IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00566236.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Web and face-to-face travel surveys: how comparable are they?
[Enquête déplacements web - face-à-face : quelle comparabilité ?]

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Bayart

    (LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, SAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

  • Patrick Bonnel

    (LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Response rates for household travel surveys are tending to fall, and it seems unlikely that this trend will be reversed in the future. In recent years, travel data collection methods have evolved in order to obtain reliable data that are sufficiently detailed to feed increasingly complex models, and in order to integrate new technologies into survey protocols (Internet, GPS...). Combining different media is an obvious low-cost way of improving data quality as it increases the overall response rate. But the question of the comparability of data over time and between different survey modes remains unresolved. This paper makes a comparative analysis between the travel behaviours of web-based survey respondents and respondents to a face-to-face interview. The data were obtained from the 2006 Lyon conurbation household travel survey. Our analysis shows that the Internet respondents travelled less than the face-to-face respondents (3.0 versus 3.63 daily trips), and that the differences between the two groups varied according to the travel mode and trip purpose. While part of this difference can be explained by socio-economic disparities (the Internet respondents had a specific profile) we cannot exclude the possibility of under-reporting due to the web medium.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2010. "Web and face-to-face travel surveys: how comparable are they? [Enquête déplacements web - face-à-face : quelle comparabilité ?]," Post-Print halshs-00566236, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00566236
    DOI: 10.46298/cst.12097
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00566236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00566236/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46298/cst.12097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donggen Wang & Fion Law, 2007. "Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on time use and travel behavior: a structural equations analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 513-527, July.
    2. Jean-Loup Madre & Kay Axhausen & Werner Brög, 2007. "Immobility in travel diary surveys," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 107-128, January.
    3. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    4. Patrick Bonnel, 2003. "Postal, Telephone and Face-to-face Surveys : How Comparable Are They?," Post-Print halshs-00091025, HAL.
    5. Patrick Bonnel & Michel Le Nir, 1998. "The quality of survey data: Telephone versus face-to-face interviews," Post-Print halshs-00140887, HAL.
    6. Abolfazl (Kouros) Mohammadian & Shlomo Bekhor, 2008. "Travel behavior of special population groups," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 579-583, August.
    7. Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Chen, Cynthia, 2004. "TTB or not TTB, that is the question: a review and analysis of the empirical literature on travel time (and money) budgets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(9-10), pages 643-675.
    8. Peter Stopher & Camden FitzGerald & Min Xu, 2007. "Assessing the accuracy of the Sydney Household Travel Survey with GPS," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 723-741, November.
    9. Dick Ettema & Tim Schwanen & Harry Timmermans, 2007. "The effect of location, mobility and socio-demographic factors on task and time allocation of households," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 89-105, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mirkan Geyik & Patrick Bonnel & Caroline Bayart, 2016. "Impact of the choice of data collection method on mobility surveys [L’impact du mode de recueil des données sur la mobilité déclarée]," Working Papers halshs-01485226, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2012. "Combining web and face-to-face in travel surveys: comparability challenges?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 1147-1171, November.
    2. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2010. "L'impact du mode d'enquête sur la mesure des comportements de mobilité," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 437(1), pages 47-70.
    3. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2015. "How to Combine Survey Media (Web, Telephone, Face-to-Face): Lyon and Rhône-alps Case Study," Post-Print halshs-01663683, HAL.
    4. Patrick Bonnel & Caroline Bayart & Brett Smith, 2015. "Workshop Synthesis: Comparing and Combining Survey Modes," Post-Print halshs-01663724, HAL.
    5. Weis, Claude & Axhausen, Kay W., 2009. "Induced travel demand: Evidence from a pseudo panel data based structural equations model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 8-18.
    6. Wang, Donggen & Lin, Tao, 2013. "Built environments, social environments, and activity-travel behavior: a case study of Hong Kong," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 286-295.
    7. Bayart, Caroline & Bonnel, Patrick & Havet, Nathalie, 2018. "Daily (im)mobility behaviours in France: An application of hurdle models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 456-467.
    8. Marcela Munizaga & Sergio Jara-Díaz & Javiera Olguín & Jorge Rivera, 2011. "Generating twins to build weekly time use data from multiple single day OD surveys," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 511-524, May.
    9. Steven Farber & Antonio Páez & Ruben Mercado & Matthew Roorda & Catherine Morency, 2011. "A time-use investigation of shopping participation in three Canadian cities: is there evidence of social exclusion?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 17-44, January.
    10. Bert van Wee & Caspar Chorus & Karst T. Geurs, 2012. "ICT and accessibility: research synthesis and future perspectives," Chapters, in: Karst T. Geurs & Kevin J. Krizek & Aura Reggiani (ed.), Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning, chapter 3, pages 37-53, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. P. Christopher Zegras & Menghan Li & Talip Kilic & Nancy Lozano-Gracia & Ajinkya Ghorpade & Marco Tiberti & Ana I. Aguilera & Fang Zhao, 2018. "Assessing the representativeness of a smartphone-based household travel survey in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 335-363, March.
    12. Páez, Antonio & Moniruzzaman, Md. & Bourbonnais, Pierre-Leo & Morency, Catherine, 2013. "Developing a web-based accessibility calculator prototype for the Greater Montreal Area," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 103-115.
    13. Christian Holz-Rau & Joachim Scheiner & Kathrin Sicks, 2014. "Travel Distances in Daily Travel and Long-Distance Travel: What Role is Played by Urban Form?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(2), pages 488-507, February.
    14. Konstadinos G. Goulias & Ram M. Pendyala, 2014. "Choice context," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 5, pages 101-130, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Wang, Donggen & Cao, Xinyu, 2017. "Impacts of the built environment on activity-travel behavior: Are there differences between public and private housing residents in Hong Kong?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 25-35.
    16. Erling Holden & Kristin Linnerud, 2011. "Troublesome Leisure Travel," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(14), pages 3087-3106, November.
    17. Budnitz, Hannah & Tranos, Emmanouil & Chapman, Lee, 2020. "Telecommuting and other trips: an English case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    18. Bris, Myriam & Pawlak, Jacek & Polak, John W., 2017. "How is ICT use linked to household transport expenditure? A cross-national macro analysis of the influence of home broadband access," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 231-242.
    19. Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Madzlan Napiah & Imtiaz Ahmed Chandio & Shabir Hussain Khahro, 2012. "Transportation Planning Survey Methodologies for the Proposed Study of Physical and Socio-economic Development of Deprived Rural Regions: A Review," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(7), pages 1-1, July.
    20. Rajesh Paleti & Lacramioara Balan, 2019. "Misclassification in travel surveys and implications to choice modeling: application to household auto ownership decisions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1467-1485, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00566236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.