric emissions in the transport sector : a review," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4652, The World Bank.
    2. Eliasson, Jonas, 2016. "Is congestion pricing fair? Consumer and citizen perspectives on equity effects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Barter, Paul A., 2005. "A vehicle quota integrated with road usage pricing: A mechanism to complete the phase-out of high fixed vehicle taxes in Singapore," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 525-536, November.
    4. He, Brian Yueshuai & Zhou, Jinkai & Ma, Ziyi & Wang, Ding & Sha, Di & Lee, Mina & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ozbay, Kaan, 2021. "A validated multi-agent simulation test bed to evaluate congestion pricing policies on population segments by time-of-day in New York City," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 145-161.
    5. John W Helsel & Venktesh Pandey & Stephen D. Boyles, 2020. "Time-Equitable Dynamic Tolling Scheme For Single Bottlenecks," Papers 2007.07091, arXiv.org.
    6. Eliasson, Jonas & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2006. "Equity effects of congestion pricing: Quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 602-620, August.
    7. De Vos, Jonas, 2016. "Road pricing in a polycentric urban region: Analysing a pilot project in Belgium," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 134-142.
    8. Yang Liu & Yu (Marco) Nie, 2017. "A Credit-Based Congestion Management Scheme in General Two-Mode Networks with Multiclass Users," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 681-711, September.
    9. Arnott, Richard, 2013. "A bathtub model of downtown traffic congestion," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 110-121.
    10. Levine, Jonathan & Garb, Yaakov, 2002. "Congestion pricing's conditional promise: promotion of accessibility or mobility?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 179-188, July.
    11. Yang, Hai & Huang, Hai-Jun, 1998. "Principle of marginal-cost pricing: how does it work in a general road network?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 45-54, January.
    12. Virginia Petraki & Panagiotis Papantoniou & Asimina Korentzelou & George Yannis, 2022. "Public Acceptability of Environmentally Linked Congestion and Parking Charging Policies in Greek Urban Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Yacan Wang & Yu Wang & Luyao Xie & Huiyu Zhou, 2018. "Impact of Perceived Uncertainty on Public Acceptability of Congestion Charging: An Empirical Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Harrington, Winston & Krupnick, Alan J. & Alberini, Anna, 2001. "Overcoming public aversion to congestion pricing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 87-105, February.
    15. Teubel, Ulf, 1997. "Wirkung von Straßenbenutzungsabgaben auf die Wohlfahrt von Berufspendlern: Eine empirische Analyse," Discussion Papers 2/97, Technische Universität Dresden, "Friedrich List" Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, Institute of Transport and Economics.
    16. Lei Zhang & David Levinson & Shanjiang Zhu, 2007. "Agent-Based Model of Price Competition and Product Differentiation on Congested Networks," Working Papers 200809, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    17. Mohamad Shatanawi & Fatma Abdelkhalek & Ferenc Mészáros, 2020. "Urban Congestion Charging Acceptability: An International Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Small, Kenneth A. & Gomez-Ilbanez, Jose A., 1998. "Road Pricing for Congestion Management: The Transition from Theory to Policy," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8kk909p1, University of California Transportation Center.
    19. C. Robin Lindsey & Erik T. Verhoef, 1999. "Congestion Modelling," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 99-091/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. De Borger, Bruno & Proost, Stef, 2012. "A political economy model of road pricing," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 79-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01735734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.