IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01735734.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Réduire ou repenser la mobilité urbaine quotidienne ?

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Raux

    (LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION - Comment orienter les comportements de mobilité quotidienne de manière à rendre celle-ci moins consommatrice de ressources environnementales ? Par consommation de ressources environnementales nous entendons les nuisances au cadre de vie et à l'environnement local et global, ainsi que les consommations d'espace et d'énergie par l'activité de transport. Il apparaît possible de jouer sur plusieurs tableaux : - « réorienter la demande de transport du véhicule routier individuel vers les modes plus économes en ressources consommées au voyageur-kilomètre ; - réduire les émissions produites par la filière du transport routier au moyen d'innovations technologiques et organisationnelles internes à cette filière ; - réduire ou au moins modérer la croissance des kilomètres parcourus par les véhicules motorisés. Nous focaliserons la discussion sur la mobilité quotidienne se déployant dans les zones urbaines et leurs aires dépendantes, là où vit la majeure partie de la population. Pourtant les déplacements urbains, au sens strict, et régionaux, qui prennent en compte l'émergence des régions urbaines, ne représentent qu'une partie des voyageurs-kilomètres (environ la moitié du total généré, tous modes terrestres et aériens confondus, en France, en 1990). L'importance de cette mobilité quotidienne en région urbaine et les marges de manœuvre qu'offrent les possibilités d'alternatives à l'automobile comme les transports collectifs et les modes de proximité (marche à pied et vélo) en font une cible d'action privilégiée. Ce rapport ne préjuge donc pas des actions complémentaires, mais probablement différentes, à mener par rapport à la mobilité d'affaires ou de loisirs à longue distance : ces dernières partagent souvent les mêmes infrastructures que la mobilité quotidienne, sans oublier le transport routier de marchandises.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Raux, 1996. "Réduire ou repenser la mobilité urbaine quotidienne ?," Post-Print halshs-01735734, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01735734
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01735734v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01735734v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt2wv0h7rq is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt32p9m3mm is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Bonnel, Patrick, 1995. "Urban car policy in Europe," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 83-95, April.
    4. Charles Raux & Odile Andan & Bruno Faivre d'Arcier & Cécile Godinot, 1995. "Les réactions au péage urbain. Enquête exploratoire," Post-Print halshs-00139369, HAL.
    5. Odile Andan & Bruno Faivre d'Arcier & Charles Raux & Françoise Brassart & Jean-Michel Cusset & Jean-Louis Routhier, 1989. "Mobilité résidentielle, activités et espaces fréquentés en milieux périurbains: enquête en périphérie de Lyon," Working Papers halshs-01203288, HAL.
    6. Phang, Sock-Yong, 1993. "Singapore's motor vehicle policy: Review of recent changes and a suggested alternative," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 329-336, July.
    7. Charles Raux, 2007. "Le péage urbain," Post-Print halshs-00178037, HAL.
    8. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00817483 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singfat Chu, 2018. "Singapore’s Vehicle Quota System and its impact on motorcycles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1419-1432, September.
    2. Piotr Olszewski, 2007. "Singapore motorisation restraint and its implications on travel behaviour and urban sustainability," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 319-335, May.
    3. Timilsina, Govinda R. & Dulal, Hari B., 2009. "Regulatory instruments to control environmental externalities from the transport sector," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 41, pages 80-112.
    4. Singfat Chu, 2011. "Sealed v/s open bids for certificates of entitlement under the vehicle quota system in Singapore," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 215-226, March.
    5. Almasri, Radwan & Muneer, Tariq & Cullinane, Kevin, 2011. "The effect of transport on air quality in urban areas of Syria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3605-3611, June.
    6. Chin, Anthony & Smith, Peter, 1997. "Automobile ownership and government policy: The economics of Singapore's vehicle quota scheme," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 129-140, March.
    7. Diao, Mi, 2019. "Towards sustainable urban transport in Singapore: Policy instruments and mobility trends," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 320-330.
    8. Timilsina, Govinda R. & Dulal, Hari B., 2009. "A review of regulatory instruments to control environmental externalities from the transport sector," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4867, The World Bank.
    9. Wang, Shenhao & Zhao, Jinhua, 2017. "The distributional effects of lotteries and auctions—License plate regulations in Guangzhou," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 473-483.
    10. Derycke, Pierre-Henri, 2009. "Regards sur l’économie urbaine 40 ans de recherches francophones (1965-2007)," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Editions NecPlus, vol. 2009(02), pages 239-266, June.
    11. Cameron, I. & Lyons, T. J. & Kenworthy, J. R., 2004. "Trends in vehicle kilometres of travel in world cities, 1960-1990: underlying drivers and policy responses," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 287-298, July.
    12. Chu, Singfat, 2002. "Auctioning rights to vehicle ownership: Singapore's experience with sealed-bid tenders," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 555-561, July.
    13. Timilsina, Govinda R. & Dulal, Hari B., 2008. "Fiscal policy instruments for reducing congestion and atmospheric emissions in the transport sector : a review," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4652, The World Bank.
    14. Chu, Sing-Fat & Koh, Winston T. H. & Tse, Yiu Kuen, 2004. "Expectations formation and forecasting of vehicle demand: an empirical study of the vehicle quota auctions in Singapore," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 367-381, June.
    15. Chu, Singfat, 2012. "Allocation flexibility and price efficiency within Singapore’s Vehicle Quota System," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1541-1550.
    16. Suwei Feng & Qiang Li, 2018. "Evaluating the car ownership control policy in Shanghai: a structural vector auto-regression approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 205-232, January.
    17. Kenworthy, Jeffrey R. & Laube, Felix B., 1999. "Patterns of automobile dependence in cities: an international overview of key physical and economic dimensions with some implications for urban policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 691-723.
    18. Koh, Winston T. H., 2003. "Control of vehicle ownership and market competition: theory and Singapore's experience with the vehicle quota system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 749-770, November.
    19. Densing, Martin & Turton, Hal & Bäuml, Georg, 2012. "Conditions for the successful deployment of electric vehicles – A global energy system perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 137-149.
    20. Patrick Bonnel & Pascal Pochet, 2002. "Analysis of principal trends of mobility related to location policy, car ownership, supply policy and ageing of population," Post-Print halshs-00088217, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01735734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.