IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05285111.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Partnerships for sustainable food and bioeconomy systems in Europe: exploring the role of intermediaries

Author

Listed:
  • Maurine Mamès

    (UMR IATE - Ingénierie des Agro-polymères et Technologies Émergentes - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Mechthild Donner

    (UMR MoISA - Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems (Social and nutritional sciences) - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - CIHEAM-IAMM - Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier - CIHEAM - Centre International de Hautes Études Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement)

  • Hugo de Vries

    (UMR IATE - Ingénierie des Agro-polymères et Technologies Émergentes - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier)

Abstract

Partnerships have their own vision of sustainability, from formal broad concepts such as bioeconomy or blue economy to grounded-specific objectives. As highlighted in numerous studies, managing diverse visions towards a common goal can be challenging. This article seeks to explore the factors influencing sustainable value co-creation through a novel lens: the intermediaries operating at the partnership level. These intermediaries are potential key players in the success of partnerships focused on sustainable food and bioeconomy systems in Europe. To identify their roles and positions, three in-depth case studies were conducted on partnerships (Pôle Mer Mediterranée, Foodwest, and BIOEAST) operating at regional, national and cross-countries scales. The findings contribute to the existing literature by clarifying the role of intermediaries in sustainable value co-creation processes and by classifying the positioning of intermediaries within partnerships. Here, we have described intermediaries as the actors within a partnership who facilitate interactions between partners and/or partners' connections with the outside. Two different types of intermediaries emerged (i) a part-time facilitating group of intermediaries loosely bound together and (ii) a full-time management team of intermediaries coherently intervening. The study demonstrates that both categories have a major influence in shaping the sustainable co-creation process even though they employ different approaches using a unique mix of tools: animation, communication (internal), promotion of the partnership (outside) and coordination. These are further influenced by factors such as the level of formality or informality in communication between intermediaries and partners as well as their specific geographic and thematic contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurine Mamès & Mechthild Donner & Hugo de Vries, 2025. "Partnerships for sustainable food and bioeconomy systems in Europe: exploring the role of intermediaries," Post-Print hal-05285111, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05285111
    DOI: 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101361
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05285111v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05285111v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101361?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Håkansson, Håkan & Snehota, Ivan, 2006. "No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 256-270, September.
    2. De Silva, Muthu & Howells, Jeremy & Meyer, Martin, 2018. "Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 70-87.
    3. Howells, Jeremy, 2006. "Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 715-728, June.
    4. Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M., 2002. "Assessing and improving partnership relationships and outcomes: a proposed framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 215-231, August.
    5. Boglárka Vajda & Gabriela Drăgan & Lajos Vajda & Mária-Magdolna Gáspár & Miklós Levente Bagoly, 2025. "The Role of Entrepreneurial Clusters in Advancing Circular Bioeconomy and Innovation: A Case Study from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Don Clifton & Azlan Amran, 2011. "The Stakeholder Approach: A Sustainability Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 121-136, January.
    7. Milou Derks & Frank Berkers & Arnold Tukker, 2022. "Toward Accelerating Sustainability Transitions through Collaborative Sustainable Business Modeling: A Conceptual Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Juhász, Anikó & Vásáry, Viktória, 2017. "BioEast: Central-Eastern European initiative for knowledge-based agriculture, aquaculture and forestry in the bioeconomy," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 14, pages 1-18.
    9. Janina Grabs & Sophia Carodenuto & Kristjan Jespersen & Marshall A. Adams & Manuel Antonio Camacho & Giacomo Celi & Adelina Chandra & Jeremy Dufour & Erasmus K. H. J. zu Ermgassen & Rachael D. Garrett, 2024. "The role of midstream actors in advancing the sustainability of agri-food supply chains," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(5), pages 527-535, May.
    10. Harro van Lente & Marko Hekkert & Ruud Smits & Bas van Waveren, 2003. "Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(03), pages 247-279.
    11. Derk Loorbach & Janneke C. van Bakel & Gail Whiteman & Jan Rotmans, 2010. "Business strategies for transitions towards sustainable systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 133-146, February.
    12. John Selsky & Barbara Parker, 2010. "Platforms for Cross-Sector Social Partnerships: Prospective Sensemaking Devices for Social Benefit," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 21-37, July.
