IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05422853.html

Do the companies of the future have a future? A case-based overview of the structure, development and limitations of delivery platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Sterenn Lebayle

    (UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes, ILCEA4 - Institut des Langues et Cultures d'Europe, Amérique, Afrique, Asie et Australie - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

Abstract

On-demand service platforms like Uber, Deliveroo and Foodora have operated for over a decade. Yet, they have still not achieved profitability. Do these challenges stem from the particular aspects of their business models, such as two-sided markets and digital platforms, or do they reveal deeper structural issues? This article analyses Deliveroo's financial statements and synthesises data from its key stakeholders – restaurants, delivery couriers and consumers. It aims to examine the company's economic framework, track its trajectory since 2018, and highlight the constraints on its growth. The findings show that Deliveroo's cost structure is dominated by variable costs, while revenue from restaurants and consumers remains relatively stable. Since 2022, the two main drivers of profitability – platform growth and reductions in courier compensation – have stagnated, while rising inflation has created substantial obstacles to the financial sustainability of these platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Sterenn Lebayle, 2025. "Do the companies of the future have a future? A case-based overview of the structure, development and limitations of delivery platforms," Post-Print hal-05422853, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05422853
    DOI: 10.13169/workorgalaboglob.19.3.0008
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05422853v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05422853v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.19.3.0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Armstrong, 2006. "Competition in two‐sided markets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(3), pages 668-691, September.
    2. Brodeur, Abel & Nield, Kerry, 2018. "An empirical analysis of taxi, Lyft and Uber rides: Evidence from weather shocks in NYC," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-16.
    3. Paul Belleflamme & Nicolas Neysen, 2017. "The rise and fall of take eat easy, or why markets are not easy to take in the sharing economy," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2936, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amelio, Andrea & Giardino-Karlinger, Liliane & Valletti, Tommaso, 2020. "Exclusionary pricing in two-sided markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Jean-Michel Sahut & Luca Iandoli & Frédéric Teulon, 2021. "The age of digital entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1169, February.
    3. Prabirendra Chatterjee & Bo Zhou, 2021. "Sponsored Content Advertising in a Two-Sided Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7560-7574, December.
    4. Man Wang & Honghui Deng & Keong G. Leong, 2023. "Innovation investment and subsidy strategy in two-sided market," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 337-351, December.
    5. Moraga-Gonzalez, Jose L. & Wildenbeest, Matthijs R., 2011. "Comparison sites," IESE Research Papers D/933, IESE Business School.
      • Jose Luis Moraga-Gonzalez & Matthijs R. Wildenbeest, 2011. "Comparison Sites," Working Papers 2011-04, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    6. Bach Quang Ho & Yuki Inoue, 2020. "Driving Network Externalities in Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Christopher Müller & Enrico Böhme, 2014. "The Monopoly Benchmark on Two-Sided Markets," Finnish Economic Papers, Finnish Economic Association, vol. 27(1), pages 56-69, Autumn.
    8. Esther Gal-Or & Ronen Gal-Or & Nabita Penmetsa, 2018. "The Role of User Privacy Concerns in Shaping Competition Among Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 698-722, September.
    9. Naixin Zhu, 2023. "Dissertation on Applied Microeconomics of Freemium Pricing Strategies in Mobile App Market," Papers 2305.09479, arXiv.org.
    10. Alexander Matros, 2006. "Optimal Mechanisms for an Auction Mediator," Working Paper 202, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, revised Jan 2006.
    11. Canta, Chiara & Madio, Leonardo & Mantovani, Andrea & Reggiani, Carlo, 2026. "Regulating Physicians’ Prices in the Presence of Health Platforms," TSE Working Papers 26-1741, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    12. Marc Ivaldi & Catherine Muller-Vibes, 2018. "The differentiated effect of advertising on readership: evidence from a two-sided market approach," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 363-376, September.
    13. Tiffany Ding & Dominique Perrault-Joncas & Orit Ronen & Michael I. Jordan & Dirk Bergemann & Dean Foster & Omer Gottesman, 2025. "Marketplace Operators Can Induce Competitive Pricing," Papers 2503.06582, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    14. Aslan, Fatma & Haouel, Chourouk & Nemeslaki, Andras & Somogyi, Robert, 2021. "Direct network externalities and dynamics of two-sided platforms," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238006, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    15. Vincent Malardé & Thierry Pénard, 2022. "The role of local network effects and spatial effects in the growth of digital platforms: Evidence from the carpooling site iDVROOM [Le rôle des effets de réseau locaux et des effets spatiaux dans le développement des plateformes numériques : le c," Post-Print hal-03712336, HAL.
    16. Hui Li & Qiaowei Shen & Yakov Bart, 2018. "Local Market Characteristics and Online-to-Offline Commerce: An Empirical Analysis of Groupon," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 1860-1878, April.
    17. D'avid Csercsik & Borb'ala Tak'acsn'e T'oth & P'eter Kotek & L'aszl'o 'A. K'oczy & Anne Neumann, 2025. "A model-based analysis of the AggregateEU mechanism: Implications of overbidding and non-commitment," Papers 2504.05269, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    18. Chen, Ying-Ju & Zenou, Yves & Zhou, Junjie, 2022. "The impact of network topology and market structure on pricing," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    19. Amit Kumar Bardhan & Saad Ashraf, 2024. "More buyers or more sellers: on marketing resource allocation strategies of competing two-sided platforms," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2579-2608, December.
    20. De Fraja, Gianni & Sákovics, József, 2012. "Exclusive nightclubs and lonely hearts columns: Non-monotone participation in optional intermediation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 618-632.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05422853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.