IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05489669.html

Integrating GenAI interactions in marketing studies: A methodological guide

Author

Listed:
  • Moritz Joerling

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

Abstract

Reflecting the ubiquitous presence of generative AI (GenAI), marketing researchers have begun integrating it as an interaction partner in research studies; however, technical barriers and methodological gaps limit its broader adoption. This paper provides a comprehensive guide for implementing GenAI interactions in marketing studies, particularly within the Qualtrics platform. First, a literature review categorizes diverse GenAI applications—from scaling qualitative methods to creating novel experimental paradigms—distinguishing between GenAI as research method versus research object to help researchers identify untapped opportunities. Second, the paper presents a decision framework for when GenAI offers value over traditional methods and explains the principal architecture (frontend, API, backend) that enables researchers to connect any GenAI model to their studies. Crucially, it demonstrates how AI coding assistants can translate natural language instructions into functional code, eliminating programming barriers for non-technical researchers. Third, step-by-step tutorials establish emerging best practices through four implementations spanning text and image modalities: search assistants, automated interviewers, co-creation tools, and hyper-personalized messaging. These implementations serve as adaptable templates empowering researchers to create custom solutions for their unique questions. By mastering AI coding assistants rather than copying specific code, researchers gain methodological independence in a rapidly evolving landscape. This work democratizes GenAI integration and enables previously impossible experimental paradigms.

Suggested Citation

  • Moritz Joerling, 2026. "Integrating GenAI interactions in marketing studies: A methodological guide," Post-Print hal-05489669, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05489669
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.12.003
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05489669v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05489669v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.12.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anuj Kapoor & Madhav Kumar, 2025. "Frontiers: Generative AI and Personalized Video Advertisements," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 733-747, July.
    2. Shiri Melumad & Andrew T Stephen & David Dubois, 2023. "Vocalizing Search: How Voice Technologies Alter Consumer Search Processes and Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 50(3), pages 533-553.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar, Anand & Bala, Pradip Kumar & Chakraborty, Shibashish & Behera, Rajat Kumar, 2024. "Exploring antecedents impacting user satisfaction with voice assistant app: A text mining-based analysis on Alexa services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Lu Fang & Zhe Yuan & Kaifu Zhang & Dante Donati & Miklos Sarvary, 2025. "Generative AI and Firm Productivity: Field Experiments in Online Retail," Papers 2510.12049, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    3. Lu Fang & Zhe Yuan & Kaifu Zhang & Dante Donati & Miklos Sarvary, 2025. "Generative AI and Firm Productivity: Field Experiments in Online Retail," CESifo Working Paper Series 12201, CESifo.
    4. Mukherjee, Pubali & Jain, Varsha, 2026. "How lack of choice to opt-out of generative artificial intelligence in traditional search engines drives consumer switching intentions: The mechanism of empowerment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05489669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.