IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05581961.html

Mapping voluntary sustainability standard systems in the mining, minerals, and metals sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Chenhui Zhang

    (University of Waterloo [Waterloo])

  • Capucine Nouvel Zurcher

    (BRGM - Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières)

  • Daniel Monfort Climent

    (BRGM - Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières)

  • Steven Young

    (University of Waterloo [Waterloo])

Abstract

Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSS) are playing an increasingly central role in the governance of sustainability in the mining, minerals, and metals (M3) sectors. Yet their development remains fragmented and under-documented. This study makes four key contributions. First, it proposes a sector-specific definition of VSS, highlighting their voluntary and non-governmental nature, sustainability orientation, and use of assurance mechanisms. Second, it compiles a comprehensive and conceptually consistent database of 38 active VSS, covering both artisanal and large-scale mining systems across the value chain, as well as 6 market- and trade-related standards. Third, it constructs a longitudinal timeline (2002–2026) of VSS evolution, identifying four distinct phases – initiation, expansion, acceleration, and consolidation – shaped by reputational crises, institutional responses, and regulatory alignment. Finally, it maps interconnections among standards and their references to international frameworks, including the OECD, UN, ILO, and ISO foundations. These contributions provide a unique empirical foundation and conceptual framework for evaluating the effectiveness, coherence, and institutional positioning of VSS in global mineral governance. The study advances theoretical discussions on polycentric and hybrid governance, offers practical guidance for policymakers, firms, and NGOs navigating increasingly complex certification landscapes, and lays groundwork for future research on the institutionalization and harmonization of sustainability standards

Suggested Citation

  • Chenhui Zhang & Capucine Nouvel Zurcher & Daniel Monfort Climent & Steven Young, 2026. "Mapping voluntary sustainability standard systems in the mining, minerals, and metals sectors," Post-Print hal-05581961, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05581961
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2026.105922
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05581961v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05581961v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2026.105922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Bakker, Frank G.A. & Rasche, Andreas & Ponte, Stefano, 2019. "Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives on Sustainability: A Cross-Disciplinary Review and Research Agenda for Business Ethics," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(3), pages 343-383, July.
    2. Gilbert, Dirk Ulrich & Rasche, Andreas, 2007. "Discourse Ethics and Social Accountability: The Ethics of SA 8000," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 187-216, April.
    3. Julia Black, 2008. "Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 137-164, June.
    4. Nava, Lucrezia & Tampe, Maja, 2023. "The Challenge of Implementing Voluntary Sustainability Standards: A Dynamic Framework on the Tension between Adherence and Adaptation," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 296-326, April.
    5. Gudrun Franken & Philip Schütte, 2022. "Current trends in addressing environmental and social risks in mining and mineral supply chains by regulatory and voluntary approaches," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(3), pages 653-671, December.
    6. Axel Marx & Charline Depoorter & Santiago Fernandez de Cordoba & Rupal Verma & Mercedes Araoz & Graeme Auld & Janne Bemelmans & Elizabeth A. Bennett & Eva Boonaert & Clara Brandi & Thomas Dietz & Eve , 2024. "Global governance through voluntary sustainability standards: Developments, trends and challenges," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(4), pages 708-728, September.
    7. Hilson, Gavin, 2012. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the extractive industries: Experiences from developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 131-137.
    8. Gilbert, Dirk Ulrich & Rasche, Andreas & Waddock, Sandra, 2011. "Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 23-44, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Rasche & Wencke Gwozdz & Mathias Lund Larsen & Jeremy Moon, 2022. "Which firms leave multi‐stakeholder initiatives? An analysis of delistings from the United Nations Global Compact," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 309-326, January.
    2. Richard W. Carney & Sadok El Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami & Jane W. Lu & He Wang, 2022. "Political corporate social responsibility: The role of deliberative capacity," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(8), pages 1766-1784, October.
    3. Tiago Teixeira da Silva Siqueira & Amélie Gonçalves & Melise Dantas Machado Bouroullec & Lisa Mur, 2023. "Governance of sustainability standards in new farmers collective's brands: The case of Occitania dairy sector. Farmers' brands and sustainability standards [La gouvernance des standards de durabilité dans les nouvelles marques collectives portées ," Post-Print hal-04420591, HAL.
    4. Silvia Ayuso & Mercè Roca & Jorge A. Arevalo & Deepa Aravind, 2016. "What Determines Principle-Based Standards Implementation? Reporting on Global Compact Adoption in Spanish Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 553-565, February.
    5. Rasul Ahmed Minja & Stefano Ponte & Asubisye Mwamfupe & Christine Noe & Daniel Brockington, 2023. "The Legitimacy of Sustainability Initiatives in Tanzania," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(3), pages 453-482, June.
    6. Andreas Rasche & Frank Bakker & Jeremy Moon, 2013. "Complete and Partial Organizing for Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(4), pages 651-663, July.
    7. Rob Barlow, 2022. "Deliberation Without Democracy in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives: A Pragmatic Way Forward," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 543-561, December.
    8. Simone de Colle & Adrian Henriques & Saras Sarasvathy, 2014. "The Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 177-191, December.
    9. Yossi Dahan & Hanna Lerner & Faina Milman-Sivan, 2023. "Shared Responsibility and Labor Rights in Global Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 1025-1040, February.
    10. Bertrand Venard & Kezang Tshering, 2021. "Barriers to transparency in Bhutan's public administration: A new typology of opacity," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 203-216, October.
    11. Norma Schönherr, 2022. "Same Same but Different? A Quantitative Exploration of Voluntary Sustainability Standards in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Marjo Elisa Siltaoja, 2014. "Revising the Corporate Social Performance Model – Towards Knowledge Creation for Sustainable Development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(5), pages 289-302, July.
    13. Nadine Arnold, 2022. "Accountability in transnational governance: The partial organization of voluntary sustainability standards in long‐term account‐giving," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 375-391, April.
    14. Sarah Margaretha Jastram & Alkis Henri Otto & Tatjana Minulla, 2023. "Diverse Organizational Adoption of Institutions in the Field of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 1073-1088, April.
    15. Glen Whelan, 2013. "Corporate Constructed and Dissent Enabling Public Spheres: Differentiating Dissensual from Consensual Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(4), pages 755-769, July.
    16. Sartor, Marco & Orzes, Guido & Di Mauro, Carmela & Ebrahimpour, Maling & Nassimbeni, Guido, 2016. "The SA8000 social certification standard: Literature review and theory-based research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 164-181.
    17. Tetteh Asare, Emmanuel & Burton, Bruce & Dunne, Theresa, 2024. "Hegemonic influence and selectivity in financial accountability discharge: Evidence from Ghana’s oil and gas sector," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    18. Prabhir Poruthiyil, 2013. "Weaning Business Ethics from Strategic Economism: The Development Ethics Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(4), pages 735-749, September.
    19. Kelly Gerard, 2023. "Doing aid chains differently: Evaluating the potential of Multi‐Stakeholder Partnerships," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    20. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05581961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.