The dynamics of innovation influents: contracts and sustainable energy innovation uptake
Despite a growing interest, sustainable energy innovations encounter difficulties in attaining market success. This paper investigates the role of contracts, a hitherto understudied innovation influent, in generating more conducive conditions for sustainable energy innovations in building projects. With the help of two case studies we identify three dynamics evoked by specific types of building contracts with sustainability focus: the dynamics of thinking beyond the habitual, the dynamics of reverse calculation, and the dynamics of countability. These dynamics change the prevailing level of ambition of the project and the ways in which the benefits and costs are calculated and thereby create a strong entanglement of the sustainable energy innovation and the design project. Furthermore, the dynamics lead to favouring of uptake of existing innovations rather than generating completely novel solutions. The article concludes with a discussion about the possibilities of policy intervention for innovation supportive dynamics in construction projects.
|Date of creation:||28 Aug 2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Note:||View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00743386|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/|
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Manley, Karen, 2008. "Against the odds: Small firms in Australia successfully introducing new technology on construction projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1751-1764, December.
- Mattias Jacobsson & Henrik Linderoth, 2010. "The influence of contextual elements, actors' frames of reference, and technology on the adoption and use of ICT in construction projects: a Swedish case study," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 13-23.
- Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2010. "The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 125-141, January.
- Libby Schweber & Chris Harty, 2010. "Actors and objects: a socio-technical networks approach to technology uptake in the construction sector," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 657-674.
- Chris Ivory, 2005. "The cult of customer responsiveness: is design innovation the price of a client-focused construction industry?," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(8), pages 861-870.
- Shu-Ling Lu & Martin Sexton, 2006. "Innovation in small construction knowledge-intensive professional service firms: a case study of an architectural practice," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(12), pages 1269-1282.
- Toke Reichstein & Ammon Salter & David Gann, 2005. "Last among equals: a comparison of innovation in construction, services and manufacturing in the UK," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 631-644.
- George Seaden & Michael Guolla & Jerome Doutriaux & John Nash, 2003. "Strategic decisions and innovation in construction firms," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 603-612.
- Chris Harty, 2008. "Implementing innovation in construction: contexts, relative boundedness and actor-network theory," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(10), pages 1029-1041.
- Karen Manley, 2006. "The innovation competence of repeat public sector clients in the Australian construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(12), pages 1295-1304.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00743386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.