    13. Ayşem Mert, 2014. "Hybrid governance mechanisms as political instruments: the case of sustainability partnerships," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 225-244, September.
    14. Stephan Manning & Daniel Roessler, 2014. "The Formation of Cross-Sector Development Partnerships: How Bridging Agents Shape Project Agendas and Longer-Term Alliances," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 527-547, September.
    15. L. Hens & B. Nath, 2003. "The Johannesburg Conference," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 7-39, March.
    16. Hugo de Vries & Mechthild Donner & Monique Axelos, 2022. "Sustainable food systems science based on physics’ principles," Post-Print hal-03629092, HAL.
    17. Tao, Yuan, 2022. "Understanding the interactions between multiple actors in network governance: Evidence from school turnaround in China," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coda Zabetta, Massimiliano & Fusillo, Fabrizio & Quatraro, Francesco & Scandura, Alessandra, 2025. "Knowledge brokers for Circular Bioeconomy: Evidence from European regions," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 202505, University of Turin.
    2. Kerstens, Andrea & Langley, David J., 2025. "An innovation intermediary’s role in enhancing absorptive capacity for cross-industry digital innovation: Introducing an awareness capability and new intermediary practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Prodi, Elena & Tassinari, Mattia & Ferrannini, Andrea & Rubini, Lauretta, 2022. "Industry 4.0 policy from a sociotechnical perspective: The case of German competence centres," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Rizzoli, Valentina & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. De Silva, Muthu & Howells, Jeremy & Khan, Zaheer & Meyer, Martin, 2022. "Innovation ambidexterity and public innovation Intermediaries: The mediating role of capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 14-29.
    6. Cuihong Zhang & Ning Liu, 2024. "Innovation intermediaries: a review, bibliometric analysis, and research agenda," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1113-1143, June.
    7. Berkowitz, Heloise & Souchaud, Antoine, 2024. "Filling successive technologically-induced governance gaps: Meta-organizations as regulatory innovation intermediaries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Choi, Hyeseung & Lee, Min-Jae & Roh, Taewoo, 2024. "Is institutional pressure the driver for green business model innovation of SMEs? Mediating and moderating roles of regional innovation intermediaries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    9. Rossi, Federica & Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Russo, Margherita, 2022. "New business models for public innovation intermediaries supporting emerging innovation systems: The case of the Internet of Things," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    10. Bhattacharjya, Bibhuti Ranjan & Bhaduri, Saradindu & Kakoty, Sashindra Kumar, 2023. "Co-creating community-led frugal innovation: An adapted Quadruple Helix?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. Kreiling, Laura & Serval, Sarah & Peres, Raphaële & Bounfour, Ahmed, 2020. "University technology transfer organizations: Roles adopted in response to their regional innovation system stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 218-229.
    12. Kivimaa, Paula & Boon, Wouter & Hyysalo, Sampsa & Klerkx, Laurens, 2019. "Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 1062-1075.
    13. Marc Robert & Philippe Giuliani & Sandra Dubouloz, 2024. "Obstacles affecting the management innovation process through different actors during the covid-19 crisis: a longitudinal study of Industry 4.0," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(3), pages 1601-1626, April.
    14. Abrar Chaudhury, 2020. "Role of Intermediaries in Shaping Climate Finance in Developing Countries—Lessons from the Green Climate Fund," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Leckel, Anja & Veilleux, Sophie & Dana, Leo Paul, 2020. "Local Open Innovation: A means for public policy to increase collaboration for innovation in SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    16. Kathleen Diener & Dirk Luettgens & Frank Thomas Piller, 2019. "Intermediation For Open Innovation: Comparing Direct Versus Delegated Search Strategies Of Innovation Intermediaries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(04), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Clarke, Ian & Klerkx, Laurens & Ramirez, Matias, 2016. "Learning and innovation in developing economy clusters: Comparing private and non-profit intermediaries in cluster governance," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 16712, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    18. Lisa Blix Germundsson & Sören Augustinsson & Alina Lidén, 2020. "Collaboration in the Making—Towards a Practice-Based Approach to University Innovation Intermediary Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Antje Klitkou & Suyash Jolly & Nina Suvinen, 2023. "Systemic intermediaries and the transition toward forest-based bioeconomy in the North," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 321-348, July.
    20. repec:ers:journl:v:vi:y:2018:i:1:p:39-53 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Delorme, Donatienne, 2023. "The role of proximity in the design of innovation intermediaries' business models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05285111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